Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Explosions in the Sky: Supernovae Imminent?
SpaceRef ^ | 09/30/2004 | NASA

Posted on 10/01/2004 12:59:05 PM PDT by cogitator

After a Trio of Explosions Scientists say Supernova is Imminent

Three powerful recent blasts from three wholly different regions in space have left scientists scrambling. The blasts, which lasted only a few seconds, might be early alert systems for star explosions called supernovae, which could start appearing any day.

The first two blasts, called X-ray flashes, occurred on September 12 and 16. These were followed by a more powerful burst on September 24. The burst seems to be on the cusp between an X-ray flash and a full-fledged gamma ray burst, a discovery interesting in its own right. If these signals lead to supernovae, as expected, scientists would have a tool to predict star explosions, and researchers could watch explosions from start to finish.

A team led by Dr. George Ricker of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, detected the explosions with NASA's High-Energy Transient Explorer (HETE- 2). Science teams around the world, using space- and ground- based observatories, have joined in, torn and conflicted over which burst region to track most closely.

"Each burst has been beautiful," Ricker said. "Depending on how these evolve, they could support important theories about supernovae and gamma-ray bursts. These past two weeks have been like 'cock, fire, reload.' Nature keeps on delivering, and our HETE-2 satellite keeps on responding flawlessly," he said."

Gamma ray bursts are the most powerful explosions known other than the Big Bang. Many appear to be caused by the death of a massive star collapsing into a black hole. Others might be from merging black holes or neutron stars. In either case, the event likely produces twin, narrow jets in opposite directions, which carry off tremendous amounts of energy. If one of jets points to Earth, we see this energy as a gamma ray burst.

The lower-energy X-ray flashes might be gamma ray bursts viewed slightly off angle from the jet direction, somewhat similar to how a flashlight is less blinding when viewed at an angle. The majority of light particles from X-ray flashes, called photons, are X-rays, energetic, but not quite as powerful as gamma rays. Both types of bursts last only a few milliseconds to about a minute. HETE-2 detects the bursts, studies their properties, and provides a location, so other observatories can study the burst afterglow in detail.

The trio of bursts from the past few weeks has the potential of settling two long-standing debates. Some scientists say X- ray flashes are different beasts all together, not related to gamma-ray bursts and massive star explosions. Detecting a supernova in the region where the X-ray flash appeared would refute that belief, instead confirming the connection between the two. Follow-up observations of the September 24 burst, named GRB040924 for the date it was observed, are already solidifying the theory of a cosmic explosion continuum from X-ray flashes up through gamma ray bursts.

More interesting for supernova hunters is the fact X-ray flashes are closer to Earth than gamma ray bursts. While the connection between gamma ray bursts and supernovae has been made, these supernovae are too distant to study in detail. X- ray flashes might be signals for supernovae; scientists can actually sink their teeth into and observe in detail.

"Last year HETE-2 sealed the connection between gamma ray bursts and massive supernovae," said Prof. Stanford Woosley of the University of California at Santa Cruz, who has championed several theories concerning the physics of star explosions. "These two September bursts may be the first time we see an X-ray flash lead to a supernova."

"We all expect much more of this type of exciting science to come after the launch of Swift," said Dr. Anne Kinney, director of NASA's Universe Division. The Swift spacecraft, scheduled to launch no earlier than late October, contains three telescopes (gamma ray, X-ray and UV/optical) for quick burst detection and immediate follow-up observations of the afterglow.

HETE was built by MIT as a mission of opportunity under the NASA Explorer Program. It was built in collaboration among U.S. universities, Los Alamos National Laboratory, N.M., scientists and organizations in Brazil, France, India, Italy and Japan.

For information about HETE results and related animations on the Internet, visit: http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/2004/0930grb.html


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: archaeology; catastrophism; champaignsupernova; explosions; gammaray; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; space; stars; supernova; wereallgonnadie; xray
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-147 next last
To: MarkL
That means that the Missouri Dept of Transportation will have to finish I-70 in the dark...

Sooner than that... first it swells to red supergiant size and incinerates everything out to the orbit of Mars.

81 posted on 10/01/2004 2:16:13 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

God's up to no good.


82 posted on 10/01/2004 2:18:02 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
They cannot. In fact, X-rays are EM just at a higher frequency than visible EM (light).

So why are they waiting for a light show to start (if it does). I was going to ask the same question. If X and Gamma rays have already hit the instruments, wouldn't the explosion already be showing in the visible wavelengths?

83 posted on 10/01/2004 2:18:52 PM PDT by hattend (I'm on the Mark Steyn Ping List! I'm somebody!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Clearly extra-galactic.

You never know. Those sneaky aliens probably have some kind of exotic after-burner on their ships to redshift their exhaust. That way, no one will suspect how close they are.

84 posted on 10/01/2004 2:19:52 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (I'm PatrickHenry and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
That means that the Missouri Dept of Transportation will have to finish I-70 in the dark...

Sooner than that... first it swells to red supergiant size and incinerates everything out to the orbit of Mars.

Oh sure... Now the unions will want to take off early for that one!

Mark

85 posted on 10/01/2004 2:20:15 PM PDT by MarkL (Dude!!! You're farting fire!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

It's my understanding that the full moon is essentially 7% of the brightness of the sun in a clear sky as viewed from the earth. The issue here is relative brightness to the average human spectator, not the intrinsic brightness of the stellar body.
But in any case, your Madsci.org suggests that a supernova'ed Betegeuse would be about the same brightness as the moon, not ten times greater. That seems more likely than 10x the brightness of the moon. That's all I was saying...


86 posted on 10/01/2004 2:21:36 PM PDT by the herald (i still like pudding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

PING


87 posted on 10/01/2004 2:24:59 PM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
Will they be visible?

Based on data from other gamma bursts at the NASA website, it would seem that these are not extra-gallactic events. If not, then any succeeding supernovae should be extremely visible...perhaps to the unaided eye.

88 posted on 10/01/2004 2:25:30 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Which Star Trek Capt. would you want for President? Picard or Kirk? In wartime, the choice is easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
It [Betelgeuse] would be visible at night for several years.

Wow. All these years I thought it was already visible at night. At least if it's not cloudy.
89 posted on 10/01/2004 2:29:56 PM PDT by Gorjus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; 2Jedismom; 4ConservativeJustices; ...
Thanks, F.O. A catastrophism post to the GGG list is in the offing...
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

90 posted on 10/01/2004 2:38:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Three different star ships are using nuclear propulsion to decelerate from near light speed. Not only that, they are all headed in our direction.



;^)
91 posted on 10/01/2004 2:43:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin (We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

Arrrg! Meetings. Will be back on later. Sigh!


92 posted on 10/01/2004 2:51:58 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: the herald

The moon is much less than 7% as bright as the sun. I think it's 0.7%.

But, you're right. The MadSci article proves me wrong. It'd be pretty darn bright any way you look at it!


93 posted on 10/01/2004 2:57:53 PM PDT by RockinRight (W stands for whoop-a**!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
After a Trio of Explosions Scientists say Supernova is Imminent....

....And we have only one StarShip in the quadrant!

94 posted on 10/01/2004 3:00:36 PM PDT by JOE6PAK (The Pajamaheddin. The gadflies of the truth, the guerrillas of the ugly fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Ricker told SPACE.com the stars will likely go supernova 10 to 20 days after the initial bursts that were spotted.

I hope he's right. That would be so cool to see - a supernova! It'd be a once in a lifetime event - if I live to be a thousand.

95 posted on 10/01/2004 3:01:19 PM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: JOE6PAK
That one can handle it.
96 posted on 10/01/2004 3:01:35 PM PDT by BenLurkin (We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Three supernovas apparently.
97 posted on 10/01/2004 3:02:37 PM PDT by BenLurkin (We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Having a strange bright splash of light in the sky each night just might freak out any people who are easily susceptible to superstitious musings.


98 posted on 10/01/2004 3:04:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin (We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yeah, that part is curious. It seems so unlikely that three would become visible at the same time. Like hitting the lottery three times in a row, at least.


99 posted on 10/01/2004 3:05:12 PM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Shouldn't that be:

Don't Panic

In big, friendly letters, and all that.

100 posted on 10/01/2004 3:06:40 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson