Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Explosions in the Sky: Supernovae Imminent?
SpaceRef ^ | 09/30/2004 | NASA

Posted on 10/01/2004 12:59:05 PM PDT by cogitator

After a Trio of Explosions Scientists say Supernova is Imminent

Three powerful recent blasts from three wholly different regions in space have left scientists scrambling. The blasts, which lasted only a few seconds, might be early alert systems for star explosions called supernovae, which could start appearing any day.

The first two blasts, called X-ray flashes, occurred on September 12 and 16. These were followed by a more powerful burst on September 24. The burst seems to be on the cusp between an X-ray flash and a full-fledged gamma ray burst, a discovery interesting in its own right. If these signals lead to supernovae, as expected, scientists would have a tool to predict star explosions, and researchers could watch explosions from start to finish.

A team led by Dr. George Ricker of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, detected the explosions with NASA's High-Energy Transient Explorer (HETE- 2). Science teams around the world, using space- and ground- based observatories, have joined in, torn and conflicted over which burst region to track most closely.

"Each burst has been beautiful," Ricker said. "Depending on how these evolve, they could support important theories about supernovae and gamma-ray bursts. These past two weeks have been like 'cock, fire, reload.' Nature keeps on delivering, and our HETE-2 satellite keeps on responding flawlessly," he said."

Gamma ray bursts are the most powerful explosions known other than the Big Bang. Many appear to be caused by the death of a massive star collapsing into a black hole. Others might be from merging black holes or neutron stars. In either case, the event likely produces twin, narrow jets in opposite directions, which carry off tremendous amounts of energy. If one of jets points to Earth, we see this energy as a gamma ray burst.

The lower-energy X-ray flashes might be gamma ray bursts viewed slightly off angle from the jet direction, somewhat similar to how a flashlight is less blinding when viewed at an angle. The majority of light particles from X-ray flashes, called photons, are X-rays, energetic, but not quite as powerful as gamma rays. Both types of bursts last only a few milliseconds to about a minute. HETE-2 detects the bursts, studies their properties, and provides a location, so other observatories can study the burst afterglow in detail.

The trio of bursts from the past few weeks has the potential of settling two long-standing debates. Some scientists say X- ray flashes are different beasts all together, not related to gamma-ray bursts and massive star explosions. Detecting a supernova in the region where the X-ray flash appeared would refute that belief, instead confirming the connection between the two. Follow-up observations of the September 24 burst, named GRB040924 for the date it was observed, are already solidifying the theory of a cosmic explosion continuum from X-ray flashes up through gamma ray bursts.

More interesting for supernova hunters is the fact X-ray flashes are closer to Earth than gamma ray bursts. While the connection between gamma ray bursts and supernovae has been made, these supernovae are too distant to study in detail. X- ray flashes might be signals for supernovae; scientists can actually sink their teeth into and observe in detail.

"Last year HETE-2 sealed the connection between gamma ray bursts and massive supernovae," said Prof. Stanford Woosley of the University of California at Santa Cruz, who has championed several theories concerning the physics of star explosions. "These two September bursts may be the first time we see an X-ray flash lead to a supernova."

"We all expect much more of this type of exciting science to come after the launch of Swift," said Dr. Anne Kinney, director of NASA's Universe Division. The Swift spacecraft, scheduled to launch no earlier than late October, contains three telescopes (gamma ray, X-ray and UV/optical) for quick burst detection and immediate follow-up observations of the afterglow.

HETE was built by MIT as a mission of opportunity under the NASA Explorer Program. It was built in collaboration among U.S. universities, Los Alamos National Laboratory, N.M., scientists and organizations in Brazil, France, India, Italy and Japan.

For information about HETE results and related animations on the Internet, visit: http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/2004/0930grb.html


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: archaeology; catastrophism; champaignsupernova; explosions; gammaray; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; space; stars; supernova; wereallgonnadie; xray
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last
To: cogitator
What the Hell!

The EPA may me junk my 69 Super Nova for excessive X and Gamma ray emissions.... how come these guy get by?

101 posted on 10/01/2004 3:10:04 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Kerry's foreign policy..........."Mommy may I ?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Obiwan ( Admin Moderator), is our ONLY hope!


102 posted on 10/01/2004 3:13:10 PM PDT by JOE6PAK (The Pajamaheddin. The gadflies of the truth, the guerrillas of the ugly fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Jeremiah Jr

G-g-gamma ray PING!


103 posted on 10/01/2004 3:15:41 PM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Ping!


104 posted on 10/01/2004 3:19:31 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave ("Let's roll" in 2004 ----- Vote for President Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

http://www.garabandal.org/warning.shtml

Only believers need apply.

I deliberately didn't put it as a hyperlink so mockers have to work a little harder to get there.

105 posted on 10/01/2004 3:25:10 PM PDT by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Thanks!


106 posted on 10/01/2004 4:16:18 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist (<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>disingenuous filmmaker</A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

How many special people change
How many lives are living strange
Where were you when we were getting high?
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
Where were you while we were getting high?

Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova in the sky
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova
A champagne supernova in the sky

Wake up the dawn and ask her why
A dreamer dreams she never dies
Wipe that tear away now from your eye
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
Where were you when we were getting high?

Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova in the sky
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova
A champagne supernova in the sky

Cos people believe that they're
Gonna get away for the summer
But you and I, we live and die
The world's still spinning round
We don't know why
Why, why, why, why

How many special people change
How many lives are living strange
Where were you when we were getting high?
Slowly walking down the hall
Faster than a cannon ball
Where were you while we were getting high?

Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova in the sky
Some day you will find me
Caught beneath the landslide
In a champagne supernova
A champagne supernova in the sky

Cos people believe that they're
Gonna get away for the summer
But you and I, we live and die
The world's still spinning round
We don't know why
Why, why, why, why

How many special people change
How many lives are living strange
Where were you when we were getting high?
We were getting high
We were getting high
We were getting high
We were getting high


107 posted on 10/01/2004 4:19:07 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
A clear justification for pre-emption.

... Unless there's a Galactic Test which should be applied.

108 posted on 10/01/2004 4:30:09 PM PDT by VadeRetro (A self-reliant conservative citizenry is a better bet than the subjects of an overbearing state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Might a gamma ray burst from a billion LY out be redshifted into the X-ray spectrum? If so, the X-rays could be nothing more than redshifted cosmic rays from a very distant receding supernova or collapsing black hole.


109 posted on 10/01/2004 4:31:20 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

i think we're both wrong. the moon reflects only 7% of the sunlight that hits it, but it sends out approximately 400,000 times less light (14 magnitudes dimmer). I had to get someone smart to explain it to me.


110 posted on 10/01/2004 5:03:39 PM PDT by the herald (i still like pudding; vanilla best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
A series of earthquakes in California; hurricanes in Florida; Mt. St. Helens about to erupt; a near-miss with a killer asteroid the other day; and now the sky is exploding. What's up?

You forgot the giant fireball burning in the middle of our solar system.

111 posted on 10/01/2004 5:16:56 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (There is no Chaos. Only very complicated Order. (Presenting Lady Snuggles of the Lethal Yew in PJ's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad
We better grab our towels and get off this rock!

Don't forget the Babel fish.

112 posted on 10/01/2004 5:22:02 PM PDT by reformed_democrat ("If it's not close, they can't cheat." -- Some very smart FReeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

hmmmm..dint these supernova happen like 1000s of years ago and we are only now detecting it?


113 posted on 10/01/2004 5:23:23 PM PDT by OhGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Where's Marvin the Martian and his Earth-shattering "KA-BOOM" when you need him?

(sigh)


114 posted on 10/01/2004 5:27:15 PM PDT by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the herald
i think we're both wrong. the moon reflects only 7% of the sunlight that hits it, but it sends out approximately 400,000 times less light (14 magnitudes dimmer). I had to get someone smart to explain it to me.

To put it another way, only 7% of the sunlight that hits the moon gets reflected. But of that 7%, only a tiny portion gets reflected such that it intersects with the earth since it is radiated in all directions, so we only capture a very tiny percent of that 7%.

By analogy, it would be the difference in light between staring into a flashlight at night and seeing the light of that same flashlight reflected off a not-particularly-reflective distant object.

115 posted on 10/01/2004 5:32:04 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
To put it another way, only 7% of the sunlight that hits the moon gets reflected. But of that 7%, only a tiny portion gets reflected such that it intersects with the earth since it is radiated in all directions, so we only capture a very tiny percent of that 7%.

And yet, on a clear enough night, one can see the filled-in outline of the circle on the dark side of a crescent moon. The area beyond the terminator is shining by ... reflected Earthshine. This is VERY dim, but often noticeable.

Which is to say you have an object (Earth) shining by reflected sunlight. We know from photographs taken on the moon thirty years ago that it is glowing as a big blue ball in the Lunar sky. Some little bit of that light finds its way back to Earth.

The distances involved and the inverse square law dictate that the losses should be incredible. They are. Nevertheless, the original source, the sun, is bright enough that you can still see SOMETHING brighter than the background on the dark side of a crescent moon if you look closely on a very clear night.

116 posted on 10/01/2004 5:52:56 PM PDT by VadeRetro (A self-reliant conservative citizenry is a better bet than the subjects of an overbearing state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Eta Carinae - This is the one to watch.
100X as massive as the sun
Brightened in the 1800's to be the 2nd brightest star in
the sky for decades, ejecting the plume observed by Hubble
8,000 light years away
It has probably already blown and we are just waiting for the shout.
117 posted on 10/01/2004 6:01:18 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Quick! Did Bush reduce spending on NASA last year?

Bush could have opted to keep Earth safe. Instead, he gave us this lousy tax cut!

118 posted on 10/01/2004 6:47:32 PM PDT by kcar (theUNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kcar

LOL!


119 posted on 10/01/2004 7:07:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin (We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

120 posted on 10/01/2004 7:11:37 PM PDT by BenLurkin (We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson