Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oral sex lessons to cut rates of teenage pregnancy [UK]
The Observer (UK) ^ | May 9, 2004 | Mark Townsend

Posted on 05/08/2004 8:05:39 PM PDT by aculeus

Encouraging schoolchildren to experiment with oral sex could prove the most effective way of curbing teenage pregnancy rates, a government study has found. Pupils under 16 who were taught to consider other forms of 'intimacy' such as oral sex were significantly less likely to engage in full intercourse, it was revealed.

Britain's teenage pregnancy rate is the highest in Europe. In 2002 there were 39,286 teen pregnancies recorded. The government has spent more than £60 million to tackle the problem but so far failed to halt the rise.

A sex education course developed by Exeter University trains teachers to talk to teenagers about 'stopping points' before full sex.

Now an unpublished government-backed report reveals that a trial of the course has been a success. Schoolchildren, particularly girls, who received such training developed a 'more mature' response to sex.

The study by the National Foundation for Educational Research found youngsters were 'less likely to be sexually active' than peers who received traditional forms of sex education, dispelling the fears of family campaigners who believe such methods actually arouse the sexual interest of teenagers.

Now the government will recommend the scheme, called A Pause, to schools throughout England and Wales following the success of the trial in 104 schools where sexual intercourse among 16-year-olds fell by up to 20 per cent, according to Dr John Tripp of the Department of Child Health at the University of Exeter, who helped to design the course.

Teachers who sign up to the course are primed to deal with queries from pupils on all kinds of sexual experience. Those behind the course stress the scheme does not suggest teenagers experiment with oral sex. Instead they say A Pause promotes the message that other forms of physical intimacy are safer than full intercourse.

'It teaches people assertiveness skills and that they should be only as intimate as they feel comfortable with,' said Tripp.

A Department for Education and Skills spokesman said the report's verdict would be made available to all schools. 'All teachers respect peer-reviewed material, and this will help influence their decision,' he said.

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aidingandabeting; aids; clintonlegacy; corruptingminors; culturewar; homosexualagenda; indoctrination; instigation; itsjustsex; justsayno; permissivesocity; pregnancy; promiscuity; publicschools; sex; sexeducation; sexfirsteducation; sexoffenders; sodomites; sodomy; statutoryrape; stds; taxdollarsatwork; teensex; uk; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: Vigilantcitizen
No talking during the oral exam....
81 posted on 05/09/2004 10:37:57 AM PDT by babaloo999 (Zionist troll since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Didn't this used to be called "third base"?

No...First base was kissing, second base was manual contact below the neck and above the waist, third base was manual contact below the belt, and fourth base [home] was intercourse.

82 posted on 05/09/2004 10:42:40 AM PDT by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Didn't this used to be called "third base"?

Hmmm, during my sheltered high school years, oral sex would have been a grand slam home run ;-)

83 posted on 05/09/2004 10:48:15 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: varon
*sigh* Now it's just foreplay.

Face it (sorry) we were born too soon...
84 posted on 05/09/2004 11:02:50 AM PDT by null and void (Go to red alert? Are you sure? It does mean changing the bulb...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
the most effective way of curbing teenage pregnancy rates,

Maybe. But look for humongous increases in the rates of "clap of the yap".

85 posted on 05/09/2004 11:09:42 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity; varon
No...First base was kissing, second base was manual contact below the neck and above the waist, third base was manual contact below the belt, and fourth base [home] was intercourse.

That was before the Clinton "oral sex is not sex" legal defense. Read this.

According to this student, oral sex is only considered "third base" by most teenagers.

86 posted on 05/09/2004 11:11:09 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I am very, very confused.....I was told a bazillion times a few years ago that oral sex wasn't really sex. So is it, or isn't it?

FRegards,

87 posted on 05/09/2004 11:16:07 AM PDT by Osage Orange (I'm a man. I can change. If I want to. Maybe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Or the time honored, "Don't put that in your mouth - you have no idea where it's been!"
88 posted on 05/09/2004 11:26:16 AM PDT by Let's Roll (Kerry is a self-confessed unindicted war criminal or ... a traitor to his country in a time of war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Better yet, it's gender-neutral.
89 posted on 05/09/2004 11:27:30 AM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
That's because they lost the "S" a long time ago.
90 posted on 05/09/2004 11:28:13 AM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
What? Oral sex is a prelude.
91 posted on 05/09/2004 11:30:46 AM PDT by Porterville (Kerry has no gravitas!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Note to self: "Go get a hot British girlfriend."
92 posted on 05/09/2004 11:33:10 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (The Guns of Brixton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chookter
Check her teeth first...
93 posted on 05/09/2004 11:35:17 AM PDT by null and void (Go to red alert? Are you sure? It does mean changing the bulb...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
r-ls? segments of Britain may still marry quite young.

Those "certain segments" would be Islamic immigrants.

This is something that is almost always left out of media reports about the "teen pregnancy crisis" in the U.S. -- there are HUGE differentials between rates of teen pregnancy for whites, blacks, and Hispanics. If you break it down along ethnic lines, you see that the media is usually trying to obscure the facts for the purpose of fear-mongering rather than trying to enlighten the reader. Suffice it to say, if you're an upper-income white suburbanite in Minnesota, your 16-year-old daughter is much less likely to become pregnant than the 16-year-old daughter of a Mexican immigrant day laborer in San Diego. But the media frequently suggests otherwise: "It could happen to anyone!" And then they have an anecdotal tale of the photogenic blonde cheerleader who gets knocked up, accompanied by a bunch of generic statistics about how "tens of thousands of teenagers become pregnant every month."

Something else they always leave out: Most "teen pregnancies" occur among girls 18 or 19 years old. In other words, these are not "kids having kids," many have already graduated high school and they're not legal minors. These are young adults -- people old enough to work, to vote, to sign a loan, to get married without parental consent, to join the Army. Why are pregnancies among 18- and 19-year-olds lumped into these statistics, except to exaggerate the "crisis"?

To the extent that there is a "crisis," it involves girls 15 and younger -- not old enough to drive, not old enough to work full-time, more than 90 percent unmarried, many the victims of sexual abuse, and having at least two or three more years before they graduate high school. So why not focus all this public hysteria on those few thousand 15-and-under girls who get pregnant every year in America? Because about three-quarters of them are non-white, and if you focused pregnancy prevention efforts on those segments of the population where the "teen pregnancy crisis" really exists, you'd be accused of racism. You'd be accused of cultural insensitivity and failing to appreciate diversity.

And the same is true in England, no doubt. If you subtracted the births to Pakistani, Egyptian and Jamaican girls (etc.) from the UK teen pregnancy statistics, you would undoubtedly find that white girls in England have birth rates not much different from white girls in France, Sweden or Minnesota -- which is to say, relatively low rates. And if you eliminated the British welfare state, the rates would no doubt be even lower.

This kind of crisis mongering over teen pregnancy is just what you can expect from the media. They want you to be constantly fearful of fictitious phantoms -- second-hand smoke, global warming, semiautomatic "assault weapons" -- so that you don't have time to worry about the REAL PROBLEMS in your society.

94 posted on 05/09/2004 11:49:50 AM PDT by Madstrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Good point: "Note to self: get hot British girlfriend with no teeth and a flat head to rest my drink on."
95 posted on 05/09/2004 11:57:50 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (The Guns of Brixton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Madstrider
Excellent perspectives (again).

I would daresay that most of the pregant teen Muslims would be married already (if not, they'd be disowned, or dead, or both).

And you're right that it's long past time to treat 18s and 19s consistently as adults for statistical reporting and ALL other purposes (including drinking, IMHO).

Your general ethnic point is also well-taken. Inner-city black out of wedlock rates are 80% or more in many cities. Hispanics are working on catching up but are nowhere near that level. But God forbid that we open a discussion about the out-of-wedlock differentials, because it would ultimately expose the civil-rights movement and the welfare state for the liberal plantation that it is.
96 posted on 05/09/2004 12:18:23 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Madstrider
To the extent that there is a "crisis," it involves girls 15 and younger -- not old enough to drive, not old enough to work full-time, more than 90 percent unmarried, many the victims of sexual abuse, and having at least two or three more years before they graduate high school.

I forgot to note.....almost all of these "fathers" are NOT minors and should be routinely charged with statutory rape (as should those who take the girls to get abortions instead). Why this doesn't happen is totally beyond me.

97 posted on 05/09/2004 12:21:25 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
I'm sure with some help they could point out a thing or two.
98 posted on 05/09/2004 12:25:05 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
I think you meant the "es". Or possibly the "cl".
99 posted on 05/09/2004 1:08:44 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (The Arab world's only exports are oil and b*llsh*t, and the latter far surpasses the former.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: chookter
Pistol grip ears?
100 posted on 05/09/2004 1:43:23 PM PDT by null and void (Go to red alert? Are you sure? It does mean changing the bulb...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson