Posted on 04/15/2004 2:54:31 PM PDT by kemosabe
GATLINBURG, Tenn.
A new report by the National Parks Conservation Association on the future of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park paints a dire picture.
"This park is beginning to die," said Tom Kiernan, the conservation group's president. "This assessment clearly shows the park is in danger, and its long-term viability is at risk."
High ozone levels, acid rain, continued underfunding and a proposed road on the north shore of Fontana Lake in North Carolina are combining to endanger the park's future, Kiernan said.
Much of the damage could be slowed or prevented if certain steps are taken, he said, including rigorous enforcement of the federal Clean Air Act and increasing the park's budget.
"The question is will our society and Congress step up to implement these recommendations," Kiernan said.
If the Smokies aren't protected, the negative impact on the region's economy and quality of life could be significant, he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at journalnow.com ...
There had been no previous systemic, park-wide scientific study to provide a benchmark for future recommendations for the Smokies before Wednesday's report, Kiernan said. The public was forced to rely on conflicting findings of various groups, scientists and organizations when trying to evaluate the park's ecosystem, he said.
Raw data for the report was combined from the National Park Service, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and various state agencies to gather all data that is published or unpublished on parks, Kiernan said.
"This has significant scientific credibility in the United States and is gaining it worldwide," he said. Several areas of concern were noted in the report on the Smokies. Among them are:
? Ground level ozone and acid rain "threaten the health of park visitors, staff, vegetation, soils and streams."
? Air pollution has diminished visibility from an average of 113 miles from prime viewing locations to an average of 25 miles.
? The park has an annual budget shortfall of more than $11 million, and needs another 108 new full-time positions to adequately protect resources.
? Nonnative pests and diseases are killing off Fraser firs, hemlocks, dogwoods, butternuts and beech trees.
Much of the air pollution in the Smokies is from the burning of fossil fuels, particularly those used in power plants, factories and automobiles, officials said.
Conservation association program analyst Jill Stephens and Sandy McLaughlin, a researcher at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the University of Tennessee, described the scope of the park's air-pollution problem Wednesday while at the Twin Creeks research station.
At the research station, one of three in the Smokies and Oak Ridge, 35 trees are constantly monitored by devices that check their growth, sap flow and other vital signs every half-hour, they said.
While pollutants affect vegetation throughout the park, trees that grow at higher elevations - such as spruce and firs trees - are hit especially hard, Stephens said. Also, rainfall is up to 10 times as acidic as normal precipitation in the park and fog is often 100 times more acidic, McLaughlin said.
Jim Renfro, a Park Service air-resource specialist, said that some species of plants are showing "visible leaf damage" from the pollution, while others aren't growing as well. He also noted that during the past 15 years the park has had more than 300 "bad-air days," meaning ozone levels were high enough to threaten public health.
"That's way too many," he said. "There shouldn't be any in a national park."
Experts expect the Smokies to be designated a "non-attainment" area Thursday when the EPA releases its list of areas that haven't met federal clean-air standards meant to protect public health.
Officials of the parks conservation group also are opposed to the proposed North Shore Road project, also known as the "Road to Nowhere," in Swain County, N.C. The road was started in the early 1960s, but work ended because of cost and environmental problems.
The issue appeared again in 2000 when North Carolina Rep. Charles Taylor and Sen. Jesse Helms tacked a new $16 million appropriation for the road onto a transportation bill. The conservation group contends completing the road would be costly and also inflict serious environmental damage to the park.
It has nothing to do with man's use of water, and cannot be solved by logging out the deadwood. It's just nature.
The other species of trees are not vulnerable to the beetles. In several hundred years, the only mountain trees we'll have are Oaks and Firs.
Gotta love the veracity of environazi...The park is beginning to die even though the road in only in the proposal stage!
It's the seriousness of the proposal that is causing the park to die (paraphrasing Tip O'Neill).
A road? A friggin road is gonna kill that park? Listening to a Chicken Little is of no value.
This is old news.
This is the key graf: ...a proposed road on the north shore of Fontana Lake...
The anti-development loonies are using the old excuse of "smoky" skies in the "Smoky" Mountins to prevent a road from being built.
Pleeeeeaase Believe us! Why, other people believe us!
"The park has an annual budget shortfall of more than $11 million, and needs another 108 new full-time positions to adequately protect resources."
I think I just found the source of their most dire emergency. I guess they need the government to take more of my money so they can wrap it around the trees as a protective barrier.
If there was no prior benchmark, how can they say the park is changing at all? Maybe it's getting better.
I'm all for supporting the park, but this sounds like junk science to me.
It starts with "H" and it ends with "T"...and there are seven letters in between.
This is George Bush's fault! Under Bill Clinton, ozone and acid rain disappeared (along with an intern and various other public servants).
All about the Benjamins.
Why is it then that when you compare pictures of the area from Civil War photos to modern photos, the forests there were MORE denuded in the 1860s than they are now? Why are the views from the "scenic overlooks" along the road through the park blocked by an overgrowth of trees around the pull-offs? I realize the park overlords don't want to have exposed stumps visible at the pull-offs, but dammit, you can't see through the trees anymore at the scenic overlooks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.