Posted on 04/08/2004 11:24:10 AM PDT by presidio9
Photo ops are the saving grace of many political campaigns, but Bay State Sen. John F. Kerry [related, bio] gaffed one recent opportunity - flouting Catholic doctrine by taking communion at a non-Catholic church.
The Democratic presidential candidate invited the press to services at the AME Charles Street Church in Roxbury Sunday. But the photos showed Kerry taking communion.
That, Catholics say, is a catechism no-no.
``Catholics should not receive communion in a Protestant church,'' said Sister Mary Ann Walsh of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. ``It's standard church teaching.''
Deal Hudson, publisher of the conservative Crisis Magazine, said, ``Kerry's attempts to woo the Catholic voter with such photo ops will ultimately turn off Catholics who value sincerity and honesty above superficial and vacuous symbolism.''
Kerry spokesman Michael Meehan said Kerry was merely participating in an ``ecumenical'' Christian service. ``He came at the invitation of the pastor, who invited all Christians to celebrate,'' Meehan said. ``Sen. Kerry is a Christian. He celebrated.''
Stephen Pope, a Boston College theology professor, said, ``As a matter of church law, Kerry broke the law of the church,'' but added that Kerry was in a ``no-win situation'' since taking or refusing communion would have offended someone.
Thou shalt not flub thy photo op, Sen. Kerry (Caught taking "communion" in Protestant Church)
Posted by presidio9
On News/Activism 04/08/2004 11:24:10 AM PDT with 58 comments
Boston Herald ^ | Wednesday, April 7, 2004 | David R. GuarinoKerrys Communion Controversy
Posted by NYer
On News/Activism 04/07/2004 11:30:48 AM PDT with 84 comments
CBS News ^ | April 6, 2004 | David Paul KuhnReuters PHOTO: "ROMAN CATHOLIC" John Kerry takes communion at AME Church [Is this kosher?]
Posted by RonDog
On Religion 04/04/2004 9:26:17 PM PDT with 193 comments
REUTERS photo (via the Drudge thread) ^ | April 4, 2004 | RonDog
John 11:35 - Jesus wept.
Protestant Services Question from Michael Evans on 09-11-2003: |
I have heard many people say that Catholics should not go to Protestant services, should not listen to Protestant ministers, etcetera. Is there an official Church prohibition of such things, and if such a prohibition exists, does it still apply even if the Catholic fully recognizes that the minister is not an authentic teacher of reliable Christianity? |
Answer by Catholic Answers on 10-02-2003: |
Michael-- As an ordinary rule, Catholics should not go to Protestant services because Protestant services do not satisfy a Catholic's Sunday obligation to attend Mass; because those services are not the re-presentation in time and space of Christ's eternal sacrifice on Calvary; and because frequent attendance at non-Catholic services without just cause can be a danger to one's Catholic faith. However, for just reason (e.g., weddings, funerals, non-Catholic family members' other spiritual milestones) one may consider attending a particular Protestant service as a guest, so long as one does not receive Protestant communion and so long as one also satisfies the Mass obligation at a Catholic church. Michelle Arnold |
Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list |
John Kerry's catechism of convenience:
Hugh Hewitt wonders if bishops will give him a pass
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, April 7, 2004 | Hugh Hewitt
Posted on 04/06/2004 11:01:04 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
If you know a Roman Catholic bishop or priest, please pass this along to him with a request for a response. If they don't mind, ask them to copy me on the response at hhewitt@hughhewitt.com.
John Kerry is the second most visible American right now, and the most visible self-identified Roman Catholic in the country.
The most influential newspaper in the world, the New York Times, reported on Tuesday that Kerry had issued the equivalent of a new catechism for the Roman Catholic Church. Here are the key paragraphs:
Mr. Kerry became combative when told that some conservatives were criticizing him for being a Roman Catholic who supported policies, like abortion and same-sex unions, that are at odds with Catholic teaching."
"Who are they?" he demanded of his questioner. "Name them. Are they the same legislators who vote for the death penalty, which is in contravention of Catholic teaching?"
He [John F'ing Kerry] added: "I'm not a church spokesman.
I'm a legislator running for president.
My oath is to uphold the Constitution of the United States in my public life.
My oath privately between me and God was defined in the Catholic Church by Pius XXIII and Pope Paul VI in the Vatican II......which allows for freedom of conscience for Catholics with respect to these choicesand that is exactly where I am..."
[i.e., being pro-abortion],CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread
How about we step back from taking things personally and getting offended and focus on what is truely important on a political web forum. Kerry is making his "devout Catholicism" a campaign issue while he commits a grave sin against Catholicism. Whether you personally believe that it is a sin or not, you have to understand that Kerry is supposed to.
Actually, it is an important distinction here since Sen. Kerry is claiming to be a practicing Roman Catholic. Any statements or actions that he undertakes to show that he is not conducting himself as a practicing Roman Catholic would be relevant regardless of our individual religious beliefs.
Of course, the only people that this will really matter to are the sort of people who wouldn't vote for Kerry in the first place.
I defy any Catholic to show me a teaching of Jesus that shows the participation in a sacrament to be a "sin" because of the time and place of the ceremony.
Silly. That's the equivalent of asking you to point out the word "trinity" in the Holy Bible. For that matter, point out the word "bible" in the bible.
Jesus didn't declare slavery a sin, either. What's your opinion on slavery?
Absolutely! And I agree with what you say. But I was responding to comments that went well beyond the point of the article about Kerry. If I begin to say what I think of Kerry and his abuse of just about everything, then I will get myself in trouble here!
When I am in a Catholic Church, I do not take Communion, because each and every time I happen to attend I always ask before Mass, and the Priest always says "No, but thanks for asking..." Sometimes they offer a blessing at the rail, sometimes not.
When we have Catholics in our Protestant Church, we invite them to Communion, but also offer to give them a blessing if they so desire. If they want a blessing instead of the Communion they are to present themselves at the rail with their arms folded over their chest. Thus it is between the individual and the Priest. This should be familiar territory to a Catholic when "on the road", as it were.
It is my understanding that Catholics are forbidden to receive Communion at a non-Catholic Church. Nobody should be offended by an individual keeping to the demands of his faith in this regard.
Kerry, "Actually, I was a non Catholic before I was a Catholic, before I was a Protestant I was a uh, let me repeeeeeeet that ARGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.