Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Backs Amendment Banning Gay Marriage [Live Thread 10:45 Statement]
Fox News ^ | 02.24.04

Posted on 02/24/2004 7:15:06 AM PST by Dr. Marten

Bush Backs Amendment Banning Gay Marriage

Breaking news...no details yet..


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; culturewar; fma; gaymirage; genderneutralagenda; gwb2004; homosexual; homosexualagenda; marriage; marriageamendment; prisoners; protectfamily; protectmarriage; romans1; samesexmarriage; westerncivilization
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 621-632 next last
To: mewzilla
Tell me about it. Between our Sandoval county clerk going nutty and our "An ignition interlock in every pot" House of Representatives, I've been very embarrassed for my state this last week.
21 posted on 02/24/2004 7:21:41 AM PST by CougarGA7 (Why dont the Democrats just run a ferret. It would make more sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
This man doesn't put his finger to the wind, and he takes political chances based on his convictions. I don't know if this will hurt or help him - and, I believe that he doesn't know, either - but, he is following what he believes is right.

Some will argue that the constitution shouldn't be amended willy-nilly, and will play this theme to the American voters. However, the Constitution has been amended on avg. every 10 years. It is not easy to change, but it is not in stone.

22 posted on 02/24/2004 7:22:38 AM PST by FreeAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
Kerry's whole campaign seems to be just saying the opposite of Bush. This should really force his hand.
23 posted on 02/24/2004 7:22:55 AM PST by KJacob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7
LOL. I'm from Upstate NYS and I feel your pain :)
24 posted on 02/24/2004 7:23:04 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Don't count on that at all. This is a slam dunk. There is no state I'm aware of where homosexual marriage even is close to a majority, and even CA and MA are close to a 2/3s majority against.
25 posted on 02/24/2004 7:23:04 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrack of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
He needs to come out with his own wording for the amendment

He backs the wording of the Musgrave amendment, which refuses to recognize gay marriages but leaves civil unions to the states.

26 posted on 02/24/2004 7:23:27 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7
Associated Press is saying the decision will be made on Monday morning (FOX web site) and on Wednesday morning (MSNBC web site)

AP doesn't even know what day of the week it is.
27 posted on 02/24/2004 7:24:07 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I don't suppose Ketchup Boy has made any statements about the Musgrave amendment?
28 posted on 02/24/2004 7:24:42 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: RoseofTexas
Writing a check as I speak (type)!

yeeeehaaaah!

30 posted on 02/24/2004 7:26:22 AM PST by EEDUDE (Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Well, asides from the fact this has about as much chance as becoming part of the constitution as does eliminating the electoral college, it's easy to talk about it.

Why do you say that? In "liberal" Cali, Prop 22 passed 62-38. Only the state judges can abort the will of the people. The same will happen in the rest of America.

31 posted on 02/24/2004 7:26:26 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
HoustonChronicle.com -- http://www.HoustonChronicle.com | Section: National


Feb. 24, 2004, 9:13AM

Bush to back constitutional amendment banning gay marriage

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - President Bush will back a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.

"The president will announce his support for a constitutional amendment to protect the sanctity of marriage,"  said White House spokesman Scott McClellan.

"He has always strongly believed that marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman,"  McClellan said.

He said the president wants to end "growing confusion" that has arisen from court decisions in Massachusetts, and San Francisco's permitting more than 3,000 same sex unions.

Bush is to make the announcement in the White House Roosevelt Room at 10:45 a.m. EST.

More details to come.

32 posted on 02/24/2004 7:26:59 AM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I know, but he'd look more like a leader than a follower to come up with his own language. Musgrave shouldn't come off as more of a leader than the President of the United States.
33 posted on 02/24/2004 7:27:56 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LS
I agree with you, but this will be a "rum go" as the Brits would say. If the Dems and other supporters of Same Sex Marriage successfully cast the issue in terms of Civil Rights, then the opponents of the Amendment will pick up quite a bit of tacit support. Only a small % of Americans, even in CA, MA and NY, are actually IN FAVOR of SSM, but many Americans would not want to deny anyone "basic human and civil rights." The challenge for the supporters of this amendment is to change the terms of the debate from "Civil Rights" to the Greater Good of our Children, etc.
34 posted on 02/24/2004 7:30:21 AM PST by Remole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Presidents, according to the Constitution, have nothing to say about the Amendment Process.

Yours is a technical objection; since Bush will be the first presidential candidate to back such an amendment, the vast majority of people will see it as leadership.

35 posted on 02/24/2004 7:30:26 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Why do you think gay marriage is a concern for only the "extreme" right? Sounds like something a DUmbocrat would say...
36 posted on 02/24/2004 7:30:50 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla; finnman69
I think an ammendment on this issue could really get traction. They did a poll here in New California Mexico and even here majority were against gay marriage.
37 posted on 02/24/2004 7:31:15 AM PST by CougarGA7 (Why dont the Democrats just run a ferret. It would make more sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
BREAKING: Kerry responded immediately in favor ....and against, a constitutional amemdment.
38 posted on 02/24/2004 7:31:58 AM PST by Johnstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Pure politics. The Prez can't honestly believe this is a good idea.

Like the balanced budget amendment idea, this won't solve anything.

39 posted on 02/24/2004 7:32:22 AM PST by zarf (..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
The President IS a leader. Most of us are already very much aware of that fact. Open your eyes.
40 posted on 02/24/2004 7:32:39 AM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 621-632 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson