Skip to comments.
Bush Backs Amendment Banning Gay Marriage [Live Thread 10:45 Statement]
Fox News ^
| 02.24.04
Posted on 02/24/2004 7:15:06 AM PST by Dr. Marten
Bush Backs Amendment Banning Gay Marriage
Breaking news...no details yet..
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; culturewar; fma; gaymirage; genderneutralagenda; gwb2004; homosexual; homosexualagenda; marriage; marriageamendment; prisoners; protectfamily; protectmarriage; romans1; samesexmarriage; westerncivilization
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 621-632 next last
To: Dr. Marten
You can run, Johnny, but you can't hide...
2
posted on
02/24/2004 7:15:44 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: Dr. Marten
It'll be formally announced in about a half an hour (10:45 EST).
3
posted on
02/24/2004 7:16:32 AM PST
by
Catspaw
To: Dr. Marten
President Bush will be making a statement at 10:45 Eastern, about a half hour from now.
4
posted on
02/24/2004 7:17:03 AM PST
by
jackbill
To: Dr. Marten
Good news. I hope he talks to the Congress-critters soon about fine-tuning the amendment. We shouldn't allow civil unions for gays either - period.
5
posted on
02/24/2004 7:17:13 AM PST
by
Pyro7480
("We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid" - Benjamin Franklin)
To: Dr. Marten
I wonder if the extreme right will still sit at home and still pout?
6
posted on
02/24/2004 7:17:31 AM PST
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: Catspaw
It's gonna be fun to see how Kerry handles this one...
7
posted on
02/24/2004 7:17:31 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: Dr. Marten
So....no difference between Bush and the democrats some say....
8
posted on
02/24/2004 7:17:57 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: mewzilla
He had not yet made a decision to back the ammendment process but I think the actions of the pro-gay mayor in SF might have just broke the straw on the camels back.
9
posted on
02/24/2004 7:18:06 AM PST
by
Dr. Marten
(Treason...How can such a small word mean so little to so many?)
To: Pyro7480
civil unions may have to be left to the states to decide
10
posted on
02/24/2004 7:18:12 AM PST
by
mwl1
To: Dr. Marten
Oh my this is REALLLY going to infuriated the QUEER LIBERAL MEDIA RATS!! Hold on to your hats folks it's going to get REALLLLY wild! Hmmmm...our W needs more moola, I think I'll write ANOTHER check!! BRB! :)
To: Dr. Marten
SF, NM, MA...Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
12
posted on
02/24/2004 7:19:04 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: Pyro7480
Well, asides from the fact this has about as much chance as becoming part of the constitution as does eliminating the electoral college, it's easy to talk about it.
13
posted on
02/24/2004 7:19:08 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: mewzilla
This is one vote this summer that Kerry cannot duck... if he does, it becomes a huge campaign issue for the GOP... more of the hypocritical prevaracation.
14
posted on
02/24/2004 7:19:27 AM PST
by
mwl1
To: Dr. Marten
ARGH! I wish the media would quit calling this an ammendment to "ban" gay marriage. Gay weddings will be legal either way, as they should be in any society with religious liberty.
What will be different is that if this amendment is passed, homosexuals will not be able to use the physical force of government to force others to recognize the moral legitimacy of their relationships.
To: Catspaw
I hope he addresses the bigger issue of renegade elected officials breaking the rule of law.
16
posted on
02/24/2004 7:20:06 AM PST
by
rintense
To: finnman69
"So....no difference between Bush and the democrats some say...."
How so? Last time I checked, the Dems were gay supporters.
17
posted on
02/24/2004 7:20:07 AM PST
by
Dr. Marten
(Treason...How can such a small word mean so little to so many?)
To: Dr. Marten
He needs to come out with his own wording for the amendment. That will make him look proactive and not reactive.
18
posted on
02/24/2004 7:20:10 AM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: mwl1
Both civil unions and marriages. But the Dems want the whole hog, federal recognition. And they ain't gonna get it.
19
posted on
02/24/2004 7:20:20 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: Dr. Marten
About time. He should have gone to San Francisco and annoucned his support for it on the court house steps. That would have really ticked off the liberals.
20
posted on
02/24/2004 7:20:55 AM PST
by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 621-632 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson