Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A scholar argues that Bush's doctrine of preemption has deep roots in American history
Boston.Com ^ | 8 February 2004 | Laura Secor, Globe Staff, 2/8/2004

Posted on 02/10/2004 5:44:07 AM PST by shrinkermd

Grand strategy is the blueprint from which policy follows. It envisions a country's mission, defines its interests, and sets its priorities. Part of grand strategy's grandeur lies in its durability: A single grand strategy can shape decades, even centuries, of policy.

Who, then, have been the great grand strategists among American statesmen? According to a slim forthcoming volume by John Lewis Gaddis, the Yale historian whom many describe as the dean of Cold War studies and one of the nation's most eminent diplomatic historians, they are John Quincy Adams, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and George W. Bush.

Gaddis knows the latter name may bring a number of his colleagues up short. Critics charge that President Bush is a lightweight, Gaddis laments, and they do so because the president is a generalist who prefers the big picture to its details. Over lunch at Mory's, Yale's tweedy private dining club, Gaddis suggests that academics underrate Bush because they overvalue specialized knowledge. In reality, as his new book asserts, after Sept. 11, 2001, Bush underwent "one of the most surprising transformations of an underrated national leader since Prince Hal became Henry V."

The Bush doctrine is more serious and sophisticated than its critics acknowledge -- but it is also less novel, Gaddis maintains. Three of its core principles -- preemptive war, unilateralism, and American hegemony -- actually hark back to the early 19th century, to the time of John Quincy Adams.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrine; cfr; coldwar; fdr; gaddis; grand; gwbush; jqadams; preemption; strategists
I couldn't agree more. I had to excerpt this since it may be one of the organizations FR agreed to do this for.
1 posted on 02/10/2004 5:44:09 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
the president is a generalist who prefers the big picture to its details

Exactly what a president is supposed to do. That's why Reagan was great, and Clinton was a disaster. George W. Bush is a great president.

2 posted on 02/10/2004 5:53:48 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (You can see it coming like a train on a track)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
This is something that most people don't think about. MBAs are taught this (or something similar) in their first few classes.
Vision >> Goals >> Strategies >> Tactics >> Projects
Everything flows from Vision; this is the "Grand Strategy" that the authors are alluding to.

No doubt that Bush's MBA is playing a role.

3 posted on 02/10/2004 5:55:16 AM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Historians don't come better than John Gaddis. He is not afraid to permit new realities to shape his vision, unlike those such as Williams. whose reality was colored by his vision.
4 posted on 02/10/2004 5:58:38 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
A poster on a thread the other day was sneering at the fact that President Bush was a history major at Yale. I didn't know that he was, but this person seemed certain of it and was not impressed.

I am impressed because I think being a history major with an MBA is an excellent qualification for president.
5 posted on 02/10/2004 6:07:46 AM PST by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
This author is right on! The strategy involves much more than WMD - though they are a factor. Bush's "style" is especially right for the Presidency. Jimmy Carter and others who were smart were also detail folks -- and failed, in part, because they were bogged down in details.
6 posted on 02/10/2004 6:21:43 AM PST by RAY ((Right or wrong, its my country!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
I've felt that this war on terrorism has an awful lot of parallels with Jefferson's war on the barbary pirates.
7 posted on 02/10/2004 6:30:13 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
SPOTREP - HISTORY - WAR - FOREIGN POLICY
8 posted on 02/10/2004 6:48:04 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
I don't know if Professor Gaddis has written about immediate aftermath of WW II. Since I am old and decrepit, I can remember how the Marshall Plan was pilloried. At its inception 70-80% were against any kind of "foreign aid."

Also, I wish I had a reference for it, but in 1937 or 38 there was a move afoot to block FDR's incipient rearming and other war efforts. A poll was taken to support a plebiscite where the government would need a majority of citizens before war could be declared. I remember my father telling me the constitutional amendment lost by only one or two votes. If this is a correct memory, can you imagine what would have happened. At least in the Midwest until 7 December 1941 there was a strong aversion to war such that it is problematical we would have even immediately joined the war against Germany--Hitler solved this by declaring war on us.

9 posted on 02/10/2004 6:48:23 AM PST by shrinkermd (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: texasflower
I think being a history major with an MBA is an excellent qualification for president.

I agree (probably because I have almost the exact same educational background).

A poster on a thread the other day was sneering at the fact that President Bush was a history major at Yale

Funny that the poster the other day forgot to include that the President has an MBA from Havard Business School, which is famously difficult (as has been recounted here on FR by FREEPERS who have gone there or are going there).

10 posted on 02/10/2004 7:00:08 AM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RAY
It is the simple difference between a "policy wonk" and a leader. Leaders know when to get the hell out of the way of the people who know how to do their jobs.
11 posted on 02/10/2004 7:02:31 AM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Bush's doctrine of preemption

The right to self defense begins at the individual level and extends -- from there -- to national levels, and that right to self defense is what I'd call natural law.

In other words, preemptive strikes against rogue individuals takes precedence over sovereign national rights whenever such individuals are harbored by a nation.

There can be no such thing as sanctuary for individuals in a war against terrorists.

12 posted on 02/10/2004 7:09:54 AM PST by thinktwice (The human mind is blessed with reason, and to waste that blessed mind is treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
MBAs are taught this on a large scale, that is why they are the right type of people to lead existing organizations. not as good at start ups and very small companies.

President Bush is proof that he did not skip class at Harvard and had changed his focus after flying jets. His oil career may be less than spectacular, but he changed the day to day world of the Texas Rangers using many of the same managment ideas he is using in the government.

13 posted on 02/10/2004 7:30:03 AM PST by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
I think being a history major with an MBA is an excellent qualification for president.

I agree (probably because I have almost the exact same educational background).


Okay, you can be president NEXT TIME. That is really an impressive educational accomplishment!

I did read some of those other threads talking about the Harvard MBA. It sounds really tough. I was glad to see so many people speaking out about how tough it is.
14 posted on 02/10/2004 7:32:58 AM PST by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
MBAs are taught this on a large scale, that is why they are the right type of people to lead existing organizations. not as good at start ups and very small companies.

Well, I agree and disagree.

You are totally right about leadership in existing organizations; having an MBA who can provide this big picture thinking is an absolute necessity. Most of the time, bigger businesses suffer from a multitude of problems that can only be seen in the big picture. Every little problem seems to be dire. It takes a leader and someone with a grip on all (or most) of the aspects of business to prioritize things and set the priorities.

I disagree because I have an MBA and I own a small business owner. And, while I'll admit that my businesses is still getting off the ground, I apply almost everything I learned while doing my MBA.

...but he changed the day to day world of the Texas Rangers using many of the same managment ideas he is using in the government.

You are totally right about this. His turnaround of the Rangers is really a blueprint that others have used to help turn their clubs around. This goes beyond baseball. You look at all of recent changes in football stadiums and the hospitality-focused approach that the clubs have and that is largely credited to what Bush and the Texas Rangers organization did.

Now, I am not saying that "Bush is the greatest businessmen of all time!" or anything like that. However, he was noted amongst the other baseball owners as a very active and innovative owner. He is astute. A lot more astute than anyone on the left will admit...that is, of course, unless they are indicting him for being the most evil, diabolical man to walk the face of the earth. Then, they seem to be glowing (red hot) in his ability to manipulate the American psyche.

15 posted on 02/10/2004 7:42:41 AM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: texasflower
Okay, you can be president NEXT TIME.

Umm, no thanks. I might have a "little" problem with the press.

I don't think I would make it past the first press conference before ripping the heads off of the representatives from CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, AP, Reuters, etc. I MEAN CLEAN OFF! I WOULD RIP THEIR HEADS OFF AND...

[Regains composure]. Ehem, like I said, uh, no thanks. <wink>

16 posted on 02/10/2004 7:45:44 AM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
DUH!

"...I own am a small business owner"

17 posted on 02/10/2004 7:49:51 AM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
Then you DEFINATELY would have my vote! mattdono in 2008!


(BTW, great homepage.)
18 posted on 02/10/2004 8:00:54 AM PST by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: texasflower
Then you DEFINATELY would have my vote! mattdono in 2008!

LOL! Cool. At least I know that "magic" formula for getting votes. LOL! (again).

(BTW, great homepage.)

Thank you. I try to keep it up to date and interesting.

P.S. Your comment about my homepage made me think of a project I announced just yesterday called my email jihad.

Here is a link to the post describing what it is. Let me know what you think and if you want to join the jihad.

19 posted on 02/10/2004 8:12:21 AM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson