Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I couldn't agree more. I had to excerpt this since it may be one of the organizations FR agreed to do this for.
1 posted on 02/10/2004 5:44:09 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: shrinkermd
the president is a generalist who prefers the big picture to its details

Exactly what a president is supposed to do. That's why Reagan was great, and Clinton was a disaster. George W. Bush is a great president.

2 posted on 02/10/2004 5:53:48 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (You can see it coming like a train on a track)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
This is something that most people don't think about. MBAs are taught this (or something similar) in their first few classes.
Vision >> Goals >> Strategies >> Tactics >> Projects
Everything flows from Vision; this is the "Grand Strategy" that the authors are alluding to.

No doubt that Bush's MBA is playing a role.

3 posted on 02/10/2004 5:55:16 AM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
Historians don't come better than John Gaddis. He is not afraid to permit new realities to shape his vision, unlike those such as Williams. whose reality was colored by his vision.
4 posted on 02/10/2004 5:58:38 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
This author is right on! The strategy involves much more than WMD - though they are a factor. Bush's "style" is especially right for the Presidency. Jimmy Carter and others who were smart were also detail folks -- and failed, in part, because they were bogged down in details.
6 posted on 02/10/2004 6:21:43 AM PST by RAY ((Right or wrong, its my country!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
I've felt that this war on terrorism has an awful lot of parallels with Jefferson's war on the barbary pirates.
7 posted on 02/10/2004 6:30:13 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
SPOTREP - HISTORY - WAR - FOREIGN POLICY
8 posted on 02/10/2004 6:48:04 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
Bush's doctrine of preemption

The right to self defense begins at the individual level and extends -- from there -- to national levels, and that right to self defense is what I'd call natural law.

In other words, preemptive strikes against rogue individuals takes precedence over sovereign national rights whenever such individuals are harbored by a nation.

There can be no such thing as sanctuary for individuals in a war against terrorists.

12 posted on 02/10/2004 7:09:54 AM PST by thinktwice (The human mind is blessed with reason, and to waste that blessed mind is treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson