Skip to comments.
Clinton & Clinton - To maintain their hold on the party, Howard Dean had to be destroyed
Wall Street Journal Opinion ^
| February 1, 2004
| EMMETT TYRRELL JR.
Posted on 02/01/2004 12:50:37 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:06:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
So, no sooner does Sen. John Kerry emerge from the New Hampshire primary as the Democrats' fragile front-runner than word gets out that Bill Clinton was flying down to Washington to plan the Democrats' return to the White House, and at this "high level" meeting Sen. Hillary Clinton would join him. What is this all about? Are the Democratic presidential contenders not capable of sorting things out on their own? Two, after all, were coaxed into the race by the Clintons, Sen. John Edwards and Gen. Wesley Clark.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; 2008; clintons; democrat; impeachedx42; politics; primary; remmetttyrrelljr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Soooo .. you're saying the $250 mil is from a pool of organizations ..??
Okay, I can see that. Thanks!
21
posted on
02/01/2004 1:57:47 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
To: Prince Charles
Too bad the sheeple can't see that.They don't follow politics and/or have short memories, so they're perfect fodder for the Clintons.
To: MEG33
And that makes them Soro's best friends and allies.
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
I read a thread yesterday called "100 Reasons to Elect Bush" and it was really chilling!It was about all the dead people, mostly from suicides, drive by shootings and plane crashes that the Clintons have left in their wake. And not surprisingly sloppy investigations or no investigations at all. It is truly a nightmare!
To: HAL9000
While that may be true .. think about this: As a Chief justice, in order to get the laws passed, she has to have a majority of the group on her side .. and that's not always a reasonable assumption. Also .. like I said .. as President she can RULE BY EXECUTIVE ORDER - AND CHANGE LAWS WITH THE STROKE OF HER PEN.
For a power hungry person .. which would you choose ..??
25
posted on
02/01/2004 2:01:36 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
To: MEG33
President's CHANGE LAWS WITH THE STROKE OF A PEN!!
26
posted on
02/01/2004 2:02:53 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
To: Cincinatus' Wife
.........VOTE 3rd PARTY OR DON'T VOTE AT ALL
.........ELECT A DEMOCRAT FOR PRESIDENT IN '04
27
posted on
02/01/2004 2:04:15 AM PST
by
MEG33
(God bless our armed forces)
To: CyberAnt
Maybe after she's President,the dem Senate will appoint her!
28
posted on
02/01/2004 2:05:35 AM PST
by
MEG33
(God bless our armed forces)
To: Cincinatus' Wife; Waywardson
Great reporting and great analysis by Mr. Tyrrell.
This article is a true window into recent events.
To: EternalVigilance
Tyrrell Bump!
To: CyberAnt
Yeah she wants to be president and eventually (shudder) secretary general of the UN after the Clintons have handed our soveriegnity over to them.
To: MEG33
While our"true conservatives" rail against the President and want to teach him a lesson,Soros,the one worlders,the mighty left wing and the yellow dog dems are working hard to defeat Bush also. Or a person could look at it another way: while all of those leftist Democrats work hard defeat Bush, liberal Republicans rail against 'true conservatives'.
To: EternalVigilance
Or one could say, "If we don't hang together, we'll hang separately." - Ben Franklin, after signing the Declaration of Independence.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
if the witch ever gets on the ballot in florida, they should change her name to "chad" and let her hang!!!
To: EternalVigilance
Yes but the world has changed. Us true conservatives have got to do what we have to do to keep Bush in the white house. We can always move the party back to the right but if the Clintons ever get their foot in the door it will be over.
To: cajun-jack
Ha! There are so many ways to go with that, I don't know where to begin.
To: EternalVigilance
I don't rail against rattling the Republican representatives cages,disagreeing with lack of border enforcement,or overspending,taking the President to task over any number of things.
Read my posts.I do rail against third party, no vote,sit homers.I don't believe it is in the best interest of the country to have a dem President in charge of national security,immigration or the budget.
37
posted on
02/01/2004 2:17:00 AM PST
by
MEG33
(God bless our armed forces)
To: beckysueb
We can always move the party back to the right but if the Clintons ever get their foot in the door it will be over.Bush is doing that now. Just as Ronald Reagan could see the importance of winning the Cold War, Bush can see the importance of winning the war against terrorism, or one could say the war against America. If spending increases to keep him in power, that's what needs to be done. The deficit will go down (like our taxes are), it always does. I wonder about these so-called conservative Bush haters. Who are they really?
To: beckysueb
Us true conservatives have got to do what we have to do to keep Bush in the white house. We can always move the party back to the right but if the Clintons ever get their foot in the door it will be over. I totally agree.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Thats exactly what I was trying to say. Thank you for saying it so well!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-140 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson