To: EternalVigilance
I don't rail against rattling the Republican representatives cages,disagreeing with lack of border enforcement,or overspending,taking the President to task over any number of things.
Read my posts.I do rail against third party, no vote,sit homers.I don't believe it is in the best interest of the country to have a dem President in charge of national security,immigration or the budget.
37 posted on
02/01/2004 2:17:00 AM PST by
MEG33
(God bless our armed forces)
To: MEG33
I don't rail against rattling the Republican representatives cages,disagreeing with lack of border enforcement,or overspending,taking the President to task over any number of things.Read my posts.I do rail against third party, no vote,sit homers.I don't believe it is in the best interest of the country to have a dem President in charge of national security,immigration or the budget.
Okay. I gotcha.
I disagree strenuously with those who counsel abandonment of the GOP, and claim that somehow a RAT presidency would be a positive thing in any way at all.
But I also hate it when liberals in the party use that excuse to beat up on conservatives or conservatism in general.
Both things are going on right now.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson