Skip to comments.
Clinton & Clinton - To maintain their hold on the party, Howard Dean had to be destroyed
Wall Street Journal Opinion ^
| February 1, 2004
| EMMETT TYRRELL JR.
Posted on 02/01/2004 12:50:37 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:06:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: HAL9000
The Clintoon's actions have been confusing to me. I was assuming that they wanted Hill as Pres.
But maybe they realize that won't happen, she cannot be elected.
But she sure can be appointed as Chief Justice.
An interesting, albeit terrifying, idea.
Thanks for the post.
41
posted on
02/01/2004 2:22:42 AM PST
by
auntdot
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Or one could say, "If we don't hang together, we'll hang separately." - Ben Franklin, after signing the Declaration of Independence. Some truths are timeless. :-)
To: MEG33
I don't rail against rattling the Republican representatives cages,disagreeing with lack of border enforcement,or overspending,taking the President to task over any number of things.Read my posts.I do rail against third party, no vote,sit homers.I don't believe it is in the best interest of the country to have a dem President in charge of national security,immigration or the budget.
Okay. I gotcha.
I disagree strenuously with those who counsel abandonment of the GOP, and claim that somehow a RAT presidency would be a positive thing in any way at all.
But I also hate it when liberals in the party use that excuse to beat up on conservatives or conservatism in general.
Both things are going on right now.
To: auntdot
I'm assuming they wanted Hill as Pres. I think their ultimate goal is one world order and Hitlery in charge. Than they will go after Christains and whoever doesn't agree with them.
To: beckysueb
One more thing about this article. Could Tha Deanster have been told maybe to back off a bit or take a dirt bath? He seems like the steam has gone out of him.
To: beckysueb
Actually, it's Bill who wants to be Secretary General of the UN (why do you think he's been doing so much globe trotting) .. while Hillary is President of the USA. In collusion, they could destroy America, and turn it into a Socialist State.
46
posted on
02/01/2004 2:37:30 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
To: beckysueb
Politically speaking, he IS 'taking a dirt bath'.
To: CyberAnt
I always thought she wanted to be in charge and that she just used Bill to get where she wants to go.
To: EternalVigilance
I want them to reconsider(the ones who aren't tied to a third party already..and some definitely are)I don't wish to alienate the possibles.
I do say what the result will be to not vote or to vote 3rd party.I certainly don't think it is the only reason to vote for Bush.
It is the truth that if enough conservatives bolt, a dem President is the result.If they find that acceptable it should not be offensive or insulting..
49
posted on
02/01/2004 2:44:42 AM PST
by
MEG33
(God bless our armed forces)
To: Cincinatus' Wife; MEG33
Look, Bush is a lock in 2004. Don't you worry none. If Hillary does any VP or Presidential candidatin', its to preserve her viability in 2008, only.
To: EternalVigilance; beckysueb
Bump!
To: Lazamataz
See my post above.If enough stay home or vote 3rd party,a dem will be President.I'm still working on the angry but possibles.Kerry for President gives me nightmares!
52
posted on
02/01/2004 2:49:29 AM PST
by
MEG33
(God bless our armed forces)
To: MEG33
It ain't gonna happen. It's Bush in 2004. He's picking up 2X as many liberals in the center as he is losing conservaitves. I can see Roves hand in this.
To: beckysueb
Well .. if they're going to rule the world, that's the only way it can be done. Besides, I cannot imagine him allowing her to be in a higher position than he's in; ego you know.
54
posted on
02/01/2004 2:52:42 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Good article. Thanks
Having read the posters replies [as far as # 44] and the idiocy accompanying some of them, such as Hillary appointed to the Supreme Court, I must withdraw.
55
posted on
02/01/2004 2:53:57 AM PST
by
G.Mason
("The secret to success is knowing who to blame for your failures" - Old Democrat saying)
To: HAL9000
But don't Supreme Court justices still have to be confirmed by the Senate? If so, I can't imagine that happening after the Democrats' behavior regarding the nomination of Estrada, Pickering, etc.
To: MEG33
You mean after her term as President, she would get appointed to the Supreme Court ..??
Well maybe .. but I just don't see her in that position; not enough power.
57
posted on
02/01/2004 2:56:28 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
To: Lazamataz
I just don't believe it.The last election Bush lost the total vote and all it takes is all the states Gore won and a Florida or equally high electoral vote state.I have never thought Bush had a lock.
58
posted on
02/01/2004 2:56:31 AM PST
by
MEG33
(God bless our armed forces)
To: CyberAnt
But her ambition and determination is stronger than his ego.
To: CyberAnt
I hope you are right.Decades of Hillary..Gag
60
posted on
02/01/2004 3:00:11 AM PST
by
MEG33
(God bless our armed forces)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-140 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson