Skip to comments.
Brit Hume: Special Report [Excellent Analysis of 2004 Elections]
FoxNews ^
| 1-01-04
| FoxNews
Posted on 01/01/2004 4:22:27 PM PST by Salvation
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:38:14 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; democrats; elections; governors; house; president; republicans; senate; south
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: Mr. Thorne
**wouldn't you like to see O'Reilly get slapped down by Hume?**
LOL just at the thought of it.
21
posted on
01/01/2004 4:45:56 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Salvation
What I got from the consensus is that House to stay Republican with an increase up to a total of 230-240, with 5 pickups very likely. Senate POSSIBLE 55 but staying in the Republican column. Two net likely. GW will remain President barring a double dip recession OR Iraq going very badly.
22
posted on
01/01/2004 4:46:00 PM PST
by
PISANO
(God Bless our Troops........They will not TIRE - They will not FALTER - They will not FAIL!!!!!)
To: billorites
All roads lead to Ohio. Bush and the Dem nominee will set up shop in Columbus, and never leave, except for forays into the adjacent rust belt, Michigan, West Virgina and Pennslyvania, and into the fat belt, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. For this campaign cycle, one will hardly need a plane.
Oh yes, I don't think Florida will be in play much. If Dean is the nominee, he will need to pick off New Hampshire, and then think up some other sizable state to grab, or some mini states. I am not sure what state(s) those would be.
23
posted on
01/01/2004 4:46:29 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
**Edwards and Graham, and Illinois**
Thanks, Torie!
24
posted on
01/01/2004 4:46:46 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Salvation
Excellent and realistic projections!
25
posted on
01/01/2004 4:47:23 PM PST
by
Alissa
To: Torie
**and Daschle in SD,**
I was amazed that his name did not come up!
26
posted on
01/01/2004 4:47:27 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Peach
O'Reilly is terrible; I can't watch more than five minutes of his show.
One day soon, O'reilly's ego is going to cause his bigheadedness to explode---and innocent bystanders might be hurt.
27
posted on
01/01/2004 4:48:33 PM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Mike Fieschko
Thanks, Mike; you and Torie both helped me. (If I had taken more time I could have remembered them -- right? LOL!)
28
posted on
01/01/2004 4:48:47 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: TomGuy
They seemed to have a concensus of opinion that the Republicans would not get close to getting a 60 majority, but would get maybe 54 or 55.If the President were to make the composition of the Senate a major issue this year, I believe an aggressive recruitment of quality GOP candidates could tally a 57 ot 58 GOP majority.
The 5 southern Democrat retirements are the GOP's to lose - and that's just the start.
Reid in Nevada is beatable.
So is Lincoln in Arkansas and Murray in Washington.
If the President's coattails are of historical proportions as I guess, Daschle is also toast.
And there might be a couple of upsets either way.
We need to encourage JC Watts to step up to the Senate and hold onto Nickles' seat.
How great would it be to see Watts and Herman Cain in Georgia both win Senate seats!!
History might be made this year.
I'll be working hard, that's for sure.
29
posted on
01/01/2004 4:49:16 PM PST
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
To: TomGuy
LOL. His head may explode at the same time as Dean's and there will be a seismic shift in the earth's rotation.
30
posted on
01/01/2004 4:49:30 PM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: secret garden
midnight EST
31
posted on
01/01/2004 4:49:52 PM PST
by
clintonh8r
(You know that KoolAid the RATs have been drinking? Well, I'm the guy who's been pissing in it.)
To: PISANO
**House to stay Republican with an increase up to a total of 230-240,**
Barone was saying this, and I wondered if it wasn't a little on the high side.
32
posted on
01/01/2004 4:50:32 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Salvation
Stuart Rothenberg in a recent CSPAN session at American University included Dashle (the ferret) in the "first tier" along with the vacant southern seats.
With a 60-40 Bush win in SD... I think Dashle can be taken!!
(Also have to disagree with Barone if he said Okla was a Dem pick-up....I don't think it will be).
33
posted on
01/01/2004 4:50:53 PM PST
by
Amish
To: TomGuy
They seemed to have a concensus of opinion that the Republicans would not get close to getting a 60 majority, but would get maybe 54 or 55. This could allow the Dems to continue their obstructionism, unless the Senate Republicans find and elect some leaders with steel, not cotton, 'thingies'.The problem is not the leadership (at least, not this problem).
The problem is that all of the RAT senators, Miller possibly excepted, are committed warriors for socialism and centralization.
The GOP caucus is much more diverse. Even IF there were 60 Republican senators after 1/6/05, I doubt they could or would break RAT filibusters-because there are at least ten proabortion Republican senators (and probably more) who will not countenance the nomination of judges who will uphold the Constitution.
To: PISANO
**GW will remain President barring a double dip recession OR Iraq going very badly.**
Brit always does the unexpected. The question at the end about how all of these predictions might be changed through an event was a good one.
35
posted on
01/01/2004 4:52:07 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Amish
Rothenberg was certainly a friendly and engaging and dynamic speaker wasn't he? His former students at Bucknell were lucky to have him as a prof. He probably gave birth to a whole pack of political junkies, for better or worse, for them and us.
36
posted on
01/01/2004 4:53:44 PM PST
by
Torie
To: KC_Conspirator
lying hacks like Katrina VanDen HaterWhat made that woman such a hate-filled witch?
If she is married, I feel sorry for her husband.
37
posted on
01/01/2004 4:54:15 PM PST
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
**How great would it be to see Watts and Herman Cain in Georgia both win Senate seats!!**
They also talked about two Republican black candidates who could win in the House. I wasn't familiar with either name.
38
posted on
01/01/2004 4:54:26 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Amish
**Okla was a Dem pick-up....**
He was speaking of the likability of the Dem candidate, well-known, etc.
39
posted on
01/01/2004 4:55:59 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: LS
Illinois has always been a democrat leaning state due to the amount of democrats in Chicago. The rest of the state is Republican. The problem there is that the old Republican Governor Ryan is going to jail on corruption charges and its affecting the whole state party.
As for Arkansas, you have to understand that the state has historically been dominated by democrats since the civil war. Besides, Louisiana, no other state has been dominated and corrupted as Arkansas has been. In fact the amazing thing is that Republicans have won in that state in recent years.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson