Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zoroastrians Fight Extinction
VOANews ^ | 12/23/03 | VOANews

Posted on 12/23/2003 10:01:12 PM PST by freedom44

The opening bars of Richard Strauss’ composition “Thus Spoke Zarathustra” became famous as the theme for Stanle Kubrick’s 1968 movie “2001: A Space Odyssey.” But apart from academics and some 300-thosuand believers, few people know much about ancient Iranian prophet Zarathustra and his teaching.

“Yet only one thousand years ago, millions, millions espoused Zarathustra’s monotheistic percepts in nations which stretched from (the ancient Chinese city of) Sian (western China) to the Eastern China across central Asia, northern India, Iran, Asia Minor, Mesopotamia up Greece in the west and Arabia, north Africa and Ethiopia in the south,” says Adi Davar, a board member of the World Zoroastrian Organization. Mr. Davar spoke at a recent seminar on Zoroastrian religion at the Library of Congress in Washington.

Zoroastrianism is based on the revelations of the Persian prophet Zarathustra, or Zoroaster in Greek. He taught that the world and everything in it was created by a Wise Lord, or Ahura Mazda. Before Zarathustra, Persians believed in multiple deities, as did most nomadic tribes at the time.

Stanley Isler, chairman of Iranian studies at Yale University, says Zarathustra was very impressed with nature and its ability for cyclical renewal. He believed repetition was the basis of knowledge, and people could learn everything from nature.

“Surely, only a being of great power and wisdom was capable of fashioning the element of the cosmos and equally capable of creating the principle of truth that maintain their eternal design and rhythms,” cites Professor Isler.

Internationally renowned conductor Zubin Mehta is a Parsi from Bombay. Creator Ahura Mazda is symbolized by light and fire, nature’s sources of life and energy. That is why Zoroastrians usually pray before a source of light, and an urn containing fire is a prominent feature of their place of worship. The good and wise lord Ahura Mazda is opposed by dark forces of evil. Zoroastrians believe truth is the source of all good and must be pursued in order to fight deceit, the source of evil. Since humans are created by a wise lord, they have an innate ability to discern good from evil. Zarathustra preaches three basic virtues: good thoughts, good words and good deeds. He says: "Happiness unto him who gives happiness unto others.” Thus Zoroastrians value education and philanthropy. Lying, or deceit, represents a violation of basic Zoroastrian beliefs.

Cleanliness of the body as well as of the spirit is also very important. Dead and decaying bodies are considered extremely impure and so they must not contaminate water, air or earth, which are sources of life. Traditionally, Zoroastrians do not bury or burn dead bodies or throw them into water, but expose them to vultures. However, there is less emphasis on religious rites than there is on lifestyle choices.

Marriage is a lifelong commitment, often postponed for the sake of education. Inter-faith marriages and conversions have long been avoided, contributing to the decline in population. The conquest of Persia and spread of Islam, which started in the 7th century, dealt the first serious blow to Zoroastrians.

Relief depicting Persian King Darius, Iran. No one knows exactly when Zarathustra lived, but his origins are traditionally placed in the 6th century B.C. in the area of what is today north-eastern Iran. This would make him a contemporary of the Persians kings Cyrus or Darius. Many scholars think he lived earlier than that. Jehan Bagli, president of the North American Zoroastrian Council, says Zarathustra’s teachings were already widespread by that time.

“Nowhere in these records do we find the mention of prophet Zarathustra,” says Mr. Bagli. “If the prophet was born 569 BCE and lived, as we know from the tradition, a little over 77 years, he would be contemporary with Darius the Great. It is inconceivable that the founder of the first monotheistic faith, who lived during the same time as these renowned monarchs, whose religion was spread across their vast empire and who was a mentor of the father of Darius, be so trivially overlooked.” Mr Bagli adds: “These circumstances certainly invalidate the traditional date.”

Scholars say historic records of Zarathustra’s life may have been destroyed during two major invasions of Persia: one by Alexander the Great in 4th century B.C. and the other by Islamic tribes in the 7th century A.D. On both occasions fire temples and religious texts were burnt and many priests killed.

But there is evidence that the Avesta, the Zoroastrian equivalent of the Bible, contains Zarathustra’s original thoughts. Stanley Isler says the prophet’s hymns to God, or “gathas,” reveal much about his life and time: “He tells us that he was a priest and a master of sacred words, a manthran – someone who has power over the mantras, a word that’s familiar to many. Yet, Zarathustra goes on to say he was rejected from his tribe and his community and driven from his land, forcing him to wander far and wide under great hardship and despair until finally he was accepted by a noble prince named Vishtaspa, who became his patron and ally.”

Professor Isler notes the hymns also explain why the prophet’s own tribe exiled him. It was not only because he preached monotheism: “He bitterly complains that evil rulers attacked just and innocent people, that the rich robbed the poor, that judges produced false decisions in order to aid their benefactors. And Zarathustra goes on to say that fury and violence terrorized the peoples on all fronts and that everywhere deceit and deception seemed to hold the upper hand.”

The holy book also contains Zoroastrian prayers, rules of law and rituals. Until the 9th century AD, the Avesta was probably transmitted orally and modified along the way. Professor Isler says this makes it hard to discern truth from myth about the prophet. The 10th century persecution of Zoroastrians in Persia forced many either to convert or seek another place to live. A significant group settled in north-western India where they became known as Parsis, meaning Persians.

For a while, Parsis were growing in number and power. The city of Bombay became the center of Zoroastrianism, somewhat like Rome in the Catholic Church. But in the second half of the 20th century, the population of the Parsi-Zoroastrians fell by one third, from a peak of 114,000 in 1941 to 76,000 in 1991. In recent decades, Zoroastrians worldwide began forming local and international organizations and events to help fight their extinction. Adi Davar helped form one of these in 1980.

“The World Zoroastrian Organization is an international organization of the global community of some 300-thousand Zoroastrians,” says Mr. Davar and adds: “Some 40-thousand of them live in North America and about a thousand in this metropolitan area.”

Parsi children in Bombay. Zoroastrian organizations prevailed upon UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization to proclaim the year 2003 as the 3000th Anniversary of Zoroastrianism. More attention is paid to young people who may be able to pass on their religion and culture to following generations. The Third World Zoroastrian Youth Congress is to take place in Pune, India, from December 27 to December 31.

Conversion, once rejected by the Zoroastrian faith, is now believed to be legitimate and indeed necessary by some adherents, who also approve marriage with members of other faiths.

Scholars have acknowledged the contribution of this ancient Persian faith to the world’s religions. Zoroastrians say their prophet’s teachings are just as relevant today since deceit, violence and oppression are as prevalent as they were thousands of years ago.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: archaeology; faith; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; iran; mrirangen; wethreekings; zoroaster; zoroastrianism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 next last
To: Cronos
I have to leave for a two day trip in half an hour. I would be glad to discuss this when I come back, if you're still around. Have been a student of the Vedas for more than 30 years, if you're interested in a Vedic perspective - not just scholarly (I wouldn't call myself in any way a scholar, I don't read Sanskrit) but a student.
101 posted on 12/29/2003 7:43:07 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
That would be good. Have a safe trip and hope to hear from you after.
102 posted on 12/29/2003 7:48:41 AM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Yeah, most of those fantasies of Roman power spreading east are just that, fantasies, they didn't happen so that's it. What I mean federated is similar to what the Romans tried to do under Domitian -- have two Imperators.

I see what you mean. I think you're thinking of Diocletian, BTW, not Domitian.

Well, what I have studied is that Roman gods like Jupiter etc. ARE Roman in ORIGIN but took on the aspect of Greek gods when the Roman presence spread south to Neapoli (Naples).

The Romans and Etruscans were never that great at art, so Roman images of what their deities looked like quickly took on Greek characteristics when their cultural contacts widened. Nevertheless, there were numerous aspects of Roman religion which never took on any Hellenistic influence at all. And, of course, by the late Republic strange Egyptian religions and Oriental mystery cults had made their way to Rome, and these had even less to do with what we consider "Greek gods".

103 posted on 12/29/2003 3:53:32 PM PST by SedVictaCatoni (You keep nasty chips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni
Sorry abouot hte Domitian thing -- wasn't he Septimus Severus's son and one of his successors along with Titus?

What were the aspects of Roman religion that stayed true? I didn't know that, my impression was mostly that the Romans didn't care too much about the Gods.
104 posted on 12/30/2003 12:02:10 AM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni
When you talk about strange Oriental cults, you're not quite correct, no Oriental (viz. Chinese/Korean/Japanese) religions did move into Rome -- too far away. However, there were centres dedicated to ISIS of Egypt, Mazdaism (Zoroastrian group) and perhaps Buddhism (not too difficult to imagine, considering that most of Central Asia was Buddhist.
105 posted on 12/30/2003 12:04:29 AM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Sorry abouot hte Domitian thing -- wasn't he Septimus Severus's son and one of his successors along with Titus?

You're thinking of Vespasian, emperor from 69-79 AD. Septimus Severus wore the purple from 193-211 AD.

When you talk about strange Oriental cults, you're not quite correct, no Oriental (viz. Chinese/Korean/Japanese) religions did move into Rome -- too far away. However, there were centres dedicated to ISIS of Egypt, Mazdaism (Zoroastrian group) and perhaps Buddhism (not too difficult to imagine, considering that most of Central Asia was Buddhist.

"Oriental" in classical history refers essentially to everything east of the Aegean Sea. Oriental cults were those from Asia (modern western Turkey), Syria, Persia, Mesopotamia, Egypt, Cyprus, and such. Isis, Mithras, etc. are thus considered "Oriental" cults for this purpose.

I don't think that Buddhism ever made it to the Roman world, and the OCD doesn't make any reference to it. At least one of the very easternmost outposts of Hellenism adopted Buddhism, though, in the region of the Transoxiana. Statues of the Buddha clad in a toga still survive.

106 posted on 12/30/2003 8:31:49 PM PST by SedVictaCatoni (You keep nasty chips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni
True again, sheesh, my memories failing me! I normally can remember the Emperors up until Severus, after that it's too murky (well 200 AD was the start of the end for the WEstern R. E.). LEt's see if I get this right (don't look at me -- I'm not that strange, just a bad insomniac!) Augustus 27BC to 14 Ad, Tiberius 14 to 37, Gaius "Caligula" 37 to 41, Claudius 41 to 54, Nero 54 - 68, Galba, Otho, Vitellus in 69, Vespasian 69-79, Titus 79-81, Domitian 81-96, Nerva 96-98, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, MArcus Aurelius until 180, Commodus 180-193 (I hate the historical inaccuracies in Gladiator, don't you?), Pertinax, Didius Julius in 193, Septimus Severus, Caracalla...


Are you completely sure about the classical definition of 'Oriental'? Because then Judaism and Christianity would be Oriental as well. According to Romans, the lands of Phrygia and Lydia were Asia, to the south of which were phoenicia and Judaea and to the east of which was Parthia. Way to the east of that were the fabled lands of Cathay and Indium.

TRansoxiana -- in current day Afghanistan, correct? But that would have been during the time of Seleucus, around 300 to 200 BC.After that time it was PArthian. Buddhism did flourish along the old silk route right upto current day Turkmenistan.
107 posted on 12/31/2003 12:06:20 AM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Buddhism I always feel suffers from hype. I'm not saying that there are many admirable parts of that philosophy, I'm only saying that we in the West see only a syrupy shallow offering and most of the adherents here seem to just consider Buddhism (And other 'eastern' religions) as just chanting and wearing silly costumes. For instance, Lamaism, we just see the Dalai Lama as a smiling Buddha (yes, the fat one) -like figure but do most of the adherents realise that Lamaism has a very strict morality code not unlike Christianity? It considersgays and affairs immoral and urges discipline.
108 posted on 12/31/2003 12:11:07 AM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
The Buddhas in Chinese restaurants represent the kind of bliss I prefer (epicurean vs nirvana).
109 posted on 12/31/2003 1:08:33 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
That would be epicurean versus stoicism. Not too fond of Chinese stuff myself
110 posted on 12/31/2003 1:17:43 AM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Being silly. I don't believe in nirv-
111 posted on 12/31/2003 1:20:16 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Are you completely sure about the classical definition of 'Oriental'? Because then Judaism and Christianity would be Oriental as well.

"Oriental" was a concept which embraced the idea of the non-Greek east. So Orientalism is Pharoah, not Ptolemy; Zenobia, not Antiochus. Orientalism in government was despotism after the manner of, say, Mithridates, and mystical religion after the fashion of Sol Invictus. Orientalism is essentially what Marc Antony was accused of by Octavian - sybaritic luxury and mysticism, alien to the Roman nature.

I don't know that much about Roman attitudes towards the Jews, but I suspect that many Romans would have considered the Jewish religion to be just another weird Oriental cult. Christianity escapes this, of course, because it was from quite early on centered in the Greek world. And, by the time that Christianity was widespread, Roman bias against the Oriental world had essentially faded away (along with their original identity as a city-state).

According to Romans, the lands of Phrygia and Lydia were Asia

Well, specifically, Roman "Asia" was the former kingdom of Pergamum.

112 posted on 12/31/2003 5:48:30 AM PST by SedVictaCatoni (You keep nasty chips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

ping)))


113 posted on 08/15/2004 3:02:54 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
When Daniel and his brethren were in captivity in Persia, they had ample chance to teach their hosts about the Torah, and thus they knew about the Messiah.

Zoroastrian thoughts of the Messiah predate Judaic thoughts of the same
114 posted on 08/15/2004 3:05:03 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chookter
Furthermore, some speculate because of the extraordinary age of Zoroastrianism that Judaism is a heretic sect of it.

I would doubt that -- the earliest date given for Zoroastrianism is 1700 B.C, and by that time, the initial teachings of monotheistic Judaism were already in place. however, Judaism does seem to have been heavily influenced by them during the exile and subsequent centuries of rule by the Persians.
115 posted on 08/15/2004 3:07:57 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet; ladyinred
If it wasn't for their few supernatural beliefs buddhism would be more a philosophy than a religion.

Buddhism, in its pure form (Hinayana as practised by the Buddhists in Sri Lanka) is atheistic and is a philosophy as you point out. The simplified, garbled form of it (Mahayana as practised in all other countries) takes on various Hindu and Chinese gods and, heretically (according to the Hinayana buddhists) consider Gautama Buddha a God. Of course the Brahmin priests found a smart way to win back India (which was once nearly totally Buddhist, under the EMperor Asoka) to Hinduism by the simple process of making Buddha just another incarnation of the god vishnu
116 posted on 08/15/2004 3:12:49 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni
So it's not a question of gumption - it's a question of logistics. A lasting Roman conquest of Parthia would have been logistically and culturally extremely difficult. Alexander managed to race through and nominally seize the whole region, but what he left behind him was simply a new Persia with a change of dynasty, and which thought of itself as theoretically Greek in outlook. The Romans probably would have been able to do little better.

Logically and culturally difficult, true, but I wouldn't have put it past the Romans -- great dudes IMHO
117 posted on 08/15/2004 3:14:20 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: eastforker; ASA Vet; A. Pole; RussianConservative; Destro; blam
I would say that September 11th has other significances as well -- The Turks were at the gates of Vienna in the 17th century when Jan Sobieski IIIrd of Poland-Lithuania came and saved Christendom. What date was this? September 11th-12th.

I think OBL wanted to use the same date to avenge the defeat. On another note -- Christianity has a lot to thank the Poles for.
118 posted on 08/15/2004 3:17:04 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni
Nevertheless, there were numerous aspects of Roman religion which never took on any Hellenistic influence at all.

Are you talking aobut the Household genus?
119 posted on 08/15/2004 3:23:09 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Christianity has much to thank all peoples of Christ for...at some point all helped.

But what is more interesting is not Viena but what leads up to Viena and how other such events take place. Here is the hand of God...all know that the 2 historic worst winters of Europe were in Napoleons (an atheist) invasion and Hitler's invasions of Russia...if either had won, Christiandom on the long run would have suffered horrably.

Viena was another such event. It was not the Poles who saved Viena, the Poles simply finished off what is left of the Turks, who had already failed to take Viena for lack of heavy artillery and they lack camels to carry much supplies and many Janesaries down with fever...but why? The reason is this: the Turks gather giant army in SE Balkins, with many heavy cannons and lots of camels for supplies...but one month before they go begin unnatural, unseasonal rains...so much so that camels get rot, roads to muddy for heavy load of the cannons and many troops become sick...the Turks try regardless.

This once more shows how the Hand of God does not act in necessity directly as a slap to the face, but through other forces of nature herself...his creation...to beat down the enemy.

120 posted on 08/15/2004 3:13:42 PM PDT by RussianConservative (Xristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson