Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warrants: Limbaugh Was 'Doctor Shopping'
My Way.Com ^ | 12/4/03 | Jill Barton

Posted on 12/04/2003 2:44:23 PM PST by Lucky2

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) - Investigators raided the offices of Rush Limbaugh's doctor Thursday, saying in search warrants that the conservative radio commentator engaged in illegal drug use and "doctor shopping" for prescription painkillers.

The warrants show investigators were looking for records including prescription disbursements, appointment schedules, receipts and a medical questionnaire.

"Mr. Limbaugh's actions violate the letter, and spirit" of the law that relates to "doctor shopping," stated one of warrants, signed by Asim Brown, a law enforcement agent assigned to the state attorney's office anti-money laundering task force. Doctor shopping refers to looking for a doctor willing to prescribe drugs illegally.

Limbaugh denied any wrongdoing to listeners on his radio show earlier Thursday and accused prosecutors in Palm Beach County of going on a "fishing expedition."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asimbrown; barneyfife; clintonprosecutor; doper; drugaddict; expostfacto; fishingexpedition; junkie; liar; limbaugh; medicalrecords; palmbeachcounty; politicallymotivated; rush; rushlies; showtrial; wildgoosechase; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-284 next last
To: EverFree
Okay, you got me there! I surrender!
221 posted on 12/04/2003 7:15:35 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant
I don't believe the analogy of Chong v. Rush works.

I don't think so, either.

-PJ

222 posted on 12/04/2003 7:22:47 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton; skinkinthegrass
There was a guy on C-SPAN 2 a couple of weeks ago discussing a book he had edited that was based on a recently discovered diary of Robert Jackson. Jackson knew Roosevelt over a period of many years, well before Roosevelt's paralysis. The editor was saying the diary has items like: "Went fishing with Roosevelt. He said that maybe he should pack the court." The book is called "That Man". The talk on C-SPAN included a long and interesting review of Jackson's life. It might be online.
223 posted on 12/04/2003 7:23:19 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant
The analogy works as far as the perceived political element: Chong supports cry about Ashcroft's agenda and Rush's about PBC demonrats.

There is no analogy, other than what the specious laws Declare to be Truth, between empty glass tubes and addictive opiate narcotics. (Isn't it dumb that, for clarity, I must redundantly qualify narcotics as opiates?)

Chong was in no way an addict or narcotics trafficker, so the analogy fails at the medical level, but holds at the legal level.

224 posted on 12/04/2003 7:23:38 PM PST by EverFree (Gonzalez for Mayor of SF! Rip out the demonrats' San Francisco heart !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
A similar attitude manifests itself on plenty of these threads at FR too.
225 posted on 12/04/2003 7:26:06 PM PST by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Understood.
226 posted on 12/04/2003 7:35:54 PM PST by DaughterofEve (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Lucky2
Oh, isn't he a sweetie! LOL...Dr shopping?? OMG!
227 posted on 12/04/2003 7:37:18 PM PST by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EverFree
Thanks, I see your point. I personally believe the maid should not have received immunity (if true). What she did is reprehensible and if he is punished, so should she be.
228 posted on 12/04/2003 7:42:39 PM PST by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
What crime, pray tell...
229 posted on 12/04/2003 7:51:45 PM PST by el_texicano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deport
Whom ever reported this has violated the HIPPA regulations. Information about his drug use aside revealing that he has hypertension is a violation of his right to medical privacy.

In preparation for the implementation of HIPPA regs the hospital that I work for had to do intensive education to make sure that all medical staff was informed about compliance. I cannot legitimately tell a spouse about the other spouse's medical condition or any medication that they are taking.
230 posted on 12/04/2003 7:54:11 PM PST by TASMANIANRED
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant
This could have a happy ending for those who are committed to 'limited' govt.

The public lynching of a very popular conservative just might unite those who view drug abuse as an illness,(treatment vs. incarceration) with those who likewise view our micro-managed, craddle to grave, every facet of your life type of government meddling as being equally destructive of liberty and all that this country was founded upon. What's left of it, anyway.

This would, of course, leave the Looney Left in the less-than-desirable position of having to defend all of the government's intrusions, it's heavy-handed approach toward the dismantling of our constitutional protections via their 'living' document interpretations and the implementation of the socialist's ultimate meat-axe aka: the income tax.

The WOD and the Income Tax will guarantee a socialist victory sometime during the fourth quarter in our nation's history. Together, they'll be used to bludgeon us into the utopia (Hillary's dream) that awaits.

Fourth down and inches with the ball (Rush) on the 40 yd. line, my guess is that we'll punt.

231 posted on 12/04/2003 8:10:22 PM PST by budwiesest ("Mr. Franklin, that republic you spoke of, seems to have been misplaced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
I'm not familiar with HIPPA.... but I'd guess this info was disseminated by medical staff but rather it has come from the investigative group.... so do the same rules apply? How about in court?
232 posted on 12/04/2003 8:11:12 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano
Oh, no crime at all. Buying a month's supply of the same painkiller from four different drugstores because you told four different doctors that they were your only doctor isn't a crime, especially when Rush Limbaugh is accused of it.

The rules don't apply to the rich and famous, especially when they are people you admire.
233 posted on 12/04/2003 8:19:33 PM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: deport
The records seized in the raids list prescriptions for more than 2,100 pills from March 24 through Sept. 26. The medications include the powerful painkillers Oxycontin, Lorcet, Norco, hydrocodone and Kadian. In addition, Limbaugh received prescriptions for the anti-anxiety drug Xanax, the cholesterol-lowering drug Niacin, and Clonodine, which treats high blood pressure.

Wow. We know all this about a talk show host, but the press still has never been able to get ahold of Clinton's medical records.

234 posted on 12/04/2003 8:22:05 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
So much for "getting a second opinion!"
235 posted on 12/04/2003 8:25:36 PM PST by lonestar (Don't mess with Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
Actually what gives Rush the presumption of being "innocent" is our Constitution. Your last line in the post really sheds some light on your real problem with Rush and it is not a pretty picture.

" LOL, no but it sure as *ell makes him filthy stinkin rich with friends in high places!"

236 posted on 12/04/2003 8:38:36 PM PST by ImpBill ("America ... Where are you now?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: jrawk
Which is the greater evil/cost to society here?

Rush's biggest problem is speaking out against the ever-expanding state. To the statists, Rush is the great evil. Since Rush returned from his treatment, he has been fairly outspoken about the bad Medicare bill. Who benefits from the bill? Who loses?

237 posted on 12/04/2003 8:41:43 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: petitfour
Rush's biggest problem is speaking out against the ever-expanding state

The War on Drugs has been a major driving force behind the expansion of the state over the last 30 years, especially regarding the destruction of the 4th and 5th amendments

I never heard Rush speak out against that, in fact, he supported it

Maybe he feels differently now that the system he supported has caught him in its snare.

238 posted on 12/04/2003 8:52:44 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
You have hit the proverbial nail squarely and resoundingly on the head with regard to Rush and the pain management issue.
God bless you...I'm happy to hear that your gallbladder problem has been resolved. I can stand just about anything too, but I've experienced just enough of that kind of pain to know that it would be intolerable over any length of time without medication. I'm thankful to never have been put to that long term test. Perhaps that is one reason I find it unconscionable that otherwise healthy recreational users and addicts try to comparatively equate their selfish, health damaging pursuits to people with genuine health issues who inadvertently become addicted while trying to resolve them.

239 posted on 12/04/2003 10:21:22 PM PST by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
I never heard Rush say that oxycontin was the drug he was using, did you? I know that drug was mentioned in the NE story.
240 posted on 12/04/2003 10:40:29 PM PST by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-284 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson