Skip to comments.
Breaking: Val Verde fire intentionally Set!
Kcal Channel Nine
Posted on 10/27/2003 2:26:33 PM PST by Partisan Hack
According to ticker at the bottom of the screen. LA district attorney says that Val Verde fire was intentionally started.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: arson; fire; landgrab
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-162 next last
To: editor-surveyor
141
posted on
10/27/2003 6:04:03 PM PST
by
Cindy
To: JackRyanCIA
OK - I know what a watermelon is, politically speaking. You got me on the Asian Pears though - what is that?
142
posted on
10/27/2003 6:28:21 PM PST
by
Let's Roll
(And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
Comment #143 Removed by Moderator
To: LittleJoe; Pubbie
The Sierra Club and ELF consider forrest fires a part of the natural ecosystem. It's capitalist mankind that is evil and needs to be punished! If your goal is to make it impossible for development to happen near forest areas, what better way to do it than to set a sufficient number of fires that fire-insurance becomes impossible to get. No insurance coverage = no mortgage issuance = no developer can get funding
144
posted on
10/27/2003 6:38:56 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === (Finally employed again! Whoopie))
To: Cindy; Pubbie
No surprise here, you need to flag Pubbie, and explain it to him. :o)
145
posted on
10/27/2003 6:45:22 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
( . Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
To: Pubbie
They usually prefer attacking people or their possesions - but not against Nature since that is what they are allegedly trying to protect.
The biggest error of that thinking is that the bark beetle investation is destroying the forest....even if there never is a forest fire, the trees are dead, and more are dying in a expotential ratio. Where there were 1-2 dead trees 5 years ago, there is now an acre or more because of the prolific bark beetle.
Enviros got Clintoon and Babbitt to leave the dead trees alone. Loggers could salvage those trees if removed within 1 year--for lumber. After that, not any good. Clintoon and Babbitt refused, let the enviros have their way, and now we have the predictable results.
It gets even bettr---Gov Davis stood down ALL the Calif Dept of Forestry (CDF)attack airplanes which drop the borade. He said they needed winter maintenance. I don't know the total number of planes in the fleet, but if part of them are torn apart for maintenance and not able to fly, then IMO, someone should sue Davis for criminal neglect. Davis is a total jerk. He is literally leaving Calif with scorched earth.
The media either doesn't know about this or they are protecting Davis right to the end.
In the early summer, Davis shut down all the forestry fire watch towers. Said we couldn't afford them. Some of the retirees and employees are manning them here in N Cal for no pay, because they are necessary.
If Davis decides to stroll thru my acres, it will be very tempting to get out my weapons.......
To: ridesthemiles
Hmm...
Maybe you are right...
147
posted on
10/27/2003 7:54:18 PM PST
by
Pubbie
(Vote "No" On Recall, "Yes" On Bustamante)
To: John H K
Yes, the one started by the lost hunter is the largest, correct? Decided lack of interest in the start to that fire on FR. Incorrect societal group and all.There's an unidentified hunter who has been in the custody of the Sheriff's Department and the Department of Forestry for more than two days now, according to reports. He hasn't been charged (which makes one wonder how they've been able to keep him for so long).
If it makes you feel any better, they're hunting down two members of your preferred societal group -- white guys -- who may have started the Waterman fire. Hell, they're even in a van, in case you're feeling nostalgic for the DC (Muslim) Sniper killings.
To: LittleJoe
That's standard procedure.
The drivers force the illegals to jettison every bit of excess baggage before they get into whatever conveyance is taking them to Phoenix.
You get more paying customers into the vehicle that way.
It's another reason our next major cleanup is expected to be a 60-bagger for a mere half mile of arroyo.
149
posted on
10/27/2003 9:04:03 PM PST
by
HiJinx
(Go with courage, go with honor, go in God's good Grace. Come home when it's time. We'll be here.)
Comment #150 Removed by Moderator
To: editor-surveyor
BTTT!!!!!!!
151
posted on
10/28/2003 3:07:47 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: HiJinx
It's another reason our next major cleanup is expected to be a 60-bagger for a mere half mile of arroyo
It never occured to me that there are so many that people have to clean up after them!
To: alwaysconservative
I agree that it is likely ELF. To a group that destroys building projects and SUV dealerships to prove that mankind is harming the earth, deliberately setting fires to destroy the land for others and the property of others is not a big stretch. I tend to agree -- look at all of the developments that have been destroyed. ELF's reasoning would be that there are always fires in that area, and the stuff will grow back.
I'm half wondering whether the fires in Oregon this summer (started when Bush was visiting the area) were also the work of ELF -- they were only an hour's drive from Eugene, after all....
153
posted on
10/28/2003 12:12:36 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: LittleJoe
Oh my.
Yeah, the BP apprehends over 125,000 annually in this sector (Cochise County, AZ), an 80 mile stretch of US/Mexico border. That's 300+ apprehensions per day 24/7. And they only catch 10% or less of the crossers.
The illegals camp overnight at the very least while awaiting transport, and everything they brought over with them is dropped at the pick-up point.
We had a Public Lands Cleanup Day two years ago along a 10-mile stretch of the San Pedro River...9 tons of trash and garbage were collected.
The campgrounds are a collection of food containers, water bottles, soiled clothing, toilet paper, used tampons, human waste, backpacks...you name it, it is probably sitting here fouling up two of Arizona's prettier National Forests/Monuments.
Oh well, sorry for the rant...you just happened to touch a nerve! There're a lot of 'battle weary' residents down here.
154
posted on
10/28/2003 12:22:04 PM PST
by
HiJinx
(Go with courage, go with honor, go in God's good Grace. Come home when it's time. We'll be here.)
To: SauronOfMordor
If your goal is to make it impossible for development to happen near forest areas, what better way to do it than to set a sufficient number of fires that fire-insurance becomes impossible to get. No insurance coverage = no mortgage issuance = no developer can get funding
That's exactly the problem where I live. I have no fire insurance. Only a very few of my neighbors live close enough to a fire station on the highway to be able to afford the movie star rates for insurance.
I have no mortgage, but younger folks who would like to build can't. They can't afford the insurance, permits and bribes that have to be paid to live in the mountains.
We once had a thriving community of miners, loggers, ranchers and businesses that catered to people who came to the mountains to enjoy nature.
We have now become a ghost town. Prosperous happy families have been replaced with crankster gangsters from the city.
The beautiful forrest the Sierra Club claims to love has been turned into a dump.
All of this thanks to the Sierra Club and the corrupt politicians who accept money from that capitalist hating communist front!
To: HiJinx; Sabertooth
bump for #114
156
posted on
10/28/2003 12:24:37 PM PST
by
txhurl
To: HiJinx
Oh well, sorry for the rant...you just happened to touch a nerve! There're a lot of 'battle weary' residents down here
No need to be sorry. We're all under assault. I used to think that only us mountain people were getting the shaft. I can see where you guys are getting it just as bad as us, if not worse.
We need to take our country back!!!
To: LittleJoe
That's exactly the problem where I live. I have no fire insurance. Only a very few of my neighbors live close enough to a fire station on the highway to be able to afford the movie star rates for insurance. Thus only the ultra-wealthy can have homes in the hills, and have nice views uninterrupted by the homes of the peons (which is the real objective of many "environmentalists")
158
posted on
10/28/2003 1:24:04 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === (Finally employed again! Whoopie))
To: SauronOfMordor
Thus only the ultra-wealthy can have homes in the hills, and have nice views uninterrupted by the homes of the peons (which is the real objective of many "environmentalists")
That's exactly what's happening. The only new homes being built are in the million dollar plus category.
Working families have been given the boot so that wealthy enviro celebrities can have the great views for their own.
To: editor-surveyor
Interesting concept. I felt that same concept about a lot of things. Could it actually be someone(s) from the so called opposition? Usually to cause a lot of damage that costs a lot of money and sometimes lives.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-162 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson