Posted on 12/21/2014 2:51:56 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
With no love lost for Jeb Bush among the Republican base, the Iowa caucuses could be an early stumbling block in his 2016 quest.
The former Florida governor’s business-friendly stances and willingness to criticize GOP hard-liners make him popular with the donor class. But the first-in-the-nation state hasn’t been kind to establishment candidates in recent years.
And just after he announced this week he’s “actively exploring” a president bid, some Iowa activists are already torching Bush’s credentials. “He's on the wrong side of every issue that matters most to conservatives right now,” said Steve Deace, an influential Des Moines-based conservative radio host.
Deace ripped Bush for his support for immigration reform and Common Core education standards as apostates to the conservative cause before saying he’d “bet my mortgage” against Bush performing well in Iowa.
“He's not just for amnesty, he's an apostle for it. He's a pitchman for Common Core, and there's more organized conservative opposition to Common Core on the ground than anything besides ObamaCare,” he said. “He offers nothing, truly nothing. I don't know why any who's even a modicum of a conservative would vote for him.”
The Iowa GOP caucuses have punished establishment candidates in recent years.
The process is often dominated by the state’s large population of religious conservatives, and a pair of cash-poor candidates defeated better-organized and much better funded foes by tapping into voters’ frustration with the GOP elites the last two presidential races.
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) pulled off a come-from-behind win over former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) in 2008, while former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) edged Romney in 2012.
Iowa Republicans from across the party believe Bush may have a chance in the state if dedicates the time and energy to woo voters. But, they say he has a ton of work to do to convince Iowa conservatives that he’s one of them.
“His hurdles are going to be high,” said Bob Vander Plaats, an Iowa social conservative leader and former gubernatorial candidate.
Vander Plaats warned of “Bush fatigue” and said his immigration position “looks a lot like amnesty, not compassionate conservatism.”
The onetime Huckabee backer said Bush’s biggest problem was his education position.
“There are a lot of people that believe our schools have been hijacked by the federal government and they've lost local control. I just don't see anybody getting the nomination who advocates for Common Core,” said Vander Plaats.
It’s not impossible to win Iowa as the establishment favorite, even for those with some major policy disagreements with the base. Jeb’s brother George W. Bush proved that in 2000, and their father, George H.W. Bush, did before them when he defeated Ronald Reagan in Iowa in 1980.
Sen.-elect Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) pulled off a dominant primary win earlier this year by wooing both hardline conservatives and establishment figures. And Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad (R) successfully led a recapture of the state GOP from the control of religious and libertarian activists last year, intent on making sure Iowa’s caucuses would be an amenable place for Republicans of all stripes.
Some say Bush’s conservative record as governor gives him a platform, while others point out that he’ll likely have the money to build a top-notch organization — and can draw on a crop of GOP organizers who cut their teeth working for his brother.
“There's a large contingent [of voters] that could support Jeb Bush while everyone else tries to outflank each other on the right,” said Iowa GOP strategist Tim Albrecht, Branstad’s former spokesman. “It's important for him to highlight what he was able to do as governor and what the actual results are.”
Republican candidates also haven’t had to win Iowa to win the nomination in recent years — neither Romney nor John McCain did, though both placed strongly in the state.But it's rare for a candidate to compete and fail badly in Iowa and still win the nomination.
Iowa strategists say to succeed, candidates don’t have to shed their so-called “establishment” appeal — but they do have to prove that they’re still strong conservatives and earn voters’ trust by traveling the state heavily.
Ultimately, Bush will need to talk a lot more about his record as governor and figure out how to better finesse disagreements with the base if he wants to succeed.
“I see no reason why Gov. Jeb Bush won't be very competitive, just as his brother was in 1999 and 2000,” said Dee Stewart, who was the Republican Party’s executive director during those caucuses. “He has an impressive record, he's regarded by those he worked with and for whom he governed as a solid conservative.”
Bush’s brother had strong ties with the state’s large evangelical Christian population as well as with more business-focused Republicans. Ernst had the quiet backing of Branstad and many in the state’s GOP establishment, but was also a proven conservative activist who left almost no room to be outflanked on her right. Her rise came at the expense of more-moderate businessman Mark Jacobs, who collapsed in the primary despite spending millions.
“Any candidate that's perceived as being establishment has to get in the trenches with Iowa conservatives and prove they have the credentials to be their favorite in the caucuses,” said GOP Iowa state Sen. David Johnson, a veteran of Iowa campaigns and a 2012 backer of Texas Gov. Rick Perry.
It’s an open question whether Bush, who has regularly criticized conservatives in his party over the years, is ready to play nice and woo base voters. He’s continued to emphasize immigration and education, his two biggest problem areas, in recent interviews rather than focusing on his time as a conservative executive.
Also, his recent comments that GOP candidates should be willing to "lose the primary to win the general without violating your principles” indicate he’s happy to remain combative with the more conservative corners of his party.
Many in the state are skeptical whether Bush is ready for a crowded Republican field of candidates — including others competing for the “establishment” mantle, like New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and others who may be able to appeal to center-right voters.
And that includes some who view the Bush family fondly.
“It's not going to happen for Jeb Bush here,” said one Iowa Republican official who’d been involved in helping his brother win the 2000 caucuses. “I just don't see him campaigning here and succeeding.”
We don’t need a third Bush running for President.
He groin kicks 100% of the people he needs 100% of to have the tiniest chance to ever take the oath of office. Then he says, "It's time for me to run."
Is this a great country or what?
Jeb Bush: Hi, vote for me. I have the same positions as Hillary Clinton except I am younger then her.
Who?
Will not happen
The order should be based on the last national election and with current conservative representation, I agree. Why don’t we just let California and the northeast choose our candidate.
He’s not just for amnesty, he’s an apostle for it. He’s a pitchman for Common Core....
***
Accurate description of Jebbie.
Stay out da Bushes!
+1
Don’t know if he will stumble but he won’t get many votes.
Personally I think Jeb is better lookin too.
In a more perfect world, primaries would occur about every 2 weeks starting with the state that had the highest R POTUS voting percentage in the previous election, and working their way down.
Utah, Wyoming and Oklahoma would be the first states. Since Iowa and New Hampshire were Democrat states, they would be well down the list.
Bush doesn’t need Iowa and will probably not try very hard there. He would probably prefer one of the many conservatives to win in Iowa and another in New Hampshire. His tons of money will be spent tearing down the leaders while he doesn’t get very active himself. When the conservatives have been serially overwhelmed and washed out by the Bush money he will begin to run in earnest in the later primaries. He will then win because the conservative candidates have mostly been toppled by each other and the bush $$. He will then be the last man standing and the one without taint of Bush manufactured and paid for scandal. It as an often used strategy and it works. The only hope to beat it is for one conservative to run away with it in the first two and keep going while the rest of the conservatives drop out. But that takes the kind of money only Bush will have. Romney will not run because Bush is running. that is the essence of Next In Line.
Mitt already suggested that if Bush runs Mitt won’t. They don’t want to split up the Big Donor money.
Don’t you think there will be a 3-way big money RINO shootout with Jeb, Mitty, and NJFatboy?
No. Christie isn’t rally in the running. He may think he is but no. He may try to break into line but he will not have the continuing funds. He is not next in line. He doesn’t even know where the line is much less his place in it. Mitt has said he “may not” run if Jeb gets in. In the next-in-line society they don’t step on each others’ toes. The coin toss settles it.
Meanwhile the more conservative candidates will split up the conservative vote, and a RINO will get in by plurality.
Works every time.
Establishment Favorite Republican = Designated Loser
It’s a simple equation. I’m surprised more Freepers have not yet figured it out.
Bingo! We have a WINNER! If I were to find out the RATS were reading sites like FreeRepublic to see who we liked the least I'd not be surprised. Once the RATS know the RINO we most despise they drag them across the Republican nomination finishing line .
Bush money is not the reason he can win nomination.
It is dividing conservative voters among several candidates is how he wins. Very similar to Newt, Santorum, Cain, dividing the votes to alear the path for the lone RINO Mitt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.