Posted on 06/18/2026 11:10:37 AM PDT by Red Badger
When I showed up for Army basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey, back in those long-lost days of the Cold War, one of the first things I learned, along with my fellows, was that no matter what we ended up doing in the Army, we were riflemen first and foremost. That lesson wasn't lost on us; not with the emphasis placed on basic rifle marksmanship. A few years later, I ended up teaching basic rifle marksmanship to ROTC cadets, and that was the lesson I tried to instill in them, as well.
Back then, we were using the good old M-16A1 rifle, and it was, at the time, considered a pretty cutting-edge weapon. Now, though, the Army is moving to the M7 rifle, newer still, and those rifles are getting something else: A cutting-edge laser to go along with the Army's night-vision gear.
The U.S. Army ordered 8,936 DAGIR-V1 laser systems to support the M7 rifle’s fire-control program, and the company building them happens to be a family-owned business that got its start making night vision gear five decades ago. B.E. Meyers & Co., a Redmond, Washington manufacturer, announced it has been awarded a contract to deliver the systems in fiscal year 2027, awarded through the service’s Program Manager Soldier Lethality office under the DLA Tailored Logistics Support Program.
Here's how those things work:
Understanding what the DAGIR-V1 actually does requires understanding the basic problem soldiers face fighting at night, which has shaped infantry tactics since night vision goggles became standard issue decades ago. A soldier wearing night vision can see in the dark, but aiming a rifle precisely still requires some way to mark exactly where the weapon is pointed, since standard rifle sights are difficult or impossible to use through night vision optics.
The DAGIR-V1 solves that by combining an infrared illuminator, which floods a wide area with infrared light invisible to the naked eye but clearly visible through night vision, with both infrared and visible aiming lasers mounted directly on the weapon, letting a soldier point the laser dot at a target and fire with confidence that the rifle is aimed where the dot lands. The system uses what’s called VCSEL technology, short for vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser, a more advanced and precise alternative to older laser diode designs that B.E. Meyers says produces a sharper, more consistently shaped beam than older laser aiming devices, improving a soldier’s ability to identify targets and assess threats in low light or total darkness.
Watch:
VIDEO AT LINK..................
There's a serious "cool" factor to all this, obviously. But I always have the same old-soldier's question about all this: What happens when the tech fails? Technology is, yes, a great force multiplier; we've had a recent and compelling lesson in that in the recent fracas with Iran. But tech is limited, especially when it's mounted on an individual weapon like a rifle. Batteries, after all, don't last forever. But there's one thing that never will fail that soldier who is a rifleman first: Basic marksmanship skills. Proficiency with a weapon should always mean, above all things, proficiency with iron sights and a Mark I eyeball, even at night. These things will never fail due to a bad battery - or an electromagnetic pulse.
Every soldier is a rifleman first. I will admit to being a recent convert to some optical sights myself, as my eyes are aging; my favorite heavy-cover rifle, a Marlin 1895G in .45-70, now wears a red-dot optic in addition to the old ghost-ring rear and ramp front I installed years ago. But a young soldier should be able to engage and destroy the enemy without any fancy electronics; while things like this new laser are cool and no doubt useful, let's not let it replace good old basic marksmanship.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
The post was about the new 6.8x51 I believe, not Garand/M14 and original Stoner rifles.
Okay
I took it that AKs were more accurate...
Soviets needed a rifle so simplistic yet sturdy that the most inbred Yak herder out of Mongolia could use it. Accuracy was a secondary consideration.
The AKs and variants are still the most prevalent rifles on Earth.
Big time.
.
Yup
.
Built Cheap and Loose
If it Breaks toss It
Then Grab another.
Accuracy is not an issue.
M1 is just barely above on old Enfield. Really heavy, but accurate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.