Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 06/16/2026 8:29:39 AM PDT by OrangeHoof
The COVID-19 vaccine lowered the risk of cardiovascular issues associated with the virus by around 40 percent, according to new research.
The study, which was published in JAMA Internal Medicine on Monday, studied the incidence of medical events like strokes and heart attacks in veterans immunized for COVID-19.
The study found that the vaccine decreased the risk of cardiovascular death associated with the virus by nearly 60 percent, the risk of heart attack by around 40 percent and the risk of stroke by just over 30 percent. Additionally, it decreased the risk of hospitalization for heart failure by around 40 percent, according to the study.
The researchers found that people over the age of 75 with the greatest reduction in risk for these health issues, as well as those with pre-existing health conditions. Other research supports these new findings.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Somewhere there is truth but it is just about impossible to find.
And where’s the evidence the virus even causes heart issues in the first place?
Yeh, sure! 😆
i just heard my dad yell " My dying ass".. he died in 2020 and is buried 1300 miles from me.. I still heard him loud and clear!
” JAMA Internal Medicine”
Whatever the H. that is. it needs to be relegated to ash heap of history. Defunded, delisted, and even removed from the history books. I hate Bull crap institutions posing as something legitimate. And as Always The communist hill is always there to help promote lies.
It was so ‘safe and effective’ that Albert Bourla, Stephen Bancel and Congress, ALL exempted themselves from having this wonderful protection flowing through their veins and bumping into their cancer killer T8 cells along with SV40 oozing out of their pores.
Must be Pfizer earnings “booster” season.
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/study-disturbing-dementia-pattern
"The single largest vaccine–dementia study ever conducted (n=13.3 million) finds risk intensifies with more doses"
"The single largest and most rigorous study ever conducted on vaccines and dementia — spanning 13.3 million UK adults — has uncovered a deeply troubling pattern: those who received common adult vaccines faced a significantly higher risk of both dementia and Alzheimer’s disease."
"'The risk intensifies with more doses, remains elevated for a full decade, and is strongest after influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. With each layer of statistical adjustment, the signal doesn’t fade — it becomes sharper, more consistent, and increasingly difficult to explain away."
******************************************************
Nothingburger.
It will require a generation gone by before people will blindly trust their Doctors again.
MMusson wrote: “I would like to see the data. MDs are not good at data analysis. Saw one study claiming the RNA vaccine was safe for pregnant mothers. The data actually showed a 78% loss of pregnancy.”
I too would like to see your data that shows a 78% loss of pregnancy.
You kill off all of the people who have multiple risk factors and all of the sudden the remaining population has less heart attacks. This is what they are doing in Canada, kill the sick people.. then everyone is healthier. :)
T.B. Yoits wrote: “No one was immunized for COVID-1984, regardless of what the CDC and their pfascist cohorts changed their definition to. O M M O I R C O R N O I N C proved that.”
By your logic, there are no vaccines since any/all vaccines do have breakthrough infections, ie, no vaccines produce immunity, therefore there are no vaccines.
It's not my logic. It's how vaccines work.
And yes, they do provide immunity, unlike the MurdeRNA Jim Jones Jab.
Playing "Russian Roulette" on a daily basis is also guaranteed to lower your risk of dying of Alzheimer's!
Regards,
On the basis of the sample sizes, and assuming that the injected and placebo groups have the same true mortality rate, a mortality difference of up to about ±36% would still fall within one standard deviation of the expected difference (corresponding to roughly a 68% confidence level).
The observed 24% higher mortality corresponds to a difference that is only 0.65 SD away from zero; this corresponds to a confidence level of about 49%.
In other words: It is just as likely as not that the observed difference in mortality is due to random noise.
In brief: A 50-50 chance that an observed difference is statistically significant is not considered sufficient grounds in the scientific community to conclude that the effect is "real."
Regards,
Also known as "Survivorship Bias."
Regards,
T.B. Yoits wrote: “It’s not my logic. It’s how vaccines work. And yes, they do provide immunity, unlike the MurdeRNA Jim Jones Jab.”
Then you don’t understand how vaccines work. Name three vaccines that produce immunity, ie, 100% effective, no one gets the disease after after receiving the shot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.