Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Nuclear Missile That Vladimir Putin Just Tested Could Destroy an Area the Size of the State of Texas
America First Report ^ | May 14, 2026 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 05/14/2026 12:18:28 AM PDT by Red Badger

The Russians have developed the most sophisticated nuclear missile in the history of the world by a very wide margin, and it is specifically designed to be used in a future nuclear war with the United States. The RS-28 Sarmat is an intercontinental ballistic missile that has a maximum speed of approximately 15,500 miles per hour. It is 116 feet tall, and that makes it roughly as tall as a ten story building. It can carry up to 10 metric tons of thermonuclear warheads, and those warheads can destroy an area the size of the state of Texas.

We have no defenses against the Sarmat, and so once it is launched we will get hit. It is an incredibly terrifying weapon, and many believe that it is only a matter of time before it actually gets used.

The Sarmat is the crown jewel of Vladimir Putin’s very long campaign to modernize Russia’s strategic nuclear arsenal…

Since coming to power in 2000, Putin has overseen efforts to upgrade the Soviet-built components of the Russian nuclear triad — deploying hundreds of new, land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles, commissioning new nuclear submarines and modernizing nuclear-capable bombers.

The United States doesn’t have anything like the Sarmat.

Neither does anyone else.

It has a maximum range of more than 21,000 miles, and it can carry up to 16 independently targetable nuclear warheads…

The Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile has an expected range over 10,000 kilometers (6,200 miles) and can reportedly carry up to 16 independently targeted nuclear warheads, according to the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, a US-based nonprofit. Putin claims the range extends to more than 35,000 kilometers (21,750 miles).

Let me try to put this into language that anyone can understand.

This missile has enough range to reach any target on the entire planet.

So there is nowhere that is out of reach.

A single Sarmat can release 16 independently-targetable nuclear warheads.

That means that one missile goes up, and 16 warheads come down.

And each one of those warheads can instantly destroy an entire major city.

Russia plans to eventually produce more than 40 of these ICBMs.

According to Newsweek, a single Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile can carry enough nuclear warheads to wipe out “an area the size of Texas”…

The RS-28 Sarmat will reportedly carry a nuclear payload large enough to wipe out an area the size of Texas or France.

The Sarmat is the most advanced intercontinental ballistic missile in the entire world by a wide margin, and we have no way to defend against them.

In fact, a study that was conducted by a team of 13 physicists and engineers with the American Physical Society determined that our anti-missile defenses are so feeble that we couldn’t even do much “to stop a relative handful of old-fashioned North Korean ICBMs” from reaching their targets.

But just in case we are able to improve them in the future, the Russians have equipped the Sarmat with “a host of capabilities intended to defeat ballistic missile defenses”…

The Sarmat is a silo-launched, liquid-fueled, nuclear-armed ICBM. The missile will reportedly have a host of capabilities intended to defeat ballistic missile defenses, ranging from decoys and other countermeasures to a fractional orbital bombardment capability, and independent post-boost vehicles (IPBV). There have even been suggestions that it could carry a payload of multiple hypersonic boost-glide vehicles.

If Vladimir Putin decides to push the button, we are toast.

Of course most people in the western world assume that Putin would never do that because our retaliatory strikes would destroy the Russians.

But the truth is that so much has changed over the past couple of decades.

The Russians now have the most sophisticated anti-missile systems in the world by a very wide margin, and we are still relying on extremely outdated Minuteman ICBMs that first went into service in the 1960s and 1970s.

If we launched our extremely outdated ICBMs at the Russians, are you sure that they would get through?

The balance of power has shifted dramatically, and most people in the western world have no idea.

Earlier this week, the Russians conducted a test launch of the Sarmat that Putin called an “unconditional success”…

The test-launch from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in the Arkhangelsk region took place at 11:15 a.m. Moscow time today, according to the Kremlin. Around half an hour later, Russian officials said that the missile hit its target at the Kura test range on the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia’s Far East.

The commander of the Strategic Rocket Forces, Sergei Karakayev, informed Putin of the successful test. The Russian leader monitored the launch via video link from his office bunker.

Putin called the test a “major event and unconditional success.”

This should have received a lot more attention from the media in the western world, because it is a huge story.

According to Putin, Sarmat missiles will start entering combat service by the end of this calendar year…

Putin said that the nuclear-armed Sarmat missile would enter combat service at the end of the year. It was built to replace the aging Soviet-built Voyevoda.

“This is the most powerful missile in the world,” Putin declared, adding that the combined power of the Sarmat’s individually targeted warheads is more than four times higher than that of any Western counterpart.

In contrast, the next-generation U.S. intercontinental ballistic missile, the LGM-35 Sentinel, is scheduled to enter combat service in the early 2030s.

In other words, we are way behind.

The Russians are also in the “final stages” of development for two other exceedingly fearsome weapons…

Putin also announced Russia was in the “final stages” of the development of the nuclear-armed Poseidon underwater drone and the Burevestnik cruise missile powered by miniature atomic reactors.

The Poseidon is designed to explode near enemy coastlines and cause a radioactive tsunami. The Burevestnik has virtually unlimited range thanks to nuclear propulsion, allowing it to loiter for days, circling air defenses and attacking from an unexpected direction.

In the future, a Poseidon drone armed with a nuclear weapon could be lurking just off the east coast and we would never even know it.

Once it explodes, a gigantic wall of radioactive water could come sweeping over Washington D.C. or New York City in just moments.

The Russians have been feverishly preparing for the wars of the future.

Meanwhile, our leaders have been focused on other things.

So let’s hope that a shooting war between the United States and Russia does not erupt any time soon, because it would not go very well for us.


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: americalastreport; burevestnik; fearporn; itistolaugh; lgm35sentinel; michaelsnyder; ntsa; ohwowanyway; panicporn; poseidon; putinthewarpig; sarmat; wonderweapon

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

1 posted on 05/14/2026 12:18:29 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-28_Sarmat


2 posted on 05/14/2026 12:18:49 AM PDT by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I wonder how many independently targeted warheads it has?


3 posted on 05/14/2026 12:26:12 AM PDT by griffin (When you have to shoot, SHOOT; don't talk. -Tuco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griffin

The article says 16 warheads. Looked up our “boomer” subs. 20 missles with 80 to 160 warheads depending on how it is configured. Can carry 5 more missiles but is limited by treaty.


4 posted on 05/14/2026 12:49:23 AM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant - Never Fearful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

It would likely hit Moscow if they ever fired it.


5 posted on 05/14/2026 12:53:57 AM PDT by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Russia is not suicidal and builds these weapons for the MAD policy that has kept direct conflict at bay.

Iran is run by suicidal homicidal maniacs who will make weapons like this to bring about their little CHUD imam from the well.


6 posted on 05/14/2026 12:55:44 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The report is nonsensical. Foremost, it has liquid propellant. Outdated as a delivery system. Second, the report fails to mention the sub launch nukes that the USA would use in retaliation in case Putin opts to use his nukes.

So the status is still MAD.


7 posted on 05/14/2026 12:58:29 AM PDT by Psycho_Runner (I voted for the presumed Felon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Most nukes are limited to 20 megatons. Anything more just expands mostly into space.


8 posted on 05/14/2026 1:16:52 AM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DHerion
True.


9 posted on 05/14/2026 2:14:55 AM PDT by Apparatchik (Русские свиньи, идите домой)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Russian hardware is pretty terrible. This is not because Russian techs can’t hack it, but because they simply lack the budgets to really stress test their systems. There’s no getting around having to test to destruction. That’s expensive, since each prototype is essentially hand-built. So they test only to the limits of puny R&D budgets, move to mass production on the basis of products that have not met many of their design objectives.

There’s a lot of talk about corruption, but much of it is like asking someone to build a Lamborghini for the price of a Fiat. It can’t be done. Some corruption could simply be people throwing up their hands and thinking since this is gonna fail anyway, might as well make a few bucks off the fiasco.


10 posted on 05/14/2026 2:36:02 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

“Quantity has a quality all its own.”
― Joseph Stalin


11 posted on 05/14/2026 2:51:33 AM PDT by Semper Vigilantis (What's the difference between a Libertarian and a Liberal? The spelling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Semper Vigilantis

[“Quantity has a quality all its own.”
― Joseph Stalin]


That’s true for artillery rounds, but not for SAM systems that cost half as much but can’t see the enemy. Russia has the worst of both worlds because of its small economy (6% of the US). The order book is puny, so its aircraft cost about the same, being unable to defray high fixed costs over many units. But the capabilities are substandard because the testing and production budget was inadequate.


12 posted on 05/14/2026 3:00:53 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Semper Vigilantis

[“Quantity has a quality all its own.”
― Joseph Stalin]


A huge chunk of the quantity was perhaps US Lend Lease. Unfortunately, the peek behind the curtain during the brief period when Soviet archives were open suggest a much smaller economy and a much bigger defense budget as a % of that economy than anyone expected. In addition to the non-market economy, the crushing levels of military spending, maybe 1/3 of GDP, brought the Soviet economy to its knees.

The Russian economy was the majority of the Soviet economy. Yet Russia is only 6% of the US economy despite being a market economy. The Russian economy in the Soviet era must have been even a smaller % of the US economy.


13 posted on 05/14/2026 3:08:29 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

https://tacticsinstitute.com/analysis/russias-sarmat-missile-test-triumph-or-strategic-mirage/


14 posted on 05/14/2026 3:19:05 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
It has a maximum range of more than 21,000 miles, and it can carry up to 16 independently targetable nuclear warheads…

Ballistics, dear boy, ballistics. Don't they teach that in journalism school anymore? The furthest distance between any two points on earth is 12,450 miles. More than that and you are taking the long way. Of course they could fire it to the south and approach from south pole to catch us by surprise, a partial orbital trajectory.

Or just leave it in orbit until they are ready. By that standard, any satellite has essentially unlimit trajectory.

15 posted on 05/14/2026 3:36:12 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ( Thorough planning and careful preparation is no substitute for wishful thinking. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

>their little CHUD imam from the well.

That’s a good one, boils it down nicely.


16 posted on 05/14/2026 3:47:16 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

We had MIRV missiles in the 70’s. And re-entry speed is kind of irrelevant.

And really, do we need enough to blow up the world more than we already have?

But it has been a week or so since Russia threatened nuclear war…so there is that.


17 posted on 05/14/2026 3:47:37 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
I disagree. I spent the late 80s-early 90s as an arms control inspector in the Soviet Union and got to see their strategic stuff close up. It worked just fine.

Part of the INF Treaty allowed us to pick 67 SS-20s from their stockpile at random and they were fired (minus warheads) full range. All of them launched perfectly and flew the full distance.

The Pershing IIs they picked failed to launch about 30% of the time.

It's always a bad idea to assume an enemy makes shoddy stuff.

18 posted on 05/14/2026 3:48:33 AM PDT by Chainmail (You can vote your way into Socialism - but you will have to shoot your way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Apparatchik

Wow kudos to the camera man that tracked that doomed missle.


19 posted on 05/14/2026 3:51:43 AM PDT by TalBlack (Their god is government. Prepare for a religious war.https://freerepublic.com/perl/post?id=4322961%2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“...The United States doesn’t have anything like the Sarmat...”

This sounds like a quote from General “Buck” Turgidson in Dr. Strangelove film. We cannot allow a Sarmat missile gap. Ha Ha.

But it really doesn’t matter if Russia has a new destructive weapon. The USA is more than capable of wiping out Russia just as easily. I wonder if Michael Snyder is working for the military industrial complex?


20 posted on 05/14/2026 3:51:45 AM PDT by Flavious_Maximus (Tony Fauci will be put on death row and die of COVID!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson