Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Bladder Cancer Device Clears Tumors In Most Patients, No Surgery Needed
Study Finds ^ | August 14, 2025 | Dr. Sia Daneshmand (University of Southern California Norris Cancer Center)

Posted on 08/14/2025 1:15:38 PM PDT by Red Badger

In A Nutshell

A new bladder cancer device called TAR-200 delivers chemotherapy directly into the bladder over time, avoiding long treatment sessions.

In a clinical trial, over 8 in 10 patients with a specific type of bladder cancer (carcinoma in situ) saw their cancer disappear after treatment.

Many patients stayed cancer-free for more than a year, and most were able to avoid bladder removal surgery during the study period.

Side effects were mostly mild urinary symptoms that cleared up within weeks, with serious problems being uncommon.

=================================================================

LOS ANGELES — For bladder cancer patients whose tumors stop responding to standard treatment, the choice has often been daunting: undergo radical surgery to remove the entire bladder, or pursue alternative treatments that may not be as effective. Results from a clinical trial suggest a promising third option may be emerging, at least for some patients.

Researchers announced that an experimental treatment called TAR-200 helped 82.4% of patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS), an aggressive form of bladder cancer, become cancer-free without requiring bladder removal surgery. The results, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, represent the highest single-agent complete response rate reported to date for this patient group.

The study focused on patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), a form of the disease where tumors no longer respond to BCG therapy, the current standard treatment that uses weakened tuberculosis bacteria to boost the immune system against cancer cells. While radical cystectomy remains the current standard of care for these patients, many are unable or unwilling to undergo the procedure. Other FDA-approved bladder-sparing treatments exist, but their response rates have historically been lower than the TAR-200 results seen in this study.

How TAR-200 Bladder Cancer Treatment Works

Other intravesical bladder cancer treatments typically require patients to retain the medication in their bladder for one to two hours after instillation. TAR-200 takes a different approach: it’s a first-in-class intravesical drug-releasing system designed to provide sustained delivery of the chemotherapy drug gemcitabine directly into the bladder over time.

The device is inserted during a brief office procedure. Once placed, it provides continuous local drug delivery and is replaced on a scheduled basis (every three weeks for the first six months, then every 12 weeks for up to two years).

Dr. Sia Daneshmand from the University of Southern California Norris Cancer Center and his colleagues tested TAR-200 in 85 patients with CIS whose bladder cancer had stopped responding to BCG treatment.

TAR-200 is a miniature, pretzel-shaped drug-device duo containing a chemotherapy drug, gemcitabine, which is inserted into the bladder through a catheter and releases the drug for three weeks per treatment cycle.

TAR-200 is a miniature, pretzel-shaped drug-device duo containing a chemotherapy drug, gemcitabine, which is inserted into the bladder through a catheter and releases the drug for three weeks per treatment cycle. (Photo courtesy of Johnson & Johnson)

============================================================================

82% Complete Response in CIS Cohort

Among the 85 patients who received TAR-200 alone, 70 patients (or 82.4%) achieved complete remission, meaning no signs of cancer could be detected during follow-up examinations. Most patients saw their cancer disappear within about three months of starting treatment.

According to the researchers, TAR-200 monotherapy achieved the highest single-agent response rate reported to date in this setting, with rapid onset and sustained effectiveness.

The responses proved durable. The median time patients remained cancer-free was 25.8 months, with 53% of responding patients staying disease-free for at least a year. After two years, roughly three-quarters of patients had avoided bladder removal surgery entirely. Because the median follow-up for this group was 20.2 months, not all patients had reached two full years.

The treatment also showed promise for patients with high-risk papillary bladder tumors. In a separate group of 52 patients with this form of cancer, 70.2% remained disease-free at the one-year mark.

By comparison, current FDA-approved treatments for BCG-unresponsive bladder cancer typically achieve complete responses in about 41–62% of patients. However, the researchers also noted that a recent study of another investigational agent showed a 75% complete response rate — closer to the TAR-200 results.

Side Effects Remain Manageable

TAR-200 showed a favorable safety profile that could make it accessible to patients who might not tolerate more aggressive treatments. The most common side effects were mild urinary symptoms (frequent urination, burning during urination, and urgency) that typically resolved within three weeks.

Only 12.9% of patients experienced severe side effects, and just 3.5% stopped treatment due to adverse reactions. No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study period. Adverse event rates were higher in other trial cohorts. For example, in the combination therapy group, 26.4% discontinued TAR-200 and 24.5% discontinued cetrelimab because of treatment-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred in any group.

What This Means for Patients

The importance of these results becomes clear when considering the limited options currently available. Radical cystectomy, while potentially curative, carries substantial risks. The procedure has a 90-day mortality risk of around 5% for all patients, rising to about 15% in elderly patients.

Real-world data suggests that fewer than 20% of patients with this type of bladder cancer actually undergo the recommended surgery, often due to age, other health conditions, or personal preference. Many patients are left with few alternatives.

The research does have important limitations. As a single-arm study without a control group, the results cannot be directly compared to other treatments through randomized trials. The median follow-up for responders in the CIS monotherapy group was 20.2 months. The study population was primarily older, White males, which may limit how broadly the results apply to other patient groups. Cost-effectiveness was not evaluated.

Despite these limitations, TAR-200 is being tested in additional clinical trials, including studies comparing it directly to other treatments and examining its use in combination with immunotherapy drugs.

For eligible patients who have exhausted standard treatment options, TAR-200 offers the possibility of keeping their bladder while effectively treating their cancer, potentially transforming quality of life for many diagnosed with this aggressive disease. Innovations like TAR-200 point toward a future of more personalized, less invasive treatment approaches.

Disclaimer: This article is based on the results reflect a phase IIb, noncomparative clinical trial and should not be interpreted as definitive proof of TAR-200’s effectiveness compared to other treatments. Response rates, survival estimates, and cystectomy-free rates are specific to the study’s patient populations and time frames; ongoing randomized controlled trials will be needed to confirm these results. Patients should consult their healthcare providers to discuss individual treatment options.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Military/Veterans; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: bladder; cancer; treatment

1 posted on 08/14/2025 1:15:38 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Bkmk


2 posted on 08/14/2025 1:21:57 PM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Is that similar to a TACE (chemo-embolization)?


3 posted on 08/14/2025 1:46:23 PM PDT by silent majority rising (When it is dark enough, men see the stars. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Great news if this actually works. Bladder cancer is a real killer.


4 posted on 08/14/2025 1:53:08 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1789. Death Certificate - 2021? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I guess Coach Neon Dion had a different type bladder cancer, or couldn’t get into the study. His bladder was removed in I believe in May.


5 posted on 08/14/2025 2:29:09 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silent majority rising

No idea.................


6 posted on 08/15/2025 5:35:56 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson