Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/11/2025 3:59:20 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Libloather

So it’s another Osprey


2 posted on 05/11/2025 4:03:02 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

GI Joe had X Wing.

A decent commercial.

https://youtu.be/hoWH-zF60EU?si=wmrIOTM2jeyZLzOS


6 posted on 05/11/2025 4:07:32 PM PDT by wally_bert (I cannot be sure for certain, but in my personal opinion I am certain that I am not sure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

So we are on the hook for another Osprey. Got it.

What requirements will this platform do that the Osprey can’t? Not crash and burn?


7 posted on 05/11/2025 4:07:57 PM PDT by Salvavida (NS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
"...take off and land like a helicopter..."

Not hardly.

Cannot come in hot for quick pick-up or fast-rope.
They have to transition from fwd flight over the LZ - nothing says "hit me" like a loiter over a hot LZ.

That's why the Army intends to fly Black Hawks for another 30+ years.

8 posted on 05/11/2025 4:08:46 PM PDT by Psalm 73 ("You'll never hear surf music again" - J. Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

I can’t wait for the first report that some young Warrant Officer took one out and barrel-rolled it.

You know someone is going to try.


9 posted on 05/11/2025 4:09:31 PM PDT by Dustoff45 (How to rank a political candidate, learn their position on Jesus, the unborn child and Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Meet “FLRAA,”

That’s not a name. Should be focusing on drones anyways.


12 posted on 05/11/2025 4:13:53 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Release the dragons.
13 posted on 05/11/2025 4:14:19 PM PDT by BipolarBob (AA told me to quit hanging around drunks. So I quit going to AA, cuz that's where they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
This might be a stupid question.

If the Army and Navy have their own aircraft, why do we need a separate Air Force? Why not put all our aircraft under Army and Navy control, as in WW2?

16 posted on 05/11/2025 4:18:53 PM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Looks like another Osprey. Someone at the Pentagon must be in love with that design.


20 posted on 05/11/2025 4:25:50 PM PDT by ComputerGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“And by the way, Chinese President Xi Jinping has nothing like it.”

Unfortunately, China’s R&D program = stealing what we develop. Then they try to mass-produce it at much lower cost.

The saving grace is that an aircraft like the one depicted would require A+ quality metallurgy, synthetic materials, and quality control. To date mainland China seems incapable of that.


30 posted on 05/11/2025 4:44:51 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

I can only imagine the ‘requirements” food fight that will ensue between the USMC & Special Ops folks.
Any dreams of fielding such an aircraft by the ‘early 2030’s” is a pipe dream. The V-22 took 20+ years to design, test, build and field...and it’s still the most incident prone aircraft in the DoD fleet.


36 posted on 05/11/2025 4:51:27 PM PDT by O6ret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Looks like a big chunk of fairing is gone...


37 posted on 05/11/2025 4:51:30 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Diversity is our Strength” just doesn’t carry the same message as “Death from Above”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
I don't see it replacing one of these.


40 posted on 05/11/2025 5:00:00 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

It bears mention that except for the F-35 and a few small flight training platforms, all of the US Navy’s aircraft are multi-engine. And they still lose an airframe on average about once every two years because of a double-engine failure, usually due to fuel contamination.

So in time these things are going to start killing people because they failed to engineer in the ability to perform a safe landing in the event of all engines inop.


52 posted on 05/11/2025 5:56:11 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Another corrupt uniparty political grift boondoggle, as assinine as the Osprey; which kills everyone in the event of engine failure.


58 posted on 05/11/2025 6:26:47 PM PDT by A strike (ICE ICE baby !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

What about an a10 like plane with vectored thrust jet engine. Could float like a butterfly, take off like a banshee...I’ve seen a jump jet do that...why not the a10....could be remote controlled...


67 posted on 05/11/2025 7:26:01 PM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and harder to find. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Tilt!


77 posted on 05/11/2025 9:22:18 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 (Don't shoot until you see the whites of their lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

You need to know nothing about helicopters to see that the Defiant X was the clear winner to replace the Blackhawk, in size and performance and sustaining costs. This is another total debacle waiting to happen. Way too sophisticated and expensive for what was needed.


78 posted on 05/11/2025 9:35:11 PM PDT by pghbjugop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Tilt rotors....

“10,000 parts rotating around an like leak.”


79 posted on 05/11/2025 11:34:29 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's ey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Some ideas are smart and some are clever. Regardless of it's technical features, I put this in the "clever" category - it takes intelligent people to produce, but the true intent may be entirely different than the stated intent.

If I'm a soldier on the ground in need of support, I would want either an A-10 or "Puff the Magic Dragon". And for high speed troop deployment ... that's what parachutes are for.

81 posted on 05/11/2025 11:49:13 PM PDT by The Duke (Not without incident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson