Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BYD's 5-Minute EV Fast Charging: We Tried It. It's A Game-Changer
Inside EVs ^ | May 07, 2025 | Staff

Posted on 05/11/2025 8:12:19 AM PDT by Red Badger

Ask someone who drives a gasoline-powered car why they wouldn't want to get an electric one, and you're almost certain to hear this answer: they take way too long to charge.

They're not even entirely wrong. Even though DC fast charging times are getting shorter and shorter for modern electric vehicles, they can seem totally unacceptable for anyone who's used to fueling a gas-powered car in a matter of minutes—and that still describes most people in this country.

To counter this, the Chinese carmaking giant BYD, which recently surpassed Tesla in EV sales, came up with an idea so ambitious that it almost sounds impossible. Engineers sought to cut EV fast-charging down to five minutes—roughly what it takes to fill up a gas-powered car.

When BYD announced that it had actually pulled this off with some of its latest EVs, the development made headlines all over the world. It's called Megawatt charging because it delivers 1,000 kilowatts of electrical power at 1,000 volts, which is twice as powerful as the fastest chargers we have here in the United States. And BYD claims its new electric sedan, the Han L, can gain almost 250 miles (400 kilometers) of range in just five minutes with this setup.

I almost didn't believe it. So while I was in China for the Shanghai Auto Show, I knew I had to see it for myself. And after a flight to Beijing for a technical briefing and demonstration, to which InsideEVs was the sole Western outlet invited, I can confirm that five-minute fast-charging is very real.

Will BYD's charging breakthrough be on every street corner in a few years, the way gas stations are right now? Not exactly. But BYD has shown the rest of the world what can be done with EV charging. And it's nothing less than a game-changer for the entire space.

BYD's Megawatt Charging: What It Is And How It Works It's important to understand that BYD's breakthrough isn't just a car, or a battery, or the charger itself. It's all three, and how they work in concert with each other.

It all starts with BYD's new Super e-Platform. The automaker claims it's the world's first mass-produced vehicle platform on a 1,000-volt electrical architecture—higher than the best EVs we have that run on 800 volts, or even the new 926-volt Lucid Gravity. That ultra-high level of voltage, which BYD calls a "kilovolt architecture," is what makes these charging speeds possible.

That was no easy task, BYD engineers said. The components to get that done simply didn't exist, and so BYD had to make them.

That involved self-developed 1,500-volt silicon-carbide power chips, redesigned electric motors and motor controllers, revamped power distribution components and even a reworked heating and air conditioning system. "From the vehicle’s perspective, a kilovolt architecture means multiple parts need to be designed to handle kilovolt-level power," a BYD representative told InsideEVs.

They said it was an exercise in solving "multi-physics challenges"—electrical, magnetic, mechanical and thermal—across the entire vehicle from top to bottom to accommodate such unprecedented levels of power.

But like most Chinese automakers, and Tesla, BYD was able to get this done in-house rather than relying on outside suppliers the way Western car companies do. "The kilovolt architecture represents a comprehensive upgrade of BYD’s EV design system," the automaker said in a technical briefing. "With BYD’s vertical industrial layout, a complete kilovolt manufacturing chain has been established independently."

That electrical architecture has yielded incredible performance in other areas. The two cars that use the Super e-Platform, the Han L sedan and Tang L SUV, can both do zero to 60 mph in 2.7 seconds. (After driving the former around Beijing for a bit, I can tell you I believe those claims.) And BYD said it did those launches up to 70 times continuously without any performance degradation, to give you an idea of how robust it is. (By the way, neither car is very expensive; Han L sedan starts at 209,800 yuan, or around $29,000. The Tang L starts at 229,800 yuan ($31,000) and stretches to 289,800 yuan ($40,000).

None of this would be possible without a battery that's up for the job. But BYD's Flash Charging Battery was born to do it. The Han L gets an 83.2 kWh battery pack, while the Tang L steps up to 100 kWh. A derivative of BYD's "Blade" battery, these are lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) units, a chemistry that China has essentially mastered these days. LFP batteries offer better longevity and durability than nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) batteries that are more common in the West, albeit with less power density.

Still, the battery required extensively reworked electrolytes, separators and electrodes to reduce internal resistance by a claimed 50%, not to mention the latest version of BYD's direct refrigerant cooling system. But the result, BYD claims, is something that is both safe and can take this level of fast-charging punishment regularly.

In fact, BYD also claims improvements to the Blade battery mean a 35% increase in its high-temperature lifespan. "Megawatt charging will not affect the battery," a BYD spokesperson told me. "And the warranty policy is the same as the current Blade battery." (Warranties vary by market.)

None of this would be possible without the Megawatt charging station itself. At only five square feet (1.5 square meters) it's not that large, really. But it does pack incredible power: a maximum output of 1,360 kW. For context, America's most powerful charging stations are the Gravity fast-chargers in New York City, which can output up to 500 kW. The BYD system also has energy storage built into it, saving up power for fast recharges when the grid isn't up to snuff—or for deployment in more rural areas.

"The challenge lies in addressing both the vehicle and the 1000 kW charging pile," a BYD spokesperson said, referring to another term for a charging station. "It requires a comprehensive kilovolt architecture for the vehicle and solving the entire ecosystem for the charging piles."

Interestingly, BYD redesigned the plug, or "gun," to be better for women and smaller folks to use. It's the antidote to the bulky CCS fast-chargers we have in America that can often feel heavy and unwieldy for anyone without a good amount of upper-body strength. The gun is only 4.4 pounds, or 2 kilograms, and while it's not quite as sleek as a Tesla plug, it is definitely easier for me to hold than the average CCS plug I'd find back home.

So to get the most out of BYD's system, it's clear that you need its latest kilovolt-class cars—of which there are only two—and a Megawatt charger as well. Like any DC fast-charger, it will only supply those extreme charging speeds if your EV can take it. But even if you can't find a Megawatt charger, your Han L or Tang L has an extra surprise should you be able to park between two empty charging stalls.

That's because BYD's Super e-Platform cars can take two DC fast-chargers at once. Yes, really.

First Test: BYD's Dual-Gun Charging System A few EVs, namely those made by Audi and Porsche, have two charging ports. But one is usually the sole slot for DC fast charging. And no EVs can take two charging sources at the same time.

That is, unless they have a BYD badge. In order to maximize charging speeds for the times when a full-blown Megawatt charger isn't around, the Han L and Tang L carry two DC fast-charging plugs, and they can use both at the same time. This setup "can instantly transform existing supercharging piles into flash charging ones and fast charging piles into supercharging ones," as BYD puts it.

BYD has used this technology before on cars like the Denza D9 and Denza N7, two vehicles from its luxury brand. But on the Han L and Tang L, dual-gun charging goes to the next level. This latest system can use two 250 kW chargers to deliver speeds of about 500 kW at once. On two 180 kW fast chargers, you'd see speeds of about 360 kW.

That was the first order of the day in Beijing. BYD's crews plugged several Han L and Tang L EVs into two 250 kW stations at the same time. One vehicle I saw started with a 13% state of charge. When plugged into both stations, it started charging at almost 400 kW—more than I had ever seen before with my own eyes—in quick order. I watched it charge to 25% in about a minute.

That alone would be a monumental achievement for EV charging. But the main event was yet to come.

Second Test: BYD's Five-Minute Megawatt Charging

After a brief jaunt through Beijing afternoon traffic, aided by BYD's God Eye automated driving assistance system, our convoy arrived at a local dealership to try Megawatt charging. BYD's demonstration involved one car plugged into the Megawatt station while a projector screen showed the crowd of journalists the charging results.

By the way, contrary to some reports, Megawatt charging does not require the use of two charging guns; that's just a nice benefit if you're out and about and can access two fast-charging plugs at once. But to get to speeds of 1,000 kW, you only need one gun and BYD's special new charger. That was another pleasant surprise on this trip.

Once BYD's staff plugged the car in, it was off to the races.

The Han L sedan used in the test started at 13%. A "1002 KW" logo flashed across its driver display screen. The car leaped to that speed almost immediately, but then it quickly tapered off to about 767 kW. It got to 30% after just a minute and a half, then 40% after two and a half minutes, where it held steady at 633 kW.

About four minutes in, the car was at 50%. In a little under five minutes, the BYD folks called it: 60.10%, while still maintaining a charge speed of 463 kW.

Where it would've gone after that, I do not know. But in that short time plugged in, Han L gained 262 miles (421 km) of driving range. That's quick enough that your bladder—not the car—will be your limiting factor on most road trips.

Where BYD's Megawatt Charging Goes Next The most common criticism levied at BYD's Megawatt charging so far is that it's kind of overkill, an extreme approach that requires an extreme amount of electricity. Some say that perhaps solutions like more Level 2 charging ports everywhere, or simply ever-quicker conventional fast-charging, might be better.

But BYD insists that long charging times are still an obstacle in the way of getting more people to go electric, even in a country dominated by advanced EVs.

"Despite the advancements in EV technology, 'charging anxiety' remains the biggest pain point affecting the user experience," BYD's chairman and president Wang Chuanfu said in a statement. "To fully address this, our goal is to make the charging time of electric vehicles as short as the refueling time for gasoline cars—essentially achieving 'fuel and electricity at the same speed' when it comes to charging."

It's also true that to make the most of Megawatt charging, you need a car on BYD's Super e-Platform and access to a charger that, for now, is only made by BYD and only in China. And like all Chinese EVs, BYD's cars will likely be kept off American roads for years to come thanks to tariffs, software bans, alleged national security concerns and geopolitical tensions.

But after having experienced this for myself, I think it's wrong to dismiss this as anything less than an industry-upending breakthrough. It's not just faster charging; it's a way of reworking an entire vehicle platform, the battery and the charger itself to accommodate unprecedented speeds.

It's hard to believe that those technologies won't trickle down into other models over time. BYD officials hinted that its Denza and Yangwang brands could get the Super e-Platform at some point. It's conceivable other automakers could license the technology too, or build off the research and development that BYD has shown to be possible. The rest of the industry will learn from this, run with it and use it to make charging better and safer, even if it just makes the conventional experience better without going as extreme as 1,000 kW.

China's EV sector is already in a fast-charging arms race. Since BYD's announcement, the Geely Group brand Zeekr and smartphone-giant-turned-automaker Huawei have also announced their own mega-fast chargers. In fact, they're going even bigger, promising speeds of up to 1,200 kW and 1,500 kW. I like to think about how the various advancements it takes to even do that will spread across the rest of the car industry. Moreover, it's far more than just a one-off technical demonstration. BYD already has 500 Megawatt chargers set up across China. That's 40 times more stations than Ionna—a venture backed by the biggest legacy auto companies in the U.S.—has managed to put up so far, despite existing for longer and using proven tech. BYD is aiming to put up 4,000 Megawatt chargers eventually. It's clear the automaker is serious about this and others are going to follow.

This bell can't be unrung. Now, we get to find out if Western automakers and charging companies can answer the call, too.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Military/Veterans; Society; Travel
KEYWORDS: automotive; byd; ccp; china; commiecars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Red Badger

The answer is still no to EVs. They suck, especially Chinese ones but if I can’t hear it start, I ain’t driving it and if allows for hands off or self driving , I’m not getting in it. If I have to login to it, I’m not driving it.


21 posted on 05/11/2025 8:55:13 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

My first thought is some guy standing in a puddle charging at 1,000 volts.

But it’s not the volts…it’s the amps. LOL


22 posted on 05/11/2025 8:58:12 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

These make a bit of sense for some Chinese cities with bad air pollution; put fossil fuel powered plants far away and use EVs in the city.


23 posted on 05/11/2025 9:03:09 AM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Chinese lie. And they are famous for hiring shills to push their shoddy products.

CC


24 posted on 05/11/2025 9:07:22 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Cool. I can recharge every 20 miles at the next exit!! Pick up mcdonalds too but I just cant eat that much.


25 posted on 05/11/2025 9:08:10 AM PDT by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

I predict a lot of explosive results.


26 posted on 05/11/2025 9:14:59 AM PDT by Glad2bnuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I forsee explosions in the future. It’s a great strategy to get rid of cars. Force people to buy electric cars and then blow them up. China probably doesn’t need product liability insurance because they would just refuse to pay.


27 posted on 05/11/2025 9:16:40 AM PDT by webheart (Why not write out because instead of saying b/c and with instead of w/ ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Chinese are starting to innovate, not just copy. I suspect India will be doing the same within 10 years. The US already has serious competition at the leading edge of technology and it’s going to get worse.


28 posted on 05/11/2025 9:16:53 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts

Two minutes sooner!


29 posted on 05/11/2025 9:17:45 AM PDT by webheart (Why not write out because instead of saying b/c and with instead of w/ ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

How much legacy power is needed to fuel a fleet? Will solar, and wind provide it, or do we need Coal fired plants, NG fired plants, Dams, Nuclear power and a lot of it? I don’t don’t understand the point of all this, when the internal combustion engine is the best thing since sliced bread.

In short, get back to me when we have enough excess electrical power to drive personal vehicles for all, because it just doesn’t work without forcing the vast majority onto buses and into the big cities.


30 posted on 05/11/2025 9:19:04 AM PDT by Glad2bnuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And what would be the cost of the infrastructure needed to provide a few hundred thousand charging stations that can provide this voltage and this power?


31 posted on 05/11/2025 9:20:06 AM PDT by I want the USA back (America is once again GREAT! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Ask someone who drives a gasoline-powered car why they wouldn't want to get an electric one, and you're almost certain to hear this answer: they take way too long to charge.

That's one reason. Another is that charging stations are still few and far between unless you own a Tesla, and a third is that if the battery dies, it costs a fortune to replace it. An EV right now is a car to lease, not to own.

The only reason I'm considering an EV for my next car is Tesla's Full Self-Driving. The technology is fascinating, and when I'm ready for my next car in a couple of years, FSD should be far better than it is today, which is already damn good.
32 posted on 05/11/2025 9:21:58 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m not sitting on top of a giant battery. I’m not parking a giant battery by my home. I’m not crossing my fingers in the cold weather hoping the giant battery starts up.


33 posted on 05/11/2025 9:26:14 AM PDT by CaptainK ("No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Cool, we can use more of the coal and nat gas that powers the chargers faster now!


34 posted on 05/11/2025 9:29:43 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (The road is a dangerous place man, you can die out here...or worse. -Johnny Paycheck, 1980, Reno, NV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Competition is good.

It drives innovation.

Innovation benefits everyone..................


35 posted on 05/11/2025 9:31:54 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Don’t leave your family and pets in the car while it’s attached to 50,000 amps. Sitting on top of a potential lightning bolt while driving is no bargain either.


36 posted on 05/11/2025 9:34:28 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

“Full Self-Driving.”

You’d still get the drunk driving arrest when (not if) the accident happens.


37 posted on 05/11/2025 9:37:45 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I'm always skeptical when the CCP demonstrates a world-changing new technology.

While the article on BYD’s 5-minute EV charging presents a compelling case of innovation, there are good reasons to approach these claims with caution, especially given China’s track record with intellectual property theft, inflated technological claims, and tightly state-managed press access.

The demonstration was conducted under controlled conditions, using BYD’s own vehicles, chargers, and infrastructure, with no independent validation and only one Western media outlet invited. That lack of transparency raises red flags.

How BYD Could Have Staged the 5-Minute EV Charging Demo:

  1. Preconditioned Battery – Partially charged the battery beforehand to create the illusion of rapid charging.

  2. Fake Charge Readout – Manipulated the state-of-charge display to show inflated or misleading figures.

  3. Short Power Burst Only – Delivered a brief peak charge (e.g., 1,000 kW) without sustaining it, then showcased only the peak.

  4. Modified Test Vehicle – Used a special prototype or smaller battery not representative of production models.

  5. Controlled Charger Output – Faked or exaggerated charger performance without third-party measurement.

  6. Selective Data Presentation – Stopped the demo before charge tapering and thermal issues could occur.

  7. No Independent Verification – Allowed only friendly media with no technical oversight or raw data access.

  8. Range Inflation via Software – Tweaked algorithms to overstate range gained during charging.

In short, without third-party validation, this could easily be a staged PR event, not a verified technological breakthrough.
38 posted on 05/11/2025 9:53:26 AM PDT by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Weakening and dead batteries are my biggest pet leaves with today’s technology. That, and the fact that there is little one can do to fix them even if the battery is good.

Sorry, I still have lots of control over my gas powered vehicles, and there is not one gigantic item the failure of which will total them.


39 posted on 05/11/2025 9:59:02 AM PDT by MikeyB806
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts

No offense, but you are trying to approach this logically as well as presuming good intentions in their narrative. Our “leaders” want to cripple our infrastructure, our economy, resilience, and energy independence. None of this requires facts, logic, or reason. Unless or Until we accept they have bad intentions, none of this will make any sense.


40 posted on 05/11/2025 10:14:43 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson