Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data.
X.com ^ | 1:34 PM · Feb 8, 2025 | @amuse✓@amuse

Posted on 02/08/2025 3:51:50 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome.

Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence.

The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees.

This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship.

While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats.

Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned.

This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 98to0; abortion; clownbammystooge; consciencerule; constitution; doge; drewdays; elonmusk; enemieslist; enemyjudge; engelmayer; euthanasia; exparte; foureyeddouche; fraud; heshoulddance; howmanyarmies; impeachengelmayer; insurrection; interference; itstolaugh; iwbg; judicialmisconduct; judicialsedition; lawfare; lol; marcrich; newyork; noauthority; nojurisdiction; nutty; obamajudge; obamastooge; obstruction; odiousbamajudge; onesided; oneweek; paulaengelmayer; paulengelmayer; paymentsystem; politicaljudiciary; powersprincipalities; puto; religiousliberty; sdnewyork; sterilization; treasury; ustreasury; waronchristians; zerobamastooge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last

1 posted on 02/08/2025 3:51:50 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just ignore him. Do the Andrew Jackson.


2 posted on 02/08/2025 3:54:16 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

To paraphrase Andy Jackson, “He has made his decision. Now let him enforce it”.


3 posted on 02/08/2025 3:54:19 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Before you post a nasty, stop and think: "Would that person slap me if I said it in person?" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Have DOGE check the judge checked for USAID for payments.


4 posted on 02/08/2025 3:55:22 PM PST by Dutch Boy (The only thing worse than having something taken from you is to have it returned broken. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Agree. Ignore him.


5 posted on 02/08/2025 3:57:11 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Nitzy: New and Improved! Now with only 66% anti-semitic posts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Isn’t Brazil run like this?


6 posted on 02/08/2025 3:57:57 PM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

And the Joe Biden. How many times did he ignore Supreme Court rulings and forgive student loans.


7 posted on 02/08/2025 3:58:10 PM PST by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump can go down himself and look at it with Besset and some staff. Take all the media with him. Let him block that!


8 posted on 02/08/2025 3:58:35 PM PST by grumpygresh ( Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

bttt


9 posted on 02/08/2025 3:58:51 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This judge is truly evil:

Trump’s ‘conscience rule’ for health providers blocked by federal judge
Washington Post ^ | November 6, 2019 | Yasmeen Abutaleb
Posted on 11/6/2019, 1:27:55 PM by rdl6989

A federal judge on Wednesday voided the Trump administration’s “conscience rule” that would have allowed health-care providers to refuse to participate in abortions, sterilizations or other procedures they disagree with on religious or moral grounds.


10 posted on 02/08/2025 3:58:55 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustmilents offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Go and arrest him for Sedition, a quick trail and hang him at sunrise..


11 posted on 02/08/2025 3:59:20 PM PST by unread (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the REPUBLIC..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Arrest this tyrant for usurpation of power.


12 posted on 02/08/2025 3:59:31 PM PST by Marechal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

George Castanza has spoken.


13 posted on 02/08/2025 3:59:35 PM PST by Mark (DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The figurehead Treasury Secretary can seize his paycheck for failure to pay his taxes.


14 posted on 02/08/2025 3:59:57 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Yep.


15 posted on 02/08/2025 4:01:03 PM PST by sauropod (Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Who in the hell is running this country, the duly elected President and his administrative assistants or a gaggle of Marxist-appointed lower court judges? This is absolutely scandalous and the Attorney General should request the Supreme Court to conduct an expedited hearing to stop this travesty before it triggers a second civil war. By God enough is enough of this Communist assault on our Constitutional Republic!


16 posted on 02/08/2025 4:01:43 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (President Trump is America's long-awaited SUPREME Commander in Chief. Deus Vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Throw him jail for sedition until he proves his innocence. Isn’t that how democrats think of the accused?


17 posted on 02/08/2025 4:02:50 PM PST by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If nobody has access, I guess nothing can be paid.


18 posted on 02/08/2025 4:03:32 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Same judge:

Federal judge blocks Elon Musk’s DOGE access to critical Treasury payment system
2/8/2025, 10:34:13 AM · by kevcol · 188 replies
wtop.com ^ | February 8, 2025

Federal judge strikes down rule allowing clinicians to object to abortions for moral or religious(TR
11/7/2019, 5:26:28 PM · by bkopto · 56 replies
NBC News ^ | 11/6/2019 | elizabeth chuck


19 posted on 02/08/2025 4:03:36 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustmilents offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Heil, Obama. The guy looks like a leftover from the SS


20 posted on 02/08/2025 4:04:30 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson