Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Service members sue Trump administration over transgender military service ban
ABC 'News' ^ | 2/06/24 | Deena Zaru

Posted on 02/07/2025 4:30:37 AM PST by Libloather

Lambda Legal and Human Rights Campaign, two leading LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, filed a federal lawsuit on Thursday challenging the Trump administration over the president’s executive order banning transgender people from serving in the military.

The lawsuit, which was obtained by ABC News, was filed in the U.S. District Court-Western District of Washington on behalf of six active duty transgender service members, a transgender person seeking to enlist in the military, as well as Seattle human rights organization Gender Justice League.

"By categorically excluding transgender people, the 2025 Military Ban and related federal policy and directives violate the equal protection and due process guarantees of the Fifth Amendment and the free speech guarantee of the First Amendment," the lawsuit said. "They lack any legitimate or rational justification, let alone the compelling and exceedingly persuasive ones required. Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek declaratory, and preliminary and permanent injunctive, relief."

U.S. Navy Commander Emily "Hawking" Shilling, who according to the lawsuit has been serving in the military for 19 years, criticized the ban in a statement, saying that the measure is "not about readiness or cohesion, and it is certainly not about merit."

"It is about exclusion and betrayal, purposely targeting those of us who volunteered to serve, simply for having the courage and integrity to live our truth," Shilling said,

The lawsuit comes after President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 28, rescinding Biden administration policies that permitted transgender service members to serve openly in the military based on their gender identity.

The order directed the Department of Defense to revise the Pentagon’s policy on transgender service members and stated that "expressing a false "gender identity" divergent from an individual’s sex cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service."

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Military/Veterans; Science
KEYWORDS: ban; military; service; transgender; wdwashington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Libloather

“Western District of Washington”

TOTALLY not venue-shopping for corrupt Lefty federal “judges”...


41 posted on 02/07/2025 7:26:51 AM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Service members sue Trump administration over transgender military service ban

Wouldn't be a problem if they hadn't let f@ggots into the military in the first place.

Bill Clinton did that.

42 posted on 02/07/2025 8:49:53 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

True enough.

It’s good to make the point, that the military is very different from civilian life. There are many medical and mental conditions, which disqualify someone from military service.

Yet we are supposed to believe, that there is no problem, with someone getting these surgeries and hormone treatments, and that such people will not hamper the military readiness of their mission.

And now we see, certain people want to say, there is a constitutional right for people with obvious issues, to be in the military.


43 posted on 02/07/2025 9:18:03 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
One surrenders certain rights by either enlisting or being commissioned into the military. It’s just something a person has to accept. AND one serves at the pleasure of the Commander in Chief.

The same narcissism that drives people to mutilate themselves informs them that they are simply citizens wearing uniforms. They are not and I was not.

44 posted on 02/07/2025 10:31:37 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Qwapisking
a long time ago around 1974 or 1975 at a hospital i worked in, a swaby was in an car accident and brought into our ER, a short time later two swabs from Balboa Naval hospital arrived to “pick up our property” being a 19 yo i was floored by what they said.

the next day I ask my dad about that and his response to be was yep government issue..

45 posted on 02/07/2025 5:19:47 PM PST by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson