Posted on 01/18/2024 7:25:14 PM PST by Red Badger
Looking down the barrel of the First Light Fusion’s “Big Friendly Gun” – a two-stage gas gun that's used to generate fusion reactions by the impact of a high-velocity projectile on a specially-designed target. Photo: First Light Fusion
In my discussion (published starting here) with Paul Methven, head of Britain’s STEP program to build a first electricity-producing fusion power plant, Methven stressed that the program is open to more than one technological option.
While STEP is betting mainly on the spherical tokamak, it is supporting the formation of a “fusion cluster” that will include private fusion companies pursuing entirely different approaches. As far as fusion is concerned, the UK is not putting all its eggs in one basket.
During my recent visit to UK fusion facilities I had the opportunity to visit one of the most innovative of the companies involved, First Light Fusion, and to speak with its founder and CEO, Nick Hawker.
First Light is pursuing a new, innovative approach called “projectile fusion” in which fusion reactions are created by the impact of a projectile, accelerated to tremendous velocities, onto a cube-shaped target containing a tiny sphere of fusion fuel.
The target is designed in such a way that the powerful shock wave resulting from the projectile’s impact is intensified many times over and focused onto the fuel pellet, creating the ultra-high densities and temperatures required to generate energy by fusion reactions.
The primary innovation of First Light, and the key to its potential success, lies in the design of this “amplifier” technology.
As of now, First Light is still far from producing significant amounts of energy with this method, but its experiments have already yielded detectable amounts of fusion reactions.
This milestone result was first achieved in November 2021 with the help of a two-stage gas gun device, capable of accelerating projectiles to a velocity of 7 kilometers (km) per second. That corresponds to 25,200 km per hour, or more than 20 times the speed of sound.
The detection of fusion reactions provided strong evidence for the validity of First Light’s projectile fusion approach and the amplifier technology in particular.
To achieve fusion “breakeven” – more energy released than was absorbed by the fuel – will probably require about 10 times larger velocities. There is little doubt, however, that such velocities can be achieved through a relatively straightforward scale-up of existing technologies. First Light is progressing step by step toward that goal.
The BFG can accelerate projectiles to velocities of over 24,000 kilometers per hour. Photo: First Light Fusion
Could First Light’s approach work? At first glance, the proposed method looks like a long shot. But it turns out to have a solid physical and computational basis.
First Light Fusion evidently has significant support in the scientific community. Its board of advisors includes, among others, the eminent plasma physicist Steve Rose; Professor Jeremy Chittenden, co-director of the UK Center for Inertial Fusion Studies; Steven Chu, Physics Nobel Prize winner and former US Secretary of Energy; and Sir David King, who was the UK government’s chief scientific adviser from 2000 to 2007.
On January 23 this year it was announced that First Light Fusion and the UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) had signed an agreement for the joint design and construction of a new facility at UKAEA’s Culham Campus to house “Machine 4” – First Light’s next-generation fusion device. Machine 4 is intended to demonstrate a net energy gain by projectile fusion.
Similarities with laser fusion
First Light’s “projectile fusion” approach has certain features in common with laser fusion. To explain the similarities and differences, I’ll start with a few words about laser fusion.
The simplest version of ‘direct drive’ laser fusion: (1) Laser beams hit fuel pellet, (2) blowing off the outer layer, and generating reaction forces that compress the pellet to super-high densities (3) thereby triggering a fusion micro-explosion. Image: Creative Commons In the simplest approach of so-called direct drive, a huge pulse of laser energy is focused from all sides onto a tiny spherical fuel pellet. The outer layer of the pellet is instantly transformed into an explosively-expanding plasma, creating a giant pressure wave that compresses the pellet down to a fraction of its original size.
At the center, the pressure reaches over 10 Mbar – more than 10 million times atmospheric pressure. The fusion fuel is compressed to 1,000 times the density of its normal solid form, and its temperature rises to over 100 million degrees. The fuel pellet explodes like a tiny hydrogen bomb.
In this form of direct drive laser fusion, there are no magnetic fields to keep the fuel confined, as in a tokamak, but only its own momentary inertia. Hence the name inertial confinement fusion (ICF).
First Light’s “projectile fusion” method falls into the same category, inertial confinement fusion, but it uses a totally different method to compress the fuel.
Reaching super-high density is essential to all the many variants of ICF. Without super-compression not enough fusion reactions would occur, in the brief moment before the pellet flies apart, to release significant amounts of energy.
Future ICF power plants will necessarily operate in a pulsed mode, producing one or more micro-explosions per second. After each detonation, a new fuel-containing target must be introduced into the chamber.
Drawbacks of laser fusion
Laser fusion has a long history, going back to the 1960s. Although enormous progress has been made, this approach has drawbacks, especially with regard to the prospects for future commercialization.
One of the biggest challenges is to achieve a perfectly spherical implosion of the fuel pellet. Without that, hydrodynamic instabilities arise that spoil the compression process. Enormous effort and ingenuity went into solving this problem.
In its milestone achievement of fusion ignition, the US National Ignition Facility (NIF), employed an alternative method called “indirect drive”: The fuel pellet is suspended in the center of a cylindrical enclosure called a ”hohlraum”; the laser beams are directed through holes onto its walls, heating them to millions of degrees.
At that temperature matter emits X-rays. The hohlraum is instantly filled with a uniform field of intense X-ray radiation. Bombarded from all sides, the pellet implodes in a manner similar to what happens with direct drive.
Left: US National Ignition Facility laser bay Right: Schema of “indirect drive” Images: Creative Commons
While the results with “indirect drive” are encouraging, we should not forget that NIF, with its 192 laser beamlines, is the size of three football fields. Although cheaper and more efficient laser systems will no doubt become available, the basic fact remains that coherent laser light is an extremely “high quality” form of energy, inevitably more complicated and expensive to produce than energy in less coherent forms.
Projectile fusion and the ‘amplifier‘
First Light’s method, if it works out, would be an ideal alternative. The expensive, “high-quality” energy of a perfectly-timed burst of laser light is replaced by the far cheaper, “low-quality” kinetic energy of a flying projectile. And instead of having to focus energy onto a target from all sides simultaneously, we need only hit it on one side.
What makes this possible is a cube-shaped object that Hawker calls the “amplifier.” The amplifier transforms the shock wave, produced by the projectile’s impact on the side of the cube into a vastly more powerful set of shock waves that converge onto the fuel pellet.
Nick Hawker showing one of his company’s “amplifier” cubes. Photo: First Light Fusion
While details of its design are a proprietary secret, Hawker stresses that the underlying physical principles are well-known. These concern above all the nonlinear behavior of shock waves. Specifically, shock waves can be multiplied, intensified and focused by reflections on surfaces, passage through heterogeneous media and interactions between shock waves themselves.
As Hawker stresses, inventing the amplifier would have been impossible without the ability to accurately simulate these complex processes using powerful computers and sophisticated computer codes. Thanks to enormous progress it has become possible, in many cases, to substitute simulations for expensive and time-consuming experimental work. Thereby one can “play” with parameters and try out new ideas much more quickly.
I shall discuss the science behind the “amplifier” in the following article. Here I want to concentrate on the “easy” part: launching projectiles to super-high velocities.
The world’s fastest guns
It is estimated that to achieve fusion “breakeven” with First Light’s projectile fusion method, projectiles must be accelerated to velocities on the order of 60 kilometers per second, equivalent to 180 times the speed of sound, or 216,000 kilometers per hour. No one has so far been able to accelerate a macroscopic object to such velocities.
First Light is proceeding stepwise toward that goal.
“The Big Friendly Gun,” which I saw during my visit, achieves velocities of 7 km per second, or more than 25,000 km per hour. It is a two-stage cannon. The first stage uses exploding gunpowder to propel a piston down a tube. The piston compresses hydrogen gas in the second stage to 10,000 times atmospheric pressure, and the expanding gas accelerates the projectile.
This is the device First Fusion used in its first demonstration of fusion reactions by projectile fusion in November 2021.
Left: The author with First Light Fusion Founder and CEO Nick Hawker in front of the company’s ‘Big Friendly Gun.’ Right: Examining the target chamber with its neutron detectors. Photos: Jonathan Tennenbaum
It is worth noting that two-stage cannons of this sort have been built for a variety of purposes. NASA employs them, for example, to investigate the impact of micro-meteorites on spacecraft. They also provide a serious option for propelling payloads directly into space.
Back in 1966 a two-stage cannon, built by the High Altitude Research Project (HARP) of the US and Canadian defense departments succeeded in shooting an 84 kg projectile up to the suborbital altitude of 179 km.
A follow-on US government program, the “Super High Altitude Research Project” (SHARP), aimed at shooting specially-designed satellites directly into Earth orbit. SHARP was discontinued for budgetary reasons, but the goal is being pursued today by a private company, Green Launch.
To reach higher velocities, First Light has built a device called “Machine 3,” which is one of the largest so-called pulsed power devices in the world. Electricity, stored in capacitor banks, is discharged in millionths of a second through two small electrode plates situated at the center of the device. The combination of the high current and the magnetic field they generate produces a gigantic force of repulsion (the so-called Lorenz force).
With a suitable setup this force can be used to accelerate a projectile – referred to in the business as a “flyer plate” – to astronomically high velocities. The acceleration is so tremendous that the maximum velocity is reached already within the first few millimeters of its motion.
First Light Fusion’s 'Machine 3.' The blue boxes grouped around the target chamber are high-voltage capacitors, Photo: First Light Fusion
Hawker (L) with First Light Fusion’s ‘Machine 3.’ The blue boxes grouped around the target chamber are high-voltage capacitors. Photo: First Light Fusion
Machine 3 can produce velocities of about 20 km per second, three times the speed of the Big Friendly Gun.
The next step is “Machine 4,” which is designed to deliver velocities of 60 km per second, estimated as sufficient to achieve a net gain by fusion reactions. A projectile launched at that velocity from outside the Earth’s atmosphere would reach the Moon in less than 2 hours.
Although Machine 4 will be the world’s most powerful pulsed power device, the science and engineering principles involved are well-established. The Z-Machine at US Sandia National Laboratories, a giant, multi-purpose pulsed power facility, has already produced velocities of 45 km per second – the present world record.
Discharge of the Sandia Z-pinch machine in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. Photo: Sandia
From a purely scientific point of view, all of this is the easy part. In the following article, I shall turn to the hard part of the projectile fusion problem and recount the fascinating story of how the study of shock waves produced by a small undersea creature, the pistol shrimp, contributed to the genesis of First Light Fusion’s revolutionary “amplifier.”
Try not to destroy the world when you’re playing with this; OK fellas?
Most hydrogen atoms have a single proton in the nucleus. It takes 4 of them to make a typical Helium nucleus. When two protons are smashed together the chance of them staying together is extremely small. In the Suns core your typical proton will last over a billion years before it is converted to something else. Deuterium, which is a proton and a neutron has a half life of a few seconds in the Suns core.
Most hydrogen atoms have a single proton in the nucleus. It takes 4 of them to make a typical Helium nucleus. When two protons are smashed together the chance of them staying together is extremely small. In the Suns core your typical proton will last over a billion years before it is converted to something else. Deuterium, which is a proton and a neutron has a half life of a few seconds in the Suns core.
For the most part..............
Where do I sign up to work on this project? It looks like a lot of fun! :-)
... maybe we should just skip over fusion energy research and invest in dilithium crystal research. :-/
.
Do you happen to recall who has the ‘Fusion Ping List’?...........
IOW - they still don’t know/have enough to make it a reality in the next decade or two...
The trick is to get a sustainable fusion reaction without blowing the place up................
The good prof was being optimistic!
B4Lr
Typo: would = would say
This looks to be one of several ways to make H3. I’ve heard the fusion reactor companies say that they can make H3 from seawater. Its all expensive of course.
It is rare in nature and not immediately available for use in potential power plants. However, there is a process to produce tritium. For example, exposing the more common element lithium to energetic neutrons can generate tritium through a low-energy nuclear fission reaction.
This looks to be one of several ways to make H3. I’ve heard the fusion reactor companies say that they can make H3 from seawater. Its all expensive of course.
It is rare in nature and not immediately available for use in potential power plants. However, there is a process to produce tritium. For example, exposing the more common element lithium to energetic neutrons can generate tritium through a low-energy nuclear fission reaction.
The bigger point is- Would you build a gasoline engine before you located a source of oil? Probably not!
Interesting point you have made. Do you know the history of how oil and the internal combustion engine happened to be developed
Well they also need to get a continuous reaction out of it, or do they plan to constantly fire the gun 86,000 times a day? If they’re only getting power out for half a second each shot, even if it is net gain, how long before the barrel/’piston’ wears out? Or the hydrogen chamber? Each shot need to refill the hydrogen I assume? But that’s a lot of power to break even on replacing half the generator every other day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.