Watch: AI analysis says US Moon landing images are fake (Google AI)

UMMID ^ | 11/27/2023 | Staff

[Jan_Sobieski]

Neither the United States nor its space agency NASA have so far commented on the AI analysis that questioned the Moon Landing by the American astronauts.

[Google AI anslysis found that the U.S. Moon photos are fake, but thought images captured by Chines lunar rover are fine.]

Moscow: The analysis of some of the photos and images of the U.S. astronauts landing on the Moon using neural networks showed they are fake, Vladimir Putin was told at “Artificial Intelligence World Tour" in Moscow, and the Russian President found it interesting.

The video of the analysis result and conversation of the Russian President with the Data Research Department of Sberbank, Nikolai Gerasimhen, at the Moscow AI event is now viral.

“It (neural networks) thinks almost everything in this photo is fake”, Gerasimhen is heard explaining to Putin in the video shared by the Russian news agency, Sputnik, which is now being widely shared on different social media platforms.

At the same time the AI analysis did not find any fault with the photos captured by Chinese lunar rover.

“Meanwhile it (the AI analysis) raises no particular questions about this photo taken by a Chinese lunar rover”, Putin is told.

China's unmanned lunar mission named Chang’e is a series of lunar probes launched by the China National Space Administration starting with the launch of Chang’e 1 in October 2007.

“It believes this one is fake?” Putin is seen in the video first touching the wing of his nose and then asking after a brief pause while pointing at the Apollo 11 images displayed on a screen.

“Yes. Look this is red", Putin was told.

Sberbank President German Gref who is seen accompanying Putin in the video then said, "This is what Google’s neural network thinks, not our analysis…”

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

And which one ran against (and lost) to Nixon?

[yelostar]

[equaviator]

Whether it was the LRO or wherever it was that the gathering of the visual information took place, the point is that it has already been proven that the evidence is there and has been since July 20, 1969.

[Freedom4US]

You know this, and I know this.

Again. How do the Apollo denier fruits & nutbars explain this?

[Nateman]

The very first image of the far side of moon taken on October 7 , 1959. The Soviet Union did not have the technology for the film used to take that picture. The film was from a US spy balloon the Soviets had shot down over their territory.

After the Soviets lost the race to the moon they shut down their program and pretended they were not interested in beating the Americans . One of their rockets was actually converted into a trough to feed pigs on a farm. The Soviets knew they were beat , which is more than I can say for some truly gullible Americans.

[equaviator]

“How do the Apollo denier fruits & nutbars explain this?”

Maybe it’s because they have a hard time believing how something so great could ever have happened without their having been a part of the world in which it happened. They can’t “own it” so they discredit it like the incorrigible bunch of snot-nosed narcissistic bastards that they are.

[Freedom4US]

They can try to discredit the obvious proofs, what I’m asking though, is how does one look at the photographs and deny their authenticity? They have to believe the landing site images are faked, along with the contemporary 1960s and 1970s photographs. They’ll have to deny it over and over, because it won’t be too much longer before flights will be routine. NASA has indicated and international agreements have already been signed that basically treat the landing sites as “look but don’t touch”; they are concerned about souvenir hunters, and damaging what are important historical sites.