[equaviator]

“How do the Apollo denier fruits & nutbars explain this?”

Maybe it’s because they have a hard time believing how something so great could ever have happened without their having been a part of the world in which it happened. They can’t “own it” so they discredit it like the incorrigible bunch of snot-nosed narcissistic bastards that they are.

[Freedom4US]

They can try to discredit the obvious proofs, what I’m asking though, is how does one look at the photographs and deny their authenticity? They have to believe the landing site images are faked, along with the contemporary 1960s and 1970s photographs. They’ll have to deny it over and over, because it won’t be too much longer before flights will be routine. NASA has indicated and international agreements have already been signed that basically treat the landing sites as “look but don’t touch”; they are concerned about souvenir hunters, and damaging what are important historical sites.