Work is in progress on Bagster's new watch, standing guard over those who have gone before us. I hope to post the new content next thread.
|
Posted on 11/11/2023 12:09:03 AM PST by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Fox, NewsMax, many media outlets are reporting only that the Jan 06 videos have been released in their entirety. I provided my source for the focus restrictions, The Epoch Times. I have not had time to look at the video on my main computer; they will not play on this tablet.
Apparently the restriction does not apply to wide crowd shots, only where face recognition could cause security (?) problems.
That will sure be a prize-winning tactic. /mega sarc
Slip on down by the nearest McDonalds and imagine the staff (especially the management) all carrying M4's and going out on patrol. Or even just on a short walk to pick up trash.
Better yet, set up some plans to train some of those folks in operation of an M-1 tank...or a jet fighter. (Just thinking about that one makes my teeth hurt.)
Summary: Dumber than a stack of wet stones. But just about all we could expect from our current pack of "experts" in Washington.
Yes he did. I had the link to that somewhere but decided not to post that one.
Thank you.
I signed up for a free account. I still haven’t figured out how to download.
Can you point me how to ?
ROTFLOL!
I still want to see the decision appealed to get the judge’s decsiion about insurrection overturned.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 11/11/2023 Vol.479, Q Day 2206, SheepWhisperer wrote: You forgot the “instill despair”.
***
Your premise is not accepted and you are not the judge of intentions. What you’re doing is gaslighting.
...of course your reply will include more false premises and name calling. It’s what you do.
...all because I asked a simple question.
It’s been five years of “the plan”. Will you wait another five years?That will be ten years total...15-20% of your life waiting for “the plan”. At what point does one change his/her thoughts that there maybe is no “plan”?
It’s an honest question. Many have walked away from “the plan”, because in their observations, no plan is developing in any meaningful way
Because of this, these threads have become a bit nutty with quite antisocial behavior in defence of holding out for “the plan”.
At what point does someone change their mind?
A fairly simple question, which should be welcomed by reasonable and naturally curious people.However, the responses to this simple question are not normal healthy communication. Rather, the unnatural and angry responses, indicate defensiveness and pressure to conform to groupthink.
Imagine sitting at dinner with friends and you ask a question which challenges some beliefs around the table and the other guests rage at you, simply for asking a question and banish you to the other room to eat from a folding tv stand. That’s what the reaction here is like. Adults, secure in their knowledge, reason and intellect don’t behave this way.
Leftists behave that way, because they absolutely cannot tolerate views that differ from their own. Children do the same thing. In their minds, no independent thoughts are allowed.
Let us not behave like leftists and children
=o)
I'm skeptical every time I hear more from you because you share your disdain for us so freely, and because I recall your effort to start a defund FR effort. Yes, I know you've said that I intentionally mischaracterized your defund effort in the past, but that's what it was. So when I see your victim card posts, I sigh.
I never knew what 'started' that whole firestorm of disruption that went on for over a year, which included i your calls to withhold donations to FR, until I was searching an old thread today. *FacePalm* I can't believe our entire thread had to endure repeated tsunamis of victim angst over THAT!!!
In addition to viewing your lobbying to withold donations a clear attempt to 'Defund FR', I'm also skeptical of your 'simple question' because forum trolls were asking us that same 'simple question' from the start of the Q threads. Sometimes they'd just show up and start in with the abuse and when met with hostile responses, blurt out "But I was just asking a question!" even though they forgot to ask a question. I recall Bagster asking one, "What was your question..." and getting no response because that troll forgot to play that card first.
One of our thread disrupters was called on his doom posts, and what do you know, he blurted that he was being attacked for 'just asking a question' (referring to an entirely different post he made). The 'Just asking a question' can be said by anyone, friend or foe, but on these threads it's almost always foe.
We know exactly what you meant. Your pals know, and the rest of us know.
There are many different opinons on this thread about Q and the Storm. I'm one who is astounded and blessed by all the progress made and plan to post about it soon. I respect those who disagree with me; I don't try to bait them and then denigrate them when I don't get the response I want.
You're here to tell us, according to phrases I've taken from your post, that if we don't play interested host to your loaded question, or reject it (*gasp*), we're behaving like we're 'nutty', 'antisocial', 'unnatural and angry', 'defensive' and conforming to 'groupthink', insecure in our 'knowledge, reason and intellect', similar to 'leftists' thinking and childlike, and unable to entertain independent thoughts.
Gosh, I have NO IDEA why anyone would think you're trying to disrupt or demoralize. NO IDEA.
Based on your posts, I definitely believe you are here working to demoralize and yes, I can have an opinion about your intentions.
Imagine sitting at dinner with friends and you ask a question which challenges some beliefs around the table and the other guests rage at you, simply for asking a question and banish you to the other room to eat from a folding tv stand. That’s what the reaction here is like. Adults, secure in their knowledge, reason and intellect don’t behave this way.
If any adult ends up in Festival eating from a folding tv stand, it means they brought that TV stand to Festival with them as part of their VICTIM STATUS posturing.
For those who may be reading along in Rio Linda, Festival is being targeted lately because it has historically been a useful location to have side conversations. For example, if some are engaged in highly specific topics requiring advanced knowledge to participate, those participants may be asked to move the conversation to Festival few can follow the topic and so interest is limited. Or perhaps religious debates, which given their passionate, heart-felt nature, can sometimes offend more than inform. Sometimes our friends can't agree and we can't assist in resolving their disagreement, so after awhile, they may be asked to continue their debate in Festival.
Festival has successfully been used by those who object to my presence - they gathered to talk about how domineering, ignorant and devious I am. Their conversation took place without disrupting the main thread. I've posted in Festival - discussed content of limited interest to others and asked for help with html coding etc. Festival works.
I believe the push these days to portray Festival invitations as insulting is primarily being conducted by disrupters to try to deligitimize its use, make it an insult, and thereby keep all their disruptive actions on the active thread as much as possible. Sadly, that means they may 'need' to deceive some innocent bystanders into feeling offended if asked to move content to Festival.
So there's an effort to stigmatize Festival as unacceptable to free speech. Free Speech is the last thing disrupters want - they try to discourage us, drive us off the Q thread, convince us Q is a failure/larp, convince us we are stupid, biased, failures, wasting our time etc. That whole "FREE SPEECH!" thing they do is just another tactic; and they do it by claiming we're suppressing THEIR free speech!
Recently, one of their kind picked up a beautiful, encouraging meme on our thread, defaced it with bird feces and posted it back to the thread, and when it was deleted snarked about others being prevented from viewing it (FREE SPEECH VIOLATION!); that same person previously posted disinformation meant to close down the Q thread completely, and used to target women with lewd, sexuallly abusive posts.
These people are not about fairness, free speech etc. That's just the ghillie suit they wear to blend in and harness the good in others for their own disruptive purposes.
I'm tired of seeing the 'victim card' thrown around as if the Q thread is the CCP gulag. "Questions have to be pre approved! BLAH BLAH BLAH." No one forces you to come back again and again to tell us your low opinion of us. Your colleagues proudly share your dislike of Q and despise us as you do - try to understand that your kind is in the minority, and the rest of us would just like to converse and post in relative peace, spiced with our natural disagreements, and disparate world views and analysis.
Stop trolling us. You don't like the Q movement, think it's failed, you've poured one negative opinion after another on us. Your repetitious chiding and insults are worn out, as is your VICTIM CARD.
As you say, there are ways to determine some individuals with known identifiable characteristics. Just what the above means exactly is beyond my ken; but the legal defense teams are upset at the restriction. If the video can be viewed as normal, what is to keep someone from capturing the video pictures? I just don't really understand but it doesn't sound good. ❓❓
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
