Work is in progress on Bagster's new watch, standing guard over those who have gone before us. I hope to post the new content next thread.
|
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 10/21/2023 8:17:51 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
Childishness |
Posted on 10/10/2023 8:04:55 PM PDT by ransomnote
Have you seen President Trump's powerful 4 minute video message? Don't miss it!
A NATION IN DECLINEQ has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
This is beyond Sharks with “lasers”
This is (dare I say it) - “Jews with “lasers””
.
I’m finding it comical that the Band of Bothers seem to have conveniently forgotten that JR himself asked Easy St to post elsewhere a couple of threads ago. I’m pretty sure JR means what he says.
If he tells you to stop posting to a particular thread, it’s ridiculous to get upset when your subsequent posts to that thread get removed.
Just more sowing the seeds of discord, when we should be united in fighting a deadly enemy...
MarQ
‘All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others’
The article says the optimal dosage is 5 grams a day of creatine monohydrate. (probably for those with a typical diet, more may be required for those with less of it in their diets)
Re Byrd:
That’s fascinating. Kerry visited Antarctica, McMurdo station around 2016:
Secretary of State John Kerry is scheduled later this week to visit McMurdo and Amundsen-Scott South Pole stations in Antarctica, where he’ll meet with researchers funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF).
Kerry is set to become the first secretary of state, and the most senior U.S. government official, to travel to Antarctica, where the U.S. has maintained a scientific presence since the late 1950s.
The secretary’s Antarctic visit is scheduled to take place Nov. 10-12 as part of a global tour.
NSF manages the U.S. Antarctic Program, through which it makes awards to researchers across the nation and provides the logistical infrastructure to support U.S. scientific research on the southernmost continent.
“We are honored that Secretary Kerry will visit NSF’s facilities in Antarctica, a vast and globally important region,” NSF Director France A. Córdova said. “He will meet with researchers whose work forges new frontiers in science.”
Kerry’s Antarctic itinerary includes a visit to NSF’s facilities in Christchurch, New Zealand, the gateway city to Antarctica.
While in Antarctica, Kerry will visit McMurdo Station, NSF’s logistics hub and the largest of the three U.S. Antarctic Program stations. There, he’ll meet with scientists studying a wide range of subjects, from geophysics and glaciology to astrophysics and biology as well as the effects of climate change. Two of NSF’s Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites are located in Antarctica, including one near McMurdo Station in the McMurdo Dry valleys.
The secretary will then visit Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, located at the earth’s southern axis atop the 9,300-foot high, ice-covered Antarctic plateau. Amundsen-Scott is the site of long-term atmospheric monitoring and large-scale, cutting-edge astrophysics and particle physics experiments.
https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=190287
.
They didn’t point out the Midol in that picture... I think her husband should reconsider coming home after work.
Dr Simone Gold asks followers what the most egregious lie about Covid was:
https://truthsocial.com/@DrSimoneGold/posts/111241404020398850
People are waking up, ever so slowly.
Russian Royalty Payments To Foreign Artists Collapse As Russians Choose Domestic Artists
US Foreclosure Activity Soars
https://www.thefinancialtrends.com/2023/10/15/us-foreclosure-activity-soars/
Microsoft To Appeal $29 Billion IRS Payment Demand
https://www.thefinancialtrends.com/2023/10/15/microsoft-to-appeal-29-billion-irs-payment-demand/
So are pretty pictures no longer allowed here? To save bandwidth perhaps? If so, they all should go.
RE: Mike Rogers meme
*************************
😂
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 10/10/2023 Vol.476, Q Day 2174, stylin19a wrote: Cletus is calling out about EasySt’s benign posts being delete in a heartbeat.
He's also expressing an opinion about the direction of this thread that you disagree with.
Who is right and who is wrong ? they are opinions...either or both are right and wrong.How does it not directly affect the thread ? ...which you want to protect.
If it happens to him here, it can happen to you or anyone else elsewhere.
It's not right.Why haven't you called this quick delete (thread ban?) out ?
what does any of your post have to do with this crap delete move???I can't remember this happening to any one else. Usually, a poster gets banned.
Jim and\or John Rob do not need to be bugged about this if it can be reconciled here.
Who\What admin mod is doing it ? Do you know ? Can you stop it ?
Otherwise, it seems the JRobs should be told about this. It stinks.
First let me say I'm stunned you feel I owe you an answer after you've previously posted abusively to me whenever it suits you. When I copied posts showing that you were disrupting/deflecting with a troll tactic, you denied it. Even when I asked you not to post to me because you are often abusive, "unless thread business" you replied to that post with more insults, claiming it was 'thread business'. You don't 'do' accountability, so I don't believe I need to account for myself to you.
But using your post may serve my own purposes so that others may know how I feel about it.
Cletus is calling out about EasySt’s benign posts being delete in a heartbeat.
ransomnote: You surely recall that Jim Rob asked Easy to post on other threads. Let's make that clear - all persons objecting to the deletion do so in the face of Jim's request he not post on the Q threads.
Since those objecting to the deletion know about Jim's request, then it's likely his Admins remember as well. I say admins because you stress 'in a heartbeat'. To me that means it's likely that there was already a Mod or Jim himself on thread.
I don't know if FR has a filter for that purpose (automated - our IT at work put a filter on our internal email so that the head of IT could be alerted to any email that mentioned him by name). IF filtering is possible for posts or user accounts, it might explain the rapidity of the deletion. I don't think it would be a person reporting it because I think it would take longer for admin to receive, read, respond.
I think the issue with Easy's posts, benign or not, is that he has been asked to post on other threads by the board owner. I thought Easy's reply to Jim's request was snark but signalling intention to comply (i.e., "You're welcome" to Jim's polite "Thank You"), but your mileage may vary. Easy returned with neutral posts and then went back to the original complaint re keywords and HG. So it seems neutral posts will likely be interspersed with renewed complaints. But I'm guessing.
When Jim Rob asks someone not to post on a thread, I don't think it matters whether their posts on that thread are deleted slowly or quickly. It's his house, his rules.
This is a basic disagreement I have with Cletus and those who are MOST bitter about the direction of our threads. I don't see complaints working to force Jim to do what users want. If it were me and I thought the FR policy to swift or unjust - I wouldn't waste time warning people on thread over and over through the years, that we can't trust management etc. I would take it up with Jim Rob. He would likely tell me that if I don't like it, I can leave. He would be correct.
He's also expressing an opinion about the direction of this thread that you disagree with.
Who is right and who is wrong ?they are opinions...either or both are right and wrong.
ransomnote: Who is repetitive? Who ridicules? Who demeans? Who discourages people from remaining on the Q thread?
Those complaints Cletus makes about the 'direction of this thread' and modding have been expressed ad naseum and tend to have a lashing, often discouraging if not insulting, quality. Having an opinion, sharing an opinion are different from venting your anger on others again and again for something they can't change.
There was, as I regret to recall, an entire season of mortification wherein I was embarrassed to wade through Cletus' repetitious, vulgar, juvenile assertions that Jim Rob or Admin (or both, I forget) had bagster's 'almonds in a jar'. I *facepalmed* the first time I read that series of posts. When Cletus wrote that the Mod(s) had her hand upon bagster's almonds, I posted to admin a mortified apology that one of ours would post like that. I didn't need to, of course, I was just mortified in the moment.
WHY did Cletus keep posting posting posting about bagsters almonds in a jar, supposedly in FR's possession? Because Cletus didn't like FR Modding policy and was trying to manipulate Bagster into contending with Admin on his behalf. It went on for several posts! All the while I was a) embarrassed on behalf of the thread and b) incredulous that Cletus was too afraid to take on admin himself, but was willing to ridicule others for not doing it for him. By his own standards, management would have to have HIS ...ah..in a jar, too.
That was just one of Cletus's themes for complaints about FR and the mods, and that was years ago - pre-Covid. It's not like this theme of repression and 'watch your back' warning is new. It's the repetition, warning and often weaves in ridicule of others.
These aren't just opinions. These are his denigrating remarks repeated at a rate that suggests to me an attempt at indoctrination. We heard it before - some likely have involuntarily memorized it (if I could unsee the 'almonds in a jar' SERIES of posts, I would be grateful).
My restaurant analogy was apt - Cletus is here, he's disgusted, and he won't stop telling us about it, but he himself will not contend with Jim or admin mod.
If Cletus believed half of what he says about the Q thread, and FR management, he'd have left years ago. I think he's still working to drive OTHERS to leave this supposedly 'abusive environment' or to contend with FR management on his behalf.
Regardless, venting on us repeatedly is disruptive. It's not discussion; I doubt anyone wants to have Cletus vent on them if they were to post in disagreement.
Today's outraged posts are an example - most of the people speaking up for EasySt are causing a stir even though they know why the post was deleted; Jim's 'No' means 'No'. I see no value in being angry about the speed of deletion.
All frustration,anger and demands for accountability over 'No means No.'
How does it not directly affect the thread ? ...which you want to protect.
If it happens to him here, it can happen to you or anyone else elsewhere.
It's not right.Why haven't you called this quick delete (thread ban?) out ?
ransomnote: Jim Rob said it would be best if Easy posted on other threads. Easy ignored Jim's request and returned to post on two occasions - his posts on both threads were deleted. That definitely can happen to me or to anyone else elsewhere and there's nothing I could do to stop it. It's not like Jim is going to maintain Free Republic for people ignore his requests and tell him they'll do whatever they want with his website.
what does any of your post have to do with this crap delete move???ransomnote: I'm making the point that I'm not objecting to just a post, but to a worn out series of ridicule and complaint that has gone on too long, years. Portraying FR as abusing free speech and untrustworthy has the same effect as the Cletus attempt to shut down our thread because he proclaimed us clowns and our thread a joke.
I don't object to his opinion, or him posting that opinion more than once, but venting his anger on us FOR YEARS, again and again, over circumstances he knows we can't change impacts thread moral. It's just more of the same disruption. Circling around ridiculing people, the Q thread, management - falsely portrays our Q thread and FreeQs, and JimRob/FR as people and places to be avoided. There seem to be enough of us here who, while we may take serious issue with policies or posts at times, believe our efforts, our thread, our people, our Fearless Leader is worth our time or we would leave. I'm not saying perfection; I'm saying WORTH OUR TIME AND EFFORT. For many of us, that's years of effort.
I can't remember this happening to any one else. Usually, a poster gets banned.
ransomnote: Aren't you glad he wasn't banned? As I said, because of the speed at which it was deleted, I believe it's either an automated filter or a mod present on the thread. Some people have told me we need our own Q thread mod. Maybe we have one.
I was on a forum thread once where there was an uproar and demands that a mod be brought to justice. I about fell outta my chair when Jim Rob replied to the angry poster that he had deleted the posts in question. That's the last time I tried to figure out who deleted a post.
I view FR as Jim's property and I view us as guests. We could read it without posting, but he granted us free accounts from which to post and share email. At that point, I realize I may not like everything and it may not go 'my way' but I wanted the place to read, post, email etc. and was willing to accept it and comply with Jim's requests/rules for as long as it serves my purposes.
Jim and\or John Rob do not need to be bugged about this if it can be reconciled here.
ransomnote: I think you're mistaken. Jim and/or John Rob are the only ones who can answer your questions with facts and decide if they want to modify rules etc. I speak as one previously and repeatedly blamed for House Rules when those doing the blaming know I didn't make them and can't change them.
Who\What admin mod is doing it ? Do you know ? Can you stop it ?
ransomnote: As I mentioned before, I am out of the 'guess the admin mod' business so I don't know who did it. I have no access to that kind of information. I would not attempt to tell Jim Rob, "if Easy ignores your request to stop posting on the Q thread, just stand back and let him have his way or people will get angry."
Otherwise, it seems the JRobs should be told about this. It stinks.
ransomnote: Please tell the JRobs about your concerns. Please be the one to follow through. No one else has been brave enough to do so in 6 years of posting on this thread. I'm always asked to explain or blamed for complying with FR rules when there's no possible chance I can change things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
