Posted on 07/09/2023 10:14:11 AM PDT by Libloather
A Republican GOP state senator could face criminal charges for revenge porn after sharing explicit images of Hunter Biden on social media.
Arizona Senator Wendy Rogers retweeted footage of the First Son to her 300,000 followers on Twitter, which included several X-rated images.
Posting online, Rogers – a staunch advocate for former President Trump - said: 'It's all here in black and white. Oh, and apparently in NBC living color.'
She has since removed the footage and has been warned that her social media post was a 'mistake' by another Republican – who claims she didn't realize the images were in the footage.
Lawyers have also warned that by posting the X-rated images, she could find herself in hot water legally.
Tom Ryan told Arizona's Family: 'It's not a defense if she later took them down, which appears she has done.
'Any more than it would be a defense if you robbed a Circle K and later gave the money back, you don't get to wipe out the robbery.'
He added that she may have even breached Arizona's revenge porn law, which means that intentionally posting a sexual image without consent is a criminal offence.
State Senate President Warren Petersen, released a statement saying: 'Rogers didn't realize those images were in that video until it was brought to her attention, and she immediately removed the video from her feed.'
It is not the first time that Rogers has found herself in hot water, and was last year censured by the state Senate following a pre-recorded speech she made for a white nationalist conference.
During the speech, she called for those she viewed as her 'enemies' to be hung from the gallows.
Rogers recently pushed for legislation that would ban anyone under the age of 18 from accessing porn...
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Yep, I don’t need to see naked photos of Hunter Biden to tell me something I already know, that he’s a perverted degenerate!
McArizona... what an embarrassment
Public figures have less privacy rights than private individuals.
It can be fairly argued that Hunter Biden is a public figure.
How can that be revenge porn if it’s just fake Russian propaganda?
Also, his computer was abandoned property and the new owner put it into the public domain (I believe). There is zero expectation of privacy for what was on that computer.
It was already in the public’s access. No way this is successful.
Democrat position #1: “There is no evidence.”
Republican counter-move: “Here is the evidence.”
Democrat position #2: “Oh, you’re in a lot of trouble now! You can’t show that stuff to people! Why can’t you be like the rest of us and pretend that it doesn’t exist??
Just send a copy to school library and he is covered.
Weren’t the Hunter files read into the Congressional record?
So uncovering, documented corruption of our sitting president is now labeled “revenge porn” when Brandon is caught repeatedly groping and sniffing? LOL. I’m starting to understand the statement- they won’t be able to walk down the street. Walking after them would take too much energy when they’re clearly self destructing. May it not be to late for them to repent of their sin.
I’ve been saying this for a year; the reason the worst of the pictures on Hunter’s laptop are not being made public is because whoever publishes them will be distributing child porn. I really believe that. Guilliani has basically said that.
The Tom Ryan who apparently has never heard of Sullivan? Laughable.
Ryan should be brought up on ethics charges to the Arizona Bar for attempting to interfere with legislative business where he had no interest.
This country is filled to the brim with junk laws.
Did she sleep with him?
No?
Then it’s not revenge porn.
The word is 'hanged'. 'Hung' is what Moochelle Obama is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.