Images Show Mars Has Extreme Global Warming

ABC News ^ | December 7, 2001 | Amanda Onion

[grundle]

It might seem like the weather’s getting warmer here on Earth, but Mars appears to have an even bigger global warming problem.

High-resolution images snapped by NASA’s Mars Global Surveyor show that levels of frozen water and carbon dioxide at the Red Planet’s poles have dwindled dramatically — by more than 10 feet — over a single Martian year (equivalent to 687 days or about two Earth years).

[Rocco DiPippo]

"Images Show Mars Has Extreme Global Warming"

Excellent! Now all the "Climate Catastrophe" hysterics have a place to apply their nutbag theories to.

C'mon Musk, get going on building a rocket big enough to send all those clowns to Mars. . .

[Openurmind]

Lol... “Global Warming” isn’t enough so they have to invent Solar System Warming...

Absolutely incredible...

Next up Galaxy Warming and Universe Warming.

It is insanity of the first order.

[Vaduz]

Couldn’t be the solar flares huh Moe.

[justrepublican]

No, we will be able to move there

[Deplorable American1776]

Now I’m curious! What does MARVIN THE MARTIAN drive? I mean he must be driving in a SUV since Mars is warming. I need to know... 🤓

[Mark17]

No, we will be able to move there

Maybe that’s why the powers that be, are planning on populating Mars, to get away from earthly global warming. Maybe they have more information than we do. 😀😆😊

[Ezekiel]

Martians are green, so how could this be?

[Deplorable American1776]

You can’t blame Marvin. He did want to destroy Earth. We are the problem...🤓

[Brooklyn Attitude]

“NASA did research on that.”

Thanks. Do you have a reference or time frame?

[sit-rep]

right!! earth’s climate change is sooooooo fkng bad, its effecting climate on Mars as well!! smmfh...

[Deplorable American1776]

Either you, Trump or Evil MAGA Republicans...

Never ever nature doing normal activities.

[ealgeone]

Well, la de da!

[Deplorable American1776]

Not yet, they want to see if Marvin related to DeSantis before they rule on it. 🤓

[Wuli]

I see, and the sun has zero to do with the issue, right??? /sarc

[StolarStorm]

It was back around 2005. I’ve been looking for the research paper. It used to be online but can’t find it on google now. I did find a few references in articles that refuted similar conclusions. Funny how the refutations are searchable but not the actual paper itself. It appears to have been scrubbed. Welcome to 1984.

[Brooklyn Attitude]

Thanks for checking. I found an article from about the same time period. It said that people had refuted the finding but how. Not surprising that a finding would destroy the biggest source of climate funding and an excuse for total govt control would be “refuted”.

[StolarStorm]

I also found this article: https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases-all?ID=0DF9B3CD-802A-23AD-4984-5AC0C6D42605

But what I read was from NASA itself. I can't find ANY reference to that paper. Wild. I may have it an archive somewhere, and if I run into it I'll pass it along... even if it's a dead link.

[Brooklyn Attitude]

“I may have it an archive somewhere, and if I run into it I’ll pass it along... even if it’s a dead link.”

Thanks again.

[Retain Mike]

I have yet to find any article which attempts to measure the influence of the sun and ocean and then ascribe an increment to human activity. It was only since the late 70’s that it was possible to attempt to confirm changes in the sun’s radiance on Mars independent of its effect on earth. Without a rigorous solution involving those two enormous engines, models created provide outcomes no more elegant than what is left behind when a brand new puppy is turned loose in a house decorated with white carpets and white furniture.

Even before that time any true scientist would have said data collected could not be analyzed, because people had known for centuries the sun was a variable star and it was not possible to separate influences for any mathematical computations. Now that it is possible to separate the influence of the sun but not the oceans, the analysis of such a complicated interaction is still highly problematic. Therefore, political rhetoric must be substituted for application of the scientific method.

THE SUN DEFINES THE CLIMATE

http://www.gaoran.ru/english/astrometr/abduss_nkj_2009.pdf

NO EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR THE SIGNIFICANT ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGE

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf

[SunkenCiv]

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...

---

join or quit view topics view or post blog bookmark post new topic subscribe

---