Posted on 02/22/2023 6:25:19 PM PST by Golden Eagle
Far and away the most common question I get from those who took one of the COVID-19 vaccines is: “how do I get this out of my body.” The mRNA and adenoviral DNA products were rolled out with no idea on how or when the body would ever breakdown the genetic code. The synthetic mRNA carried on lipid nanoparticles appears to be resistant to breakdown by human ribonucleases by design so the product would be long-lasting and produce the protein product of interest for a considerable time period. This would be an advantage for a normal human protein being replaced in a rare genetic deficiency state (e.g. alpha galactosidase in Fabry’s disease). However, it is a big problem when the protein is the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 Spike. The adenoviral DNA (Janssen) should broken down by deoxyribonuclease, however this has not be exhaustively studied.
This leaves dissolution of Spike protein as a therapeutic goal for the vaccine injured. With the respiratory infection, Spike is processed and activated by cellular proteases including transmembrane serine protein 2 (TMPRSS2), cathepsin, and furin. With vaccination, these systems may be avoided by systemic administration and production of Spike protein within cells. As a result, the pathogenesis of vaccine injury syndromes is believed to be driven by accumulation of Spike protein in cells, tissues, and organs.
Nattokinase is an enzyme is produced by fermenting soybeans with bacteria Bacillus subtilis var. natto and has been available as an oral supplement. It degrades fibrinogen, factor VII, cytokines, and factor VIII and has been studied for its cardiovascular benefits. Out of all the available therapies I have used in my practice and among all the proposed detoxification agents, I believe nattokinase and related peptides hold the greatest promise for patients at this time.
(Excerpt) Read more at petermcculloughmd.substack.com ...
Ok great. I appreciate that. I said earlier that I believe there is a lot of good in you. I’d just like to have you on my side more in this battle, which is being much more skeptical of Big Gov and Big Pharma, who basically hold all the cards, verses being skeptical of little people like Dr. McCullough, who I believe to be an honest man, who had his life destroyed by the medical establishment.
That is not a challenge for you to now unload all you believe you know about McCullough, just for you to further consider who is David, and who is Goliath, in this battle. Thanks.
It’s easy to a sympathize with an underdog. It’s human nature. I have done it myself. More than you can guess.
But when it comes to truth and facts, there are only truth and facts. I am not interested in a “side”. Sides be damned. I am only interested in truth and facts.
If you like to think you are on the side of David vs Goliath, fine. It looks to me more like a case of Big Gov/Pharm vs Snake Oil grifters. Color me cynical. Perhaps I am.
You don't believe in supplements? How about N-A-C? Are you aware the FDA tried to have the supplement banned, until they were sued over it? Is N-A-C "snake oil?" BTW, "snake oil" was actually the big city pharmaceutical product of the time, not a natural supplement.
In other words, nobody to like on either “side”. It’s certainly not easy, but you gotta get into the nitty gritty and press and press to find truth and facts. No, it’s not easy. Unless you simply believe one side (Fauci & Friends) or the other (Kirsch, Naomi, etc.).
Take either side to task ... and you start to get interesting questions.
But it is far easier and more comfortable to pick a side. I can’t blame anyone for doing that. Respect their stance is another matter.
Nope. Not picking a “side” here. Truth and facts only. Again, this is a freaking virus. Why allow the Dems to politicize it? Why fall into their trap? Why should there be “sides” when it comes to a stupid virus? It’s ridculous!
= = = = = =
The fatal flaw in your stratagem, is that you use ad hominem to discredit what you call a "side" (*) while being tactfully reticent about open deliberate, constant, continuous bald-faced lies on the other side as well as the tens of billions of dollars of profit accruing to that side.
And, you go out of your way to attack any studies showing efficacy for non-jab approaches to COVID; and go out of your way to belittle any evidence for widespread harm from the jabs: while exaggerating, and presenting as "typical" of the side, the most click-baity attacks on the jabs, ignoring the rigorous ones.
(*) not just you. Peter Hotez wrote an editorial in Nature attacking what he called the "Disinformation Dozen" (and which he associated with, I'm not kidding, Russia, Russia, Russia. It's *always* the same playbook, and always the same solution: more draconian power)
Interesting.
On masks:
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=240690
also
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf
Quite simple to me.
An unnecessary "vaccine" was rushed through at "warp speed" under the pretense it would stop the spread of the new flu (0.5% death rate), which turned out to be a lie, and the carnage per the official government stats is 3 times more deaths resulted from that vaccine than all other vaccines in history, combined.
Verses what, people who are upset about that, and are having to fight to even get their hands on data to review, because the vaccine creators/approvers have tried to hide or destroy it all?
That is your take, and you are entitled to it. Good night.I am getting tired here, understandable given my time zone.
Sleep well and be well!
Thank you, you too!
“An unnecessary “vaccine” was rushed through at “warp speed” under the pretense it would stop the spread of the new flu (0.5% death rate),”
The vaccines were designed to target the spike of the original archaic virus. The archaic virus and the variants sharing its spike ceased to circulate after the vaccines were released. Explain how that is a “pretense to stop the spread”. Maybe according to your reasoning it’s purely a coincidence that the archaic virus died out, leaving behind only Omicron with its unique spike.
As for the “0.5% death rate”, how exactly would that be known in 2020 when Warp Speed was launched? Covid isn’t a flu virus despite what the ignorant like to tell themselves. It’s a SARS virus and the only other SARS outbreak killed nearly 10% of those infected. Its cousin virus MERS killed 30%. That was the reason why virus hunters were scared of Covid. They didn’t have the luxury of knowing what future data would reveal.
What are you talking about?
New estimate by CDC reduces COVID-19 death rate to just 0.26% (IFR) from WHO’s 3.4% (CFR)
Sun 24 May 2020
For the first time, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has given a realistic estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, which in its most likely scenario is 0.26 %. They estimate a 0.4 % fatality rate among the symptomatic cases. If you consider their projection that 35% of all infected cases remain asymptomatic, the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) drops to just 0.26 %. This is almost exactly what the Stanford researchers had projected in April 2020.
Thanks for that
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.