Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CatHerd

In other words, nobody to like on either “side”. It’s certainly not easy, but you gotta get into the nitty gritty and press and press to find truth and facts. No, it’s not easy. Unless you simply believe one side (Fauci & Friends) or the other (Kirsch, Naomi, etc.).

Take either side to task ... and you start to get interesting questions.

But it is far easier and more comfortable to pick a side. I can’t blame anyone for doing that. Respect their stance is another matter.

Nope. Not picking a “side” here. Truth and facts only. Again, this is a freaking virus. Why allow the Dems to politicize it? Why fall into their trap? Why should there be “sides” when it comes to a stupid virus? It’s ridculous!


125 posted on 02/23/2023 7:57:28 PM PST by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: CatHerd
Talking to yourself again?

= = = = = =

The fatal flaw in your stratagem, is that you use ad hominem to discredit what you call a "side" (*) while being tactfully reticent about open deliberate, constant, continuous bald-faced lies on the other side as well as the tens of billions of dollars of profit accruing to that side.

And, you go out of your way to attack any studies showing efficacy for non-jab approaches to COVID; and go out of your way to belittle any evidence for widespread harm from the jabs: while exaggerating, and presenting as "typical" of the side, the most click-baity attacks on the jabs, ignoring the rigorous ones.

(*) not just you. Peter Hotez wrote an editorial in Nature attacking what he called the "Disinformation Dozen" (and which he associated with, I'm not kidding, Russia, Russia, Russia. It's *always* the same playbook, and always the same solution: more draconian power)

126 posted on 02/23/2023 8:08:36 PM PST by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

To: CatHerd
Why should there be “sides” when it comes to a stupid virus?

Quite simple to me.

An unnecessary "vaccine" was rushed through at "warp speed" under the pretense it would stop the spread of the new flu (0.5% death rate), which turned out to be a lie, and the carnage per the official government stats is 3 times more deaths resulted from that vaccine than all other vaccines in history, combined.

Verses what, people who are upset about that, and are having to fight to even get their hands on data to review, because the vaccine creators/approvers have tried to hide or destroy it all?

129 posted on 02/23/2023 8:14:08 PM PST by Golden Eagle (The LGBT indoctrination agenda is designed to outlaw the Bible, and anyone who believes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson