Posted on 12/27/2022 6:41:40 AM PST by MtnClimber
Well, here's the medical facts that entirely explain why people with more shots get more covid.
I've been paying attention to this possibility for a while but until the study work came out that proved it all there was is speculation. ADE ("Antibody dependent enhancement") is a fairly poorly-understood thing; most people believe it is confined to making a particular infection more serious than it would otherwise be. Of course having it occur when it otherwise would not fits that quite-nicely, but isn't what people tend to think about.
Now, unfortunately, we have the evidence. Here's the salient graph and lots of discussion which I'll try to recap for you here:
Let me explain this one for you because it makes very clear what's going on. There are multiple sub-types of IgG antibodies. IgG are the last ones that show up; IgA typically is in the mucosa of the nose, and is a "front line" of defense if you will. IgM shows up second; it generally is gone about two weeks or so after you recover. IgG is the "long term" antibody recognition but it has multiple subtypes.
This is very important for human and animal life, because not all things that can elicit a serious immune response should get one. For example: A bee sting. A serious immune response to that could kill you and in people seriously-allergic that's a real risk. So why don't most people get a serious immune response?
As it turns out they sort of do, but its focuses in one sort of IgG build, IgG4, which suppresses the cascade of events that cause the body to go after the thing in question and destroy it, along with all the side effects that produces (fever, serious inflammation, etc.)
Well, when you get Covid typically IgG3 is the one that neutralizes most of the virus. IgG1 and 2 do some of the work, but most of it is done by IgG3. You're not supposed to build an IgG4 response, and with natural infection without vaccination you don't, thus there's no inhibition and your response is and remains effective at neutralizing whatever it is. Typical vaccines (e.g. measles) elicit a response that looks exactly like an actual infection because that's how they're designed and intended; they use the whole virus and their intent is to make your body think it is being invaded by the real deal and respond as it would to the real deal.
SNIP
Remember, IgG4 causes the body to tolerate the infection rather than attack and clear it.
This turns you into a walking virus mutation and production factory, a source of infection to everyone around you and, to the extent that the virus does direct damage to your body systems, and we know the spike does, it also is likely to lead to very severe long-term problems that look like other conditions. Nobody is looking for spike damage specifically in, for example, heart attacks, strokes and pulmonary embolisms, never mind the possibility of potentiating cancer by suppressing immune response if that suppression and tolerance goes beyond Covid, and it very well might. If that's not bad enough everyone that got jabbed has the same profile of response where the normal situation is that responses differ in different people because our body systems operate slightly differently (we're all genetically unique.)
Now who's most-likely to have had the most number of jabs and thus are walking around tolerating infections and giving them others? Health care workers! And who goes to the hospital or doctor? Compromised individuals who can least-withstand infections. Gee, that was smart, right?
What's worse is that we do not know if this is local to Covid or even just coronaviruses. It might not be. We may now have created a couple hundred million people in the US alone who have coded their immune systems to tolerate certain proteins that are common across all manner of respiratory viruses and worse, if its not local to viruses to be more-susceptible to cancer and other immune-sensitive problems with no way to reverse the effects!
At least by early 2021.
Dr Lee Merritt was one of the first to warn.
Here's another early warning article.....from 2/21....
Abstract
Aims of the study: Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.
Methods used to conduct the study: Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.
Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
(Excerpt) Read more at pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ...
Here’s a high level summary of today’s stuff for you.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/booster-caused-immune-tolerance-explains
Article is actually from 2020.
Denis Rancourt did a decent analysis of the all cause mortality data. His opinion is that government meddling is behind most of the spikes in death. Early in the COVID19 outbreak, the government pushed vulnerable elderly who were carrying active COVID19 infections into nursing homes where the close proximity infected staff and residents causing a huge death toll to vulnerable senior citizens. BTW, most of these vulnerable seniors were "shut-ins" with serious vitamin D deficiency.
The second big spike Rancourt sites coincides with the mRNA vaxx rollout and government "equity" policy to push first doses to "vulnerable" elderly and "people of color". Both of those groups preferentially got jabbed ahead of the favored "white oppressors". Surprise! A huge death spike in those groups who "equitably" got jabbed.
Lots of people outside the "favored" groups have been jabbed because they were forced to take the jab to retain employment. The jabbed die mostly in the first 10 days after the jab or 5 months hence. Current studies indicate that an interesting pattern in IgG has emerged in the jabbed. Normal unjabbed persons have IgA on mucous membranes, a short period of IgM to actively fight the infection, then IgG comes on the scene. IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 rise with IgG3 doing most of the work. In the jabbed another form, IgG4 is produced. IgG4 reduces the immune system "fight" against the pathogen. It induces "tolerance". The infection rages on with reduced "symptoms". By jab #3, the IgG3 effective antibody is reduced to trace levels, IgG4 is strongly expressed. The jabbed person is "tolerating" and not fighting the infection.
Another interesting parallel between HIV and SARS-CoV-2 has been observed. Both viruses possess a protein labeled gp120. This protein enables entry into T lyphocytes and subsequently kills them. In this respect both viruses induce an immune system deficiency. The consequence is that opportunistic infections kill the person with the immune system deficiency.
The IgG4 and immuno-suppression from gp120 killing of CD8 lyphocytes may be the reason behind the "triple demic" of SARS-CoV-2/RSV/Flu filling the hospitals. Another daemon making the rounds is Group A Strep infections. Those are killing lots of children.
If there are so many peer reviewed articles that say the vaccine doesn’t provide antibody protection from Covid, why didn’t you just link to one? I would think it would be easy. Any search engine could find them for you.
I posted from the Mayo Clinic.
Sigh
Guess what
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-12-27-cdc-blamed-allowing-liberal-groups-guide-funding.html
Which at the very least shows that it does no good, that it is not working.
It’s just ONE, big grift machine, for these flunkie hacks.....with complete disregard for the well being of the plebes.
Excellent recovery!
:-)
Thanks for the ping. Still praying there will be away out of this. All of my friends and family (save my immediate family) may be at risk.
Does IgG4 serve any positive function in the body?
It seems it prevents over reaction to common exposure to things like bee stings or peanuts.
The data from places that have roughly 50/50 vaxxed shows otherwise. A while back I did some research on state data, particularly GA. The vaxxed and unvaxxed are about 50/50, but as time went on the vaxxed were making up the majority of hospitalizations and eventually the majority of deaths.
I mentioned this to one of my FIL’s hospice nurses and she said that fit with her experience as an ICU nurse - with the difference that she thought the numbers skewed towards the vaxxed even back when they were claiming it was a “pandemic of the unvaxxed”.
Thank you!
I was pretty sure there were earlier discussions, however, this was the earliest post of Geert’s I could find.
That’s odd because I know nursing homes where residents were dying or hospitalized with Covid prior to the vaccine and after the vaccine, they rarely go to the hospital. Covid’s been reduced to a Cold.
The stats are that people die WITH Covid not necessarily FROM Covid. If you die from a heart attack after testing positive for Covid, that’s a Covid death whether it killed you or not so I ignored the stats after the vaccine came out. They were always suspicious.
So what I get from the graph is that taking the clot shot is one big FU, since that repeats eight times on the X axis.
LOL! One of my favorite xkcd strips.
Warning: A year or two ago, I got a book by the author of xkcd (Randall somebody) and he mentioned he was a big Hillary fan.
I was shocked and crestfallen.
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.