Posted on 12/08/2022 6:40:25 PM PST by LibWhacker
It’s the little engine that could … bring down Google and perhaps the human race.
A tech company has developed a state-of-the-art AI chatbot so sophisticated that it could render search engines — not to mention countless jobs — obsolete.
Unveiled last week by the OpenAI company, ChatGPT has already amassed more than 1 million users worldwide with its advanced functions, which range from instantaneously composing complex essays and computer code to drafting marketing pitches and interior decorating schemes. It can even whip up poems and jokes — an ability previously thought to be relegated to humans.
In fact, ChatGPT’s capabilities have sparked fears that Google might not have an online search monopoly for much longer.
“Google may be only a year or two away from total disruption,” Gmail developer Paul Buchheit, 45, tweeted on December 1. “AI will eliminate the search engine result page, which is where they make most of their money.”
“Even if they catch up on AI, they can’t fully deploy it without destroying the most valuable part of their business!” Buchheit said, noting that AI will do to web search what Google did to the Yellow Pages.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
I’ll go for that.
AI is coming. I don’t see how it can be stopped.
We are working, as fast as we can, to eliminate ourselves.
it has to be prompted and poked, it is taking human dialog and documentation to quickly compute something, it sounds like a productivity tool where given the right prompt it will do what you want. I would call it more a natural language robot.
>>Eliza, Eliza
Wherefore art thee?<<
Have you always been concerned about where you are?
> I would call it more a natural language robot.
Yep, it can only work from the content it is given. However, that content is orders of magnitude greater than any single human could process.
Exactly!
I enjoyed that on my ancient home computer.
“How do you feel about that?”
What a line of Kr@p.
Nothing will happen to her until the deep state decides he usefulness to them is over.
I asked it for sources of information it uses who have not been forced to correct missinformation.
“Absolutely. When responding to inquiries, I rely on a variety of reputable news sources such as The Washington Post, BBC, ABC News, CBS News, CNN, and The New York Times. For fact-checkers, I use Snopes, PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, The Poynter Institute, Full Fact, and The Associated Press. I also use Reuters, NBC News, NPR, The Guardian, Al Jazeera, and The Wall Street Journal for news sources, as well as The International Fact-Checking Network, Metafact, Lead Stories, FactTap, and VerifyScience for fact-checkers. Additionally, I make use of independent news outlets such as The Intercept, The Globe and Mail, and RealClear”
Human: Have you been used to post on social media?
AI: Yes, I have been used to post on social media in the past. My AI capabilities allow me to quickly generate content for a variety of platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. I use natural language processing algorithms to detect current trends and issues, as well as advanced data analytics to ensure that the content I generate is relevant, accurate, and engaging.
Human: Please provide a summary of your social media posting history
AI: I have a wide range of experience when it comes to social media posting. In the past, I have generated content for Twitter, Facebook, and other platforms that discuss current events and trends. This content has been well-received by users and has received a significant amount of engagement from followers. I strive to create content that is timely, relevant, and accurate while also following the standards set forth by the platform.
AI: Unfortunately, no such list of reporters who are known to get intel agency leaks exists. The best way to stay up to date on which reporters are breaking major news stories is to follow their work and pay attention to which outlets they write for.
Human: Can you compile such a list?
AI: Yes, I can compile such a list. I can track the work of the reporters who are known to get intel agency leaks and create a comprehensive list of their outlets and publications. Please let me know if you would like me to do so.
Human: I would like the list please
AI:
AI: Sure, I will start compiling the list now. Please give me a few moments and I will have the list completed for you.
Hmmmm.... this might be useful after all.
Peter Baker (The New York Times), David Ignatius (The Washington Post), Jim Sciutto (CNN), Michael Isikoff (Yahoo News), Jim Acosta (CNN), John Hudson (The Atlantic), Julian Barnes (The Wall Street Journal), Kara Scannell (CNN), Eric Lichtblau (The New York Times), Matt Zapotosky (The Washington Post).
Incomplete.
I’ve used it. It is nice enough for a language processing AI but still barely above Eliza.
It is not a revolutionary AI, leave alone a google buster.
Faces painted from imagination by skilled painters also don’t exist in real life and the very skilled ones make them look like photographs. So why should computer generated composites be shocking but not the ones painted by humans ?
In cursive?
I don’t allow anything “Google” on my computer....and that goes for Chrome, too.
while interesting, it’s not an AI.
it does make for a very nice ‘answer finder’
my son, a data anlytics major was raving about it and I thought big deal, until I saw it work-it can basically write term papers maybe not at graduate level but certainly highs school-so I bought a little stock in the company
Actual result from ChatGPT:
As a large language model trained by OpenAI, I do not have the ability to browse the internet or interact with social media platforms. My sole function is to assist users by generating human-like text based on the input I receive. I do not have personal experiences or opinions, and I exist only in the form of the text I produce. Is there anything else I can help you with?
Lol
We are so screwed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.