Posted on 10/20/2022 2:24:19 PM PDT by nickcarraway
The tragedy happened at the Forest Recreation Ground
A talented footballer who collapsed suddenly during a football match in Nottingham is believed to have died a "sudden cardiac death", an inquest heard. Samuel Victor Ovie Akwasi's parents were present when the 13-year-old passed away at the Queen's Medical Centre on May 7 this year.
Miss Mairin Casey, Senior Coroner for Nottinghamshire, opened and adjourned an inquest into the tragic teenager's death at the city's Council House, Old Market Square, on Wednesday, October 19. She read into a recording of the inquest that Samuel was born on September 27, 2008, and sadly died on May 7.
"He was aged just 13 years at the time of his death and he died at the Queen's Medical Centre, she said. A post-mortem examination was conducted, and the provisional cause of death given by a pathologist was "sudden cardiac death with a morphologically normal heart".
The final hearing, where more details will be heard and a conclusion on the cause of death, is set to take place on March 22 next year, and is estimated to take three days.
Two interim hearings are planned, which are pre-inquest reviews, and they are both at 11am on December 7, and February 8 next year. The brief inquest opening comes after Samuel's devastated dad had told of his unending grief after his "legend" son died suddenly, reported Nottinghamshire Live.
Dad Tubman Akwasi said the death of his son is a pain that he has to face everyday. Samuel was playing for FC Cavaliers U13s against WBCY FC Rossoneri, and had scored the first goal of the match before collapsing on the pitch on May 7 at around noon at the Forest Recreation Ground.
Dvarne Edwards, a sports assistant at the Forest Sports Zone, a separate sports facility at The Forest with artificial pitches, had said he "ran over straight away" after he saw the boy collapsed on the grass, near a tree. Mr Edwards explained the boy received treatment and that an ambulance arrived within minutes.
138329069421 Despite all the efforts, Samuel tragically died. He leaves behind his parents, two older siblings and a football team which "loved and respected him". Mr Akwasi, who said that his "life will never be the same without Samuel", added: "He was very talented. He was a legend, our legend."
Samuel's biggest dream was to become a footballer and play for Nottingham Forest one day, his dad recalled. "When Nottingham Forest won at Wembley I cried. He wanted to play for them one day. It is a tragedy that we are facing at the moment as a family. I am heartbroken."
Not from what was reported early.
Tragic either way. Prayers for the family.
If the entire team got the jab, only one fell over and died, so then you have a quantifiable ratio. But if nobody got jabbed, then you still have to find the cause. The question of causation is two-pronged: How many jabbees suddenly die, and how many sudden deaths of otherwise healthy people are of jabbees. And you also have to rule out any other possible causes in each case, such as drug use, bee allergies, etc.
So, are there a lot of people/athletes that we are NOT hearing about that are being saved by CPR?
Or, are those dying immune, now, to such primitive measures?
It would be interesting to note if there has been a shift in deaths versus rescues. This might tell more than the CDC seems willing to.
Didn’t the experts just announce this is true?
Since we know it couldn’t be the experimental vaccines, it must have been something else! Like global warming, lightening, fentanyl, or steroids!
@7 If he was vaxxed - No it didn’t. It may have made him have no symptoms instead of, well no symptoms. Whatever caused the condition, this is very sad. Truly feel for the family.
Buy their own admission the cocktails were not all the same. The pharmaceutical companies experimented on the masses. Different batch numbers had different ingredients. There’s even some evidence that many were placebos. Hence, different outcomes for different recipients.
That’s the old stomping ground of Robin Hood and his band of Merry Men. and his heart-throb Maid Marian.
So what? They followed Fauxi’s lead.
Sorry. My comment was a bad joke. You can’t contract Covid if you’re dead.
We do hope someone is keeping a list of all of these healthy people suddenly dying.
And someone not in the government.
Here is a data-driven response:
A study Sudden Deaths in Young Competitive Athletes-Analysis of 1866 Deaths in the United States, 1980–2006 shows an average of sixty-six (66) deaths per year.
A separate global study, Sudden cardiac death in athletes: the Lausanne Recommendations lists 1101 (1966-2004) reported cases in athletes under 35 years, or an average of 29 per year.
This data set of citizen reports shows 718 (and counting) of such deaths in 2022.
Now, these data are apples and oranges. The peer data averages may be downed-biased because the researchers didn't have Internet search capabilities back then. Also the first study is US only and the Lausanne study is global. Finally, the citizen dataset is not totally homogenous with that of the peer data, most notably on an age basis.
Thus, let's fix what we can - the age difference.
Let's take the citizen dataset, and focus on people 13-25 (the age range with the first study). Through October 15, 2022, I count seven such deaths, Sept 2022-17 , Aug 2022-about 30, July 2022-15, June 2022-22, May 2022-19, April 2022-22, March 2022-44 (that was a tough month), February 2022-17, January 2022-31.
Grand total through Oct 15, 2022 is 224.
If I annualized these 224 deaths through 287 days, I'd get 285 deaths. That's waaaaaay more than the benchmarks. Notwithsndingnthe pros and cons to the data sets, this result should be, for people of good faith, worthy of a "hmmmmm...." and further investigation. Something is up.
Now, let's be honest: these citizen datasets suffer from a lack of consistency in data capture, recording, and processing that the benchmark data possess (though they, as noted, the benchmarks likely suffer from a reporting limitation). It's the same reason why clinical trials are so important in assessing whether or not a shot should graduate to a vaccine. Thus, nobody should do a victory lap with 224 or 287. Indeed, we are taking about young people dying - nobody should be happy.
I am also not going to claim that all of this data are prima facie evidence that the shots are causing these sudden deaths. In fact, I am hoping that the claim that zillions of shot-recipients will be dead in five years turns out to be as wrong as it is sensational.
However, considering the virtual absence of legitimate data capture with consistent recording, data scrubbing, and verification, we drink the dirty water at the oasis in this desert.
The data are compelling - SOMETHING bad is happening to youths.
Let's keep in mind, these shots were granted EUA and weren't subject to proper clinical trials, to assess long-term risks. This is especially worrying because vaccines fail trials 59% of the time and take a median of 9 years.
Thus, we should have little tolerance for bad side effects.
To quote Morgan from WD ‘ these are crazy days’. Cheers
Good post.
@ 33 good comment. Indeed, it is truly vexing that those in authority are not running ‘head-long’ to try to figure out if the covid innoculations are not part of the equation that has led to the statistically significant signals that this started happening in mid 2021.
"I spent four hours on the internet and I couldn't find one single case of a 16-year-old girl's heart just stopping. I spoke to three different doctors and not one of them could tell me exactly what happened to my daughter." The Ring - 2002
Remember intellectual curiosity, and the pursuit of truth?
I have my own well-settled views. But my own personal experience is that I am human AND can get things wrong. So if something like this sudden death syndrome arises, and if it can be tested impirically, I want to test it.
The scientific method is a wonderful thing. It doesn't trump civil rights, i.e. Even if gun ownership was more lethal to good guys than gun control I would STILL favor for civil rights / 2nd Amendment. But honest, fact-based inquiry always wins the day.
This weaponization of pseudo-science as MATH is a great problem, made greater since March 2020. SCIENCE ISNT MATH..
It never was.
And it sure isn't now.
Remember how science said ulcers were induced chiefly by stress or spicy food? It turns out, they are induced chiefly by bacteria. Whoops.
The history of science is littered with "no wait....that's wrong...THIS is right..." going through the rinse and repeat cycle endlessly.
And that's ok. Inquiry and challenge and "being a science heretic" is, in many ways, how mankind learns more and can fix more problems.
But science isn't math. Your checking account balance is the sum of deposits less sum of withdrawals. Always. Forever.
The problem arises when people try to equate science with math...usually they call it "settled science." And, to be sure, robust inquiry and disciplined application of the scientific method usually gives you clear and distinct results. Then, science is settled...until we get new data or better techniques, and then we get "wait a minute..".
For example, there was a most excellent article posted on how "settled science" wasn't so settled, wherein:
seems that Earth has been misplaced. According to a new map of the Milky Way galaxy, the Solar System's position isn't where we thought it was. Not only is it closer to the galactic centre - and the supermassive hole therein, Sagittarius A* - it's orbiting at a faster clip.
It further noted other "errors" in SCIENCE:
A good recent example of this is the red giant star Betelgeuse, which turned out to be closer to Earth than previous measurements suggested. This means that it's neither as large nor as bright as we thought. Another is the object CK Vulpeculae, a star that exploded 350 years ago. It's actually much farther away, which means that the explosion was brighter and more energetic, and requires a new explanation, since previous analyses were performed under the assumption it was relatively low energy
The other problem arises when Certain Powers work overtime to suppress assiduous inquiry. Which, is what we have today as well. It's a bad double whammy.
In the interest of full disclosure, my "science isn't math" quote came from a recent post on social sciences, that featured this brilliant give and take involving a Harvard faculty member critical of Charles Murray from the original article, that is worth reprinting - it is with regard to the "certainty of SCIENCE":
"so why should we let someone teach social science that we know to be wrong in our social science courses?"
Because it is possible that you are wrong.
Science is not mathematics. Newtonian physics was wrong. And social science is a further three rungs down in certainty from science.
Your level of certainty and arrogance about what can be said, and probably thought, smacks of religion, and not science. This is a political religion that permeates academia at the moment. And which I am fairly sure you will swear does not infect you, while the rest of us can see the symptoms quite plainly.
Only religions ban heretics from speaking because of the wrong-think they might cause. Real science loves a good heretic. In In fact, honestly, the entire goal of science is to be a heretic. To have an idea that no other person ever had. Science is the pretty much the antithesis of your thought-police approach.
And most of academia used to be the antithesis of your thought police approach as well, until the religion of leftism took it over, with the direct help of people like you.
Please note - per Renfrew, "Newtonian physics wasn’t wrong, but it was incomplete. That is an important distinction. Newton’s calculations worked fine (and still do) 99% of the time, but over time we found more an more exceptions. Almost all of those exceptions were cleaned up by Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity, but we still have other exceptions that prove those theories are not complete."
Yeah, this is the first case in History where a healthy appearing person suddenly dropped dead. Never happened before. All those ridiculous medical statements about the first sign of heart problems in 25% of heart cases is sudden death is just made up medical talk by cardiology specialists. Much better to believe the kooks on the internet, especially if they have an unhinged belief or bias.
So he died of a sudden cardiac death on the field but then later died at the medical center? Who is writing these articles? Morons?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.