Posted on 08/04/2022 4:46:51 AM PDT by Chickensoup
You expected that voting would change America without doing the hard work of securing VOTER ID and requiring all votes be legally verified and cast only by citizens? And ridding the country of RANK CHOICE VOTING. You expected to win when leftist extremists rigged the system AND YOU DID NOTHING BUT WHINE!
Watch out...
The Dominion Fan Club will be here shortly to burn your house down.
Tell that to the people in the Capital jail.
You want to be a John Brown? Go ahead. You first.
I can tell you are angry as well, but what did you personally do, Chickensoup?
Did you get involved with your town politics or anything like that? Just curious.
1. Voter ID with proof of U.S. Citizenship
2. In Person voting only, one Election Day, no exceptions
3. Fingerprint required on every ballot.
4. Paper ballots only, watermarked and retained.
November 8 will determine if this is the last election where the American people decide things at the ballot box. If they steal it again, the next “election” will be with the other type of box. They know it, we know, and they know that we know it.
For this reason, I expect a huge October surprise by the evil Biden regime to take place. They will start WW3 to prevent losing power. It will not work. Their days are numbered.
Projecting?
CODE CRACKED ON ELECTION THEFT (Hostage Vanity From Nick Moseder)
Nick Moseder on Rumble ^ | August 4, 2022 | Nick Mosedee via Hostage
Posted on 8/4/2022, 4:49:04 AM by Hostage
12 minute video:
https://rumble.com/v1eo1ec-huge-counterfeit-ballots-being-injected-nationwide.html
Nick’s video outlines the elements of the steal. Whoever masterminded this was clever and very smart, but not completely.
Long short:
1. A voter marks choices on a paper ballot, not knowing the ballot’s calibration marks are deliberately off.
2. (Some) The paper ballots are therefore defective, and when scanned are diverted to a folder of rejected image files.
3. Replacement ballots with proper calibration marks are printed to match the rejected ballots and are rescanned successfully.
4. The voter markings of rejected ballots are ‘partially’ copied over to the replacement ballots.
The above steps allow for a particular candidate’s votes to be altered while preserving down ballot totals.
Note in passing:
Nick mentions Heidar Garcia from Tarrant County, Texas. Garcia is elections administrator for Tarrant County. Garcia is a native Venezuelan who came from Panama where he worked 12 years for Smartmatic. Smartmatic is ultimately owned by Soros.
Thank you very much and God bless you.
-————_——————_—————————
This is posted for further development.
The content gets moderately technical for those that are trained, highly technical for the untrained. Can’t fix gap in understanding yet without schematics, cartoons, everyday analogies.
But expect Nick Moseder, in concert with former Law Professor David Clements and his wife Erin (Erin is an engineer and is off the scales sharp), will in days ahead, perfect the mass media presentation to inform all Americans who are living day to day in a concerned state about our compromised, subverted election systems.
I will leave here a personal knowledge nugget. Each pdf printed paper has ‘microcode’ printed with it that has information regarding printer, print time, location, and other details. It requires special equipment to read the microcode.
I assert a reason that access is blocked to paper and image ballots for audits is that the embedded microcode will not match with scanned information.
Not just RCV.
RCV-enabled voting machines gotta go, too...
1. Yes.
2. There are legitimate reasons for absentee voting, such as military service. Absentee voting should require the reason to be stated and verified. No more early voting at all. No ballot harvesting.
3. Requiring a fingerprint on each ballot would not be compatible with the concept of the secret ballot. Instead, to receive a ballot each voter should sign and fingerprint the voter list. (Signatures should be in pen, on paper. No more of the touch screens. If they want an electronic record of signatures, take a photograph.)
4. Yes.
What is the problem with rank choice voting?
Laws requiring ALL elections ballots & records are already on the books:
MUST be retained for 22 months.
Many states just did as they pleased...epecially Colorado.
VERY difficult to audit.
I agree with everything except fingerprint on the ballot- it eliminates the possibility of a secret ballot.
It is clear ballots probably DO have fingerprints, but making it mandatory would not be kosher.
WRONG!
And it is mandatory by law...
Rank choice is where you pick your first, second, and third choice on one ballot.
That would be hard to manage without computers. I am against computers being used THE WAY THEY ARE now.
I write computer software for a living. I am qualified to be an expert witness in court. I could design a system that would be simple, open to inspection, and auditable.
The dominion systems they use now are the opposite of that. They claim to have ‘proprietary’ software so they can’t reveal the code. THIS IS WRONG. What is proprietary about adding +1 to a column when you get a vote?
What is proprietary is their method to conceal vote fraud.
Lemme check. Ok I checked. I'm not a legislator.
Yes I did. It is a leftist nest. But I did.
But you can organize and have power to help elect the people who can change the laws.
I’d be good proudly flaunting a purple ink stain on my pinky finger for a few weeks as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.