Posted on 07/18/2022 9:03:25 AM PDT by Red Badger
Bent alkyne (left), diradical (center) and cyclobutadiene molecules under atomic force microscopy. (Leo Gross/IBM)
If chemists built cars, they'd fill a factory with car parts, set it on fire, and sift from the ashes pieces that now looked vaguely car-like.
When you're dealing with car-parts the size of atoms, this is a perfectly reasonable process. Yet chemists yearn for ways to reduce the waste and make reactions far more precise.
Chemical engineering has taken a step forward, with researchers from the University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain, the University of Regensburg in Germany, and IBM Research Europe forcing a single molecule to undergo a series of transformations with a tiny nudge of voltage.
Ordinarily, chemists gain precision over reactions by tweaking parameters such as the pH, adding or removing available proton donors to manage the way molecules might share or swap electrons to form their bonds.
"By these means, however, the reaction conditions are altered to such a degree that the basic mechanisms governing selectivity often remain elusive," the researchers note in their report, published in the journal Science.
In other words, the complexity of forces at work pushing and pulling across a large organic molecule can make it hard to get a precise measure on what's occurring at each and every bond.
The team started with a substance called 5,6,11,12-tetrachlorotetracene (with the formula C18H8Cl4) – a carbon-based molecule that looks like a row of four honeycomb cells flanked by four chlorine atoms hovering around like hungry bees.
Sticking a thin layer of the material to a cold, salt-crusted piece of copper, the researchers drove the chlorine-bees away, leaving a handful of excitable carbon atoms holding onto unpaired electrons in a range of related structures.
Diagram of isomers reconfigured by stm
A single molecule reconfigured into isomers (Alabugin & Hu, Science, 2022)
Two of those electrons in some of the structures happily reconnected with each other, reconfiguring the molecule's general honeycomb shape. The second pair were also keen to pair up not just with each other, but with any other available electron that might buzz their way.
Ordinarily, this wobbly structure would be short-lived as the remaining electrons married up with each other as well. But the researchers found this particular system wasn't an ordinary one.
With a gentle push of voltage from an atom-sized cattle prod, they showed they could force a single molecule to connect that second pair of electrons in such a fashion that the four cells were pulled out of alignment in what's known as a bent alkyne.
Shaken a little less vigorously, those electrons paired up differently, distorting the structure in a completely different fashion into what's known as a cyclobutadiene ring.
Each product was then reformed back into the original state with a pulse of electrons, ready to flip again at a moment's prompting.
By forcing a single molecule to contort into different shapes, or isomers, using precise voltages and currents, the researchers could gain insight into the behaviors of its electrons and the stability and preferable configurations of organic compounds.
From there it could be possible to whittle down the search for catalysts that could push a large-scale reaction of countless molecules in one direction, making the reaction more specific.
Previous studies have used similar methods to visualize the reconfigurations of individual molecules, and even manipulate individual steps of a chemical reaction. Now we are building new methods for tweaking the very bonds of molecules to form isomers that ordinarily wouldn't be so simple to swap around.
Not only does research like this help make chemistry more precise, it provides engineers with sharp new tools to manufacture machines on a nanoscale, warping carbon-frameworks into exotic shapes that wouldn't be possible with ordinary chemistry.
This research was published in Science.
We’re definitely showing our age LOL
Yes, but it involves Supernovas, so it’s not yet obtainable..................
That does seem to be main road block for all things transformational.
The amount of energy required is always impractical.
For now.....................
Usually this inefficiency yields junk side products that have to be removed. Another possibility is that an optical isomer formed. An optical isomer is the exact chemical composition as the desired product but reversed like looking in a mirror. Think right hand and left hand. The same but different. An optical isomer can be difficult if not impossible to purify from its opposite. I’ve only personally encountered this scenario one time in a highly expensive pharmaceutical production process.
A step towards replicators to make anything including replicators.
Yes, I’ve heard of that.................I wonder if their properties are ‘opposite’?.....could be useful....................
I only personally encountered this one time in a manufacturing process. This was in a batch crystallization reactor that produced a high value pharmaceutical product. All the reactants plus a solvent were dumped into the reactor at once then then the crystallization ran its course over something like 20 hours. At the end of 20 hours, the reactor was shut down, emptied, the crystals harvested and purified then pressed into prescription tablets.
The L and R optical isomers had identical physical properties so could not be separated via a purification step downstream of the reactor. Only one isomer was active for the therapeutic effect. So, too much of the opposite isomer would throw the reactor batch off spec and the entire batch junked.
Two things were happening at the same time in the reactor. First you had a chemical reaction that produced the product molecule from the feed products. This occurred in solution (A + B —> Product). The second action occurring was a physical change, i.e. crystallization.
It was during the crystallization that the L and R physical properties were created. The work I was doing was to increase the yield of the active isomer. An unexpected development is that I found that the batch time could be reduced by about 30% while increasing the ratio of the good isomer vs the undesirable isomer. Double win!
It was frustrating but due to extreme conservatism by FDA certifications, it took about 5 years to recertify the regulated process with the control technique I developed. Frustrating, yes. Necessary, double yes.
Note a hot take hidden in that last paragraph. About 5 years for a process certification via normal FDA quality control steps. Compare this to the fast track emergency authorization for the Covid “vaccines”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
