Posted on 06/17/2022 11:20:31 AM PDT by ShadowAce
Are you a newcomer to Linux? Not sure which Linux distribution to choose to begin your Linux journey? This article is for you!
For the average PC user who has been using the established desktop operating systems such as Microsoft Windows and macOS, Linux can be somewhat confusing. Furthermore, the perception that Linux is mainly used by “pro” users and is “very complex” plays against it.
Of course, neither of the preceding two statements is true. Linux is a complex operating system, just like any other. And, as always, it all depends on the individual.
We’re all accustomed to working in our comfort zones. So when we have to step out of it, the new and unfamiliar might be intimidating and incomprehensible. And that’s perfectly normal.
Why am I saying the above? Because it is critical to take the proper approach while encountering the unfamiliar, in this case, Linux. Our early impressions are often decisive for our future attitude toward the object of our work.
The fact that a new Linux user is faced with the surprising discovery that there are “many kinds of Linux” is confusing enough. And the first question is almost always, “Which Linux distribution should I choose?”
I’ll divide novice Linux users into three categories in the following lines. Then, based on my experience over the years, I will recommend a specific Linux distribution for each.
Of course, this is all my opinion. I do not claim that this is the only proper course to follow. Furthermore, the internet is filled with articles titled “Best Linux distributions for…”, so here are my thoughts on the subject.
But of course, I’d appreciate it if you took my advice into account while choosing a Linux distribution with which to enter the exciting world of freedom, Linux.
Before we get to the proposals, let me share the criteria that guided my decision.
First and foremost, the Linux distribution should be one of the original ones. If you’re new to Linux, these are the ones that were created from scratch and aren’t based on anything else before them.
But don’t get me wrong. I’m not against derivatives that “improve” the original. I don’t even mind derivatives of derivatives that fix “improvements” to the derivative before them.
However, each of these Linux distributions modifies the original concept to varying degrees. Some have an impact on core functionality, while others have an impact on appearance – others on both sides.
All of this, in some manner, deviates from the path of pure Linux user experience. I believe the foundation should be placed as close to the roots as possible. This will give a novice Linux user a more accurate understanding and feel for everything that follows.
Furthermore, the distribution’s primary desktop environment should be GNOME or KDE. These two desktop environments, loved by some and disliked by others, are the most widely used in the Linux world.
Therefore, it is strongly advised that the first steps into Linux involve getting to know one of the two.
Of course, as knowledge and experience grow, the new Linux user will probably find the most enjoyable part of this operating system – the plethora of desktop environments. And at some point will walk its way through them all.
Finally, there are two significant criteria to consider: reliability and support. I agree that most modern Linux distributions are reliable these days. But we need to go one step beyond that here.
We should bet on those that have proven to be the least prone to official releases containing bugs. And even if they do occur, having the capacity and capability to intervene lightning-fast and deliver a fix in the shortest amount of time.
In other words, the new Linux user can get a reliable and stable operating system without even knowing it. Otherwise, it would play a rather frustrating role.
I realize the title sounds strange, but let me explain. Not every Linux user became one out of pure curiosity, love of technology, or belief in the open-source philosophy.
Some people work with Linux by coincidence in a work context without having any enthusiasm to do so without previous experience. Others choose Linux simply because Linux skills are highly valued.
Whatever the case, these users need an “entry point” into learning about Linux, and I recommend Fedora.
Some of you would automatically say “Ubuntu” out of habit. However, based on my experiences, Ubuntu is no longer the best choice for new Linux users.
The distribution has implemented a lot of controversial decisions and approaches in its recent releases, which does not fit my definition of a clean and straightforward Linux experience.
On the other hand, Fedora provides one of the cleanest user experiences. The distribution becomes better, more polished, and easier to use with each release.
You won’t find pre-modified and “powdered” desktop embellishments in Fedora, which sometimes change the desktop environment beyond recognition. Instead, the new user is presented with a clean Linux desktop that is as near to the original Linux experience as possible.
At the same time, the software is up to date and has been thoroughly tested for stability, ensuring trouble-free operation.
Everything in Fedora works right out of the box, making the newbie Linux user’s first steps into Linux much more effortless.
Furthermore, Fedora is a member of the Red Hat family. Using it as a starting point in the Linux world, you are guaranteed to build solid knowledge while dealing with enterprise Linux systems over time. Something that can only benefit your future Linux development.
We are moving on to the second group of novice Linux users. Most of them belong to it – people passionate about technology, freedom, and the right to choose.
This group of future Linux users is aware that they are facing something unfamiliar, but they believe they can handle it. So I recommend Debian to them.
As we know, Debian is a universal Linux distribution. This means that besides being a server, it does great on the desktop. And just like Fedora, Debian comes with an excellent graphical installer that wouldn’t be difficult for most computer users.
Installing the most recent version of the distribution provides the newbie Linux user with one of the most robust desktop solutions available. Yes, the packages are not “at the bleeding edge.” However, I doubt the novice Linux user will be in tears because they did not get GNOME 42 or KDE Plasma 5.25.
We’re back to the idea of the pure Linux user experience. It is abundant here. Debian strictly adheres to Linux standards and will give the novice Linux user one of the most solid foundations of knowledge.
On top of that, Debian is free of surprises and strange decisions forced by business interests. Everything here is about reliability, stability, and keeping to the Linux philosophy.
The novice user will gain fundamental knowledge and skills about a large part of the Linux ecosystem by joining it through Debian. By knowing about Debian, a Linux user is learning about everything that has emerged from it, and the list is extensive. But, of course, Ubuntu is at the helm.
Debian is like your childhood best friend, with whom you discovered your life’s adventures. Years later, you return to it after traveling many roads in the Linux world and trying countless distributions.
And you find that your best friend hasn’t changed that much. Still reliable and stable, eager to help you. Years pass, but some things have stood the test of time. A symbol of reliability and stability. This best suits Debian.
And last but not least, Debian will introduce new Linux users to the concept of open source as closely as possible.
Here we stand on the cliff’s edge and dive boldly into the deep. But when we surface, we will be many steps ahead of the others.
“Arch Linux” and “new Linux user” are two phrases many people find challenging to put together in the same sentence. But, on the other hand, many believe that to study something thoroughly, you must first get your hands dirty up to your elbows. And that statement makes sense.
Of course, we must make one clarification here. Choosing Arch Linux as a first introduction to Linux is only for highly motivated people. For individuals who see failure as an opportunity to learn another way, things should not be done and move on to the next effort.
So, gaining experience and knowledge about the Linux ecosystem is the fastest and most generous with Arch Linux, but it comes at a price.
It needs a lot of motivation and dedication to the Linux concept. Long hours are often required for something that appears to work by default in other Linux distributions. But at the end of the day, you will have a thorough understanding of how things work.
In fact, things aren’t too terrible. Once you’ve accomplished the manual installation in the terminal, you’ll discover that you’ve learned more about Linux in a few hours than you would have in weeks of reading about it.
And then, you will be able to repeat the entire process in exactly 30 minutes. But the best part is that things will get easier.
Despite being a rolling-release Linux distro, Arch is incredibly stable and reliable. Did I mention that it would be difficult to find software for Linux that isn’t already in one of the Arch repositories? Everything is at your disposal. I mean, everything.
In addition, the Arch Linux documentation can be summed up in one word: treasure. It is not restricted to the distro alone. It’s a one-stop shop for almost any Linux user looking for information about certain system functionality.
Almost everything on Arch Linux is done manually using the command line. As a result, it will provide the novice Linux user with a jolt of pure Linux experience, understanding, and knowledge. This would take much longer with most other Linux distributions.
So if you’re highly motivated and don’t give up easily, go ahead! Dive into the deep because Arch Linux is for you. The payoff is worth it!
We’ve reached the end of this article, and I’d like to share a few final thoughts.
The proposed Linux distributions are based on a few core criteria: adherence to the basic principle of Linux, stability, reliability, support, and the desktop environment used.
Of course, many other distros are vying for the niche of the most user-friendly Linux distro for beginners. For example, Deepin, elementary OS, Zorin OS, Linux Mint, etc., offer gorgeous desktop environments. Shiny, polished almost to the last detail.
In addition, many of them are trying to work on a next-next-install principle. But that’s not the sort of thing I’d like to advice a new Linux user to use. Don’t get me wrong, but if I wanted something shiny and easy, I’d just go to the local PC store and buy a MacBook Pro.
Linux has always been and will continue to be more than just an operating system. From its first days 30 years ago, it has been far beyond that. Linux is the last technological romance of our time. It is an idea, a community, a philosophy, a belief, freedom, and faith all rolled into one.
As a result, the recommendations in this article stick to distributions near to these understandings. Distros that will give the new Linux user a pure and unadulterated with extra spices feel and embellishment of this adventure we all love, called Linux.
Whether you agree or disagree with my point of view, I want to thank you for your time and the pleasure of being our reader. Any feedback is much appreciated!
I’ve been to Kauai for 10 days. Just loved it. Best vacation ever. But I’ll not fly again:-( Me and TSA don’t get along. I get picked almost every time for a pat down. They do their best to separate the owner from their luggage/personal belongings. Too big of hassle. I love flying but not the airport hassle.
Good Hunting... from Varmint Al
I don’t think I could disagree with this author more. Arch linux? For a linux beginner? Only if you hate your life. If you have to use Arch, then Manjaro for beginners. Debian for beginners? Not unless you want them to back to Windoze.
Kubuntu or Linux Mint are the easiest to transition from Windoze. Maybe ElementaryOS.
Yep... Mint is running away with the Linux concept as the best so all these articles avoid it and try to promote the others lagging behind. :)
I had my wife (a Windows user from the time of Win3.1 onward) using Ubuntu Linux for a year. If she hadn't started using a craft vinyl cutting machine requiring the use of Windows-only closed-source software, she wouldn't have gone back.
Yeah, I’ve been using it almost that long. Back then, the kernel panic messages said “call Linus.” I think it had his phone number, too...
Mint Cinnamon quickly convinced me that the bad old days of Linux were over.
Well, I don’t know much about the Linux options in general, but we don’t do anything complex. For this average home-user, Mint is fine.
Except for compatibility with some items that work off of MS software, like sewing and other craft machines, I haven’t needed anything that Mint can’t handle. (And I think some of those are being offered that work with Linux, too, now.)
Linux is like a rottweiler, it can smell fear. So put on your big boy pants, snarl back at it (like you mean it), learn some elementary command line and show it who’s boss, else it’ll bite off your wedding tackle.
LOL! I’ll remember that, if I ever have reason to get rough with it.
“Except for compatibility with some items that work off of MS software, like sewing and other craft machines, I haven’t needed anything that Mint can’t handle. (And I think some of those are being offered that work with Linux, too, now.”
Even the models you have now may have new Linux software available as of recent. A dig through the manufacturers support may find these for you. :)
For the average new Linux user not familiar with Linux Mint is the best. I have tried them all and stick with Mint myself as the easiest and most stable to use.
Thanks, I’ll remember that. I haven’t even chosen a machine yet, but I’ve been wanting one of those ‘Cricut’ types of gadget.
Those screen prints sure looked end user friendly to me. /sarc
Back then we had built a machine using an EISA board and numerous “expermental” I/O cards. I think we had 16 of the biggest drives of the day in that thing. It may have been one of the first “servers” around. I recall some salesman from IBM showing up and telling us we needed his $750,000 RISC machine. We took him back to the thing we had built (named Frankenstein) and he laughed when he saw this thing with multiple boxes and ribbon cables all over with a spot cooler blowing cold air into the boxes (only way to keep it running). He said, “that won’t work*”. He stopped laughing when we started doing things on the console and told him everything cost less than 10% the cost of his machines, he wanted us to buy. He mumbled something and left; we never saw him again.
*I’ve never really paid much attention to people who said I could not do this or that.
Where is the picture of the cpu in an aquarium for a case that used to get posted to this sort of thread.
20 years ago people were making all sorts of things. Very Few now
Even 25 or 30 years ago, software creators were a lot more clever and creative than they are now.
“Mint Cinnamon quickly convinced me that the bad old days of Linux were over. “
Yep... My first thoughts were “This is almost Win 7!”
Yes!
Thank you! The things I’ve wanted to do are designed by freelancers for the machines; so I’ll check and see that they’ll work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.