[Paladin2]

Just get the chip......

[RatRipper]

Doesn’t our Constitution require 2/3 on treaties? I don’t think they will be able to ram this down our throats like that.

[Skywise]

Tell me this isn’t hand in hand with the WEF’s plans for world domination.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

First, we kill all the bureaucrats.

Apologies to William Shakespeare.

[Roman_War_Criminal]

“This system will be universal, mandatory, trans-national, and operated by unelected bureaucrats”

Mandatory?
Yeah?

or else what?

[Terry L Smith]

the answer is ‘no’, however you wizh to say that!

i say it now ... any and all congresscritters that say ‘yea’ to this WHO thing, through some other American citizen, I can’t I’m disabled and tied to a darn kidney machine, just might not see their second next birthday.

[Libloather]

Doesn’t Commiecare cover this?

[laplata]

Look at this short clip from Davos:

https://rumble.com/v15xyhm-alibaba-group-pres-were-working-on-a-carbon-footprint-tracker-to-monitor-wh.html?mref=ah9c7&mc=cfcoh

[jimwatx]

Any Republicans voting for this need to be targeted for removal.

[discostu]

It took us 20 years to get RealID in place. Not terribly concerned about new ID “requirements”.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Unless and until such a treaty is ratified by the U.S., it is not binding. Even then, it likely would require additional implementing language to be fully enforceable, and even then, parts likely would be unconstitutional. Not really worried about this one.

[umbagi]

No.

[sergeantdave]

A treaty can’t be amended without senate approval.

Period.

[unlearner]

There will be politicians who support this but who also oppose requiring any identification for voting.

[joshua c]

tied? it the whole point of the treaty

[joshua c]

lets say US does not comply but quite a few countries do.

Americans would have to have the digital passport to travel or business has to be in compliance to do business with those countries

[ptsal]

Bkmk