[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Unless and until such a treaty is ratified by the U.S., it is not binding. Even then, it likely would require additional implementing language to be fully enforceable, and even then, parts likely would be unconstitutional. Not really worried about this one.

[Signalman]

“It is much worse than we thought. The rule change includes very dangerous amendments – 13 of them. Investigative reporter Leo Hohmann reports that these amendments will NOT require approval by 2/3 of the United States Senate. It’s not called a treaty. It’s amending a treaty we are a part of.”

https://www.independentsentinel.com/the-who-plans-to-strip-194-nations-and-the-us-of-sovereignty-may-22/