Posted on 03/30/2022 9:27:39 AM PDT by Red Badger
Nearby stars appearing red in a sky survey image. (SDSS)
From billions of light-years across the vast gulf of space-time, from the very dawn of the Universe, astronomers have detected the light of a single star.
Its discoverers have nicknamed it Earendel, from the Anglo-Saxon word meaning "morning star"; to date, it is the most distant object of its kind ever detected, dating to just 900 million years after the Big Bang.
Because Earendel's light has traveled so far to reach us, its properties are difficult to discern, but follow-up observations have already been approved for the James Webb Space Telescope.
The first billion years of the Universe's history following the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago, also known as the Cosmic Dawn, are very difficult to see. Not only is it murky and dark very early, when the first stars and galaxies form, it's also extremely distant. Even finding quasars, the brightest objects in the Universe, stretches the capabilities of our technology and analysis techniques.
But there's a quirk of gravity that can show us small, distant things that might otherwise be beyond our reach. It's called gravitational lensing, and it has to do with the gravitational curvature of space-time around massive objects, such as galaxies and galaxy clusters.
If a massive object is at exactly the right place between us and a more distant object, light from that distant object will travel along the gravitational space-time curvature. This has the effect of an absolutely enormous magnifying glass: The light from the distant object may be smeared and distorted, but it's also magnified and often duplicated.
gravitational lensing Diagram illustrating gravitational lensing. (NASA, ESA & L. Calçada)
Astronomers can then reverse-engineer the light to figure out what the magnified object was. At the distance of the Cosmic Dawn, these smears usually turn out to be galaxies.
The home galaxy of Earendel, whose real name is the rather less pretty WHL0137-LS, was first picked up by the Hubble Space Telescope as just such a smear, magnified by a massive galaxy cluster. There, within the galaxy, a team led by astrophysicist Brian Welch of Johns Hopkins University found a single bright object sitting right on top of the lensing critical curve.
When we see bright single objects in other galaxies, they tend to be something much brighter than a typical star; but anything much brighter than a typical star also tends to be fleeting, like a nova, or a tidal disruption event around a black hole.
Across 3.5 years of observations, Earendel's brightness did not change. This, coupled with its location, suggested that it's not transient, but a bright star in the right place at the right time.
We know how far away it is, because of how stretched the light is. The expansion of the Universe causes light waves to attenuate, a property known as redshifting. Astronomers estimate the distance of early Universe objects based on the redshift of the light.
An analysis of the UV light from Earendel suggested the object is around 50 times the mass of the Sun. But more detail than that is too difficult to tease out from the available data. We don't know the spectral classification of the star, for instance, which would be useful.
We have seen some very ancient stars that have survived billions of years, but more massive stars tend to die younger, so knowing what type of star it is would elucidate the Universe's early evolution just a smidge.
We don't even know if it is one lone star, or a binary with a combined mass of around 50 solar masses. In the latter case, however, known massive binaries usually consist of one much more massive star that is emitting most of the system's light, and the team expects that would also be the case with Earendel.
The earliest star ever spotted could tell us some interesting things about the early Universe. We haven't, for instance, been able to observe the processes that led to light being able to stream freely throughout the Universe, known as Reionization. Astronomers believe stars and galaxies were behind it, but have no direct observations of how it unfolded.
We've seen galaxies in the Cosmic Dawn. Narrowing our understanding down to the types of individual stars that were around at the time would be very interesting indeed.
Time has been approved for Webb to take spectroscopic observations of Earendel, which Welch and his colleagues hope will reveal more information about the star, including its age, classification, a more detailed mass, and whether or not it's a binary system.
The research has been published in Nature.
Ping!...................
Scientists nicknamed it Earendel, from the Anglo-Saxon word meaning “morning star”
How utterly Euro-centric and racist of those oppressive, unawake scientists.
“...900 million years after the Big Bang...”
Not 901 million years or 899 million years. No it’s exactly 900 million years.
And we have 8 more years before the planet is destroyed by the combustion engine and Piltdown Man.
It’s called the Pelosi star
Tolkien also availed himself of the name. :^) Thanks RB.
Biden Star............. It’s so old nobody can see it................
When you wish upon a star...that star has been dead for a millions years. Like your dreams.
The actual measured redshift of the Balmer line from the Nature paper was 6.2 ± 0.1. This means that at the time the light left the star all the objects in the universe were about 6.2 times closer together with a 10% error. The time estimate should be 900 million years with a 10% error (890 - 990 million years) after the Big Bang. Good catch.
That’s the Disney Theme song..................
I think I’ll look for an unabridged audiobook of LOTR, those are great for the commute and other riding time.
http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Song_of_E%C3%A4rendil
Bwahahahaha!
In the meantime we are being treated to the gentle ministrations of Verbal Beatdown Karen.
Thanks, good to get a recommendation, the titles on Amazon have some consistent problems in the critical reviews.
Is it just Rob, or is it a dramatization “full cast” recording? The way Amazon links its reviews is like old people do the nasty.
Does that make us nerds if we automatically knew the name was a Tolkien character?
Oh, I don’t think there was any risk that we wouldn’t be considered nerds anyway. ;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.