Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LOL: Feminist Group’s Logo Taken Down For Hilarious Reason – You Have To See It To Believe It [Australia]
https://thebluestateconservative.com ^ | March 15, 2022 | by Hailey Sanibel

Posted on 03/15/2022 9:10:41 AM PDT by Red Badger

Some things you simply cannot make up. If the Babylon Bee had produced a logo for a dyed-in-the-wool feminist organization and meant to subvert it, it could not have a done a better job.

More than not being able to make it up, you have to wonder how this logo passed through each of the requisite stages for approval. Who ideated this? Who designed it? Who signed off on it? Who in the organization voted in favor? How did, at each step of the way, no one notice what we all see immediately.

Take a look for yourself. What do you see?

Haha. Nothing else needs to be said. Again, how does this happen? No matter – we should just be glad it did.

An Australian news outlet covered the story. They led with this unmistakably honest assessment:

“The logo for the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s (PM&C) “Women’s Network” has been taken down, after it was mocked on social media for its phallic appearance…

Many at first assumed the logo was a fake because of its overt resemblance to male genitalia, while others were furious that it detracted from the actual purpose of the Network.”

Phallic is an understatement. Not only in a phallus clearly present, the logo includes the full range of external male genitalia. Like I said, you couldn’t make this up if you tried to mock woke losers.

The report was also quick to note that many assumed it was a joke, which seems like an obvious analysis. As we asked, a litany of questions requiring confounding answers needed to be stupidly ingored for this hilarioius logo to move from concept to publication.

The article then reminds readers that the Australian government isn’t new to idiotic woke controversies. I hadn’t seen this ad before – maybe readers have – but it equally misses the mark in its own way. The embedded video below features some bizarre analogy from drinking milkshakes with a date as a way of introducing respectful, consensual sexual practices into the public narrative. Needless to say, it didn’t go over well nor succeed. Like the logo for feminists, this ad was also pulled.

If you don’t want to watch the video, the same news outlet described it this way:

“The taxpayer-funded “milkshake” ad on sexual consent that has been slammed as a dangerous waste of money has been removed from the $3.7 million campaign following a fierce public backlash.

News.com.au revealed on Monday that rape prevention campaigners have raised serious concerns over the Morrison government’s “confusing” new consent education campaign for schools featuring bizarre videos of a woman smearing a man’s face with a milkshake.”

These people never learn.


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Business/Economy; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: australia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 03/15/2022 9:10:41 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That would work for some of the trans swimmers...


2 posted on 03/15/2022 9:14:02 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.for corruptiion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I saw tits.

I guess I’m slow.


3 posted on 03/15/2022 9:15:59 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Ukraine is not a good country and does not deserve active US support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I only saw boobs.


4 posted on 03/15/2022 9:16:56 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Somewhere there’s a graphic designer, cashing a check and laughing so hard they can barely stand up


5 posted on 03/15/2022 9:18:03 AM PDT by The Louiswu (The times they are a changin. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Saw it right off the bat but I have goats who gonads are one in front of the other so ...


6 posted on 03/15/2022 9:19:37 AM PDT by Pollard (PureBlood -- https://youtube.com/watch?v=VXm0fkDituE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I see what they are saying now that Ive read the article but at first I saw something more similar to what you saw...

"Tits on lithium"

7 posted on 03/15/2022 9:24:17 AM PDT by gnarledmaw (Hive minded liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives elect servants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; SomeCallMeTim

I saw what you saw.

I guess I can understand the other interpretation but it doesn’t seem quite proportional, but what the hell do I know...


8 posted on 03/15/2022 9:26:20 AM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Someone has a wicked sense of humor...


9 posted on 03/15/2022 9:29:37 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Fifteen days to slow the curve! Just fifteen days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; 100American; al baby; Allegra; BufordP; DoodleBob; EveningStar; Gefn; GunsareOK; ...

I suppose if a woman smears an attacker’s face with a lead milkshake, that’s OK.

As for the logo, it’s not even flattering. The phallus is short and the other things look kinda saggy.

DANG!


10 posted on 03/15/2022 9:30:21 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Florida: America's new free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Rumor has it, it was modeled after a rubber dildo. Who would have thunk it?


11 posted on 03/15/2022 9:31:58 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (Let's go Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

that has got to be a joke.


12 posted on 03/15/2022 9:33:04 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Someone from the Bezos school of design?


13 posted on 03/15/2022 9:33:32 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
It's, er, what now?

The logo for the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s (PM&C) “Women’s Network”...

Oooo...kaaaay... I have to suspect that at least one level of management passed the thing up snickering.

14 posted on 03/15/2022 9:35:10 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Frank and beans!...


15 posted on 03/15/2022 9:36:17 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just goes to show that even the hard core feminazi’s can’t stop thinking about it. Even when they aren’t thinking about it. lol


16 posted on 03/15/2022 9:36:57 AM PDT by j_guru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

“Have you seen my baseball?”


17 posted on 03/15/2022 9:36:59 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Taxpayer funded, I presume. My guess is several thousand Aus Dollars to some artist or designer to come up with that one and probably on the taxpayer’s dime.
Boy Howdy! Them taxpayers will buy anything.


18 posted on 03/15/2022 9:37:54 AM PDT by Tupelo (“Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*ck things up” (Barack Obama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I am seeing a tampon. One of the organic, tubeless ones.


19 posted on 03/15/2022 9:41:05 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

I saw boobs. Then again I don’t actively go around looking for phallic symbols.


20 posted on 03/15/2022 9:45:04 AM PDT by Do_Tar (To my NSA handler: I have an alibi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson