Posted on 03/08/2022 12:26:43 PM PST by frithguild
https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-man-who-sold-ukraine/which FR will not allow to be posted.
Pukin is gonna do what he’s gonna do no matter what the “West “ does.
So Putin owns the oil float so they ban his oil. If he manages to take Ukraine he’ll own the wheat float float also.
Biden and Obama are making money hand over fist for this.
Yup. Oil is one thing. Famine is another.
Yes. There are 200,000 Putins all over Ukraine and back in the Kremlin too - nobody else and he is a bad, bad man. No US policy involved here. Move along now nothing to see.
Uh, no, my deceptive friend - "ABM" is for Antiballistic Missiles, as in missiles to take out intercontinental Ballistic Missiles before they get to us. Defensive, get it?
The Russians have been happily building their next-generation offensive technologies while we have been occupied with Islamic terrorists.
And no, that doesn't even come close to the reason for Russia's attempt to seize Ukraine and its resources for them themselves while murdering hundreds, even thousands of Ukrainian civilans.
“Despite assurances to the contrary, NATO is not a ‘defensive organization’. Even though American memories are short, people elsewhere remember the bombing campaign against Serbia, and the removal of Gaddafi from power in Libya.
What NATO is in fact is the military arm of US hegemony, a hegemony that has seen it expand eastwards through Europe, right up to Russia’s very own borders.”
Yeah whatever, man.
PRO...PA....GAN....DA.
Tell me again how a DEFENSIVE missile system is a threat to Russia.
So Zelinsky good and you are aligned with Hunter and Joe Biden, Google, Facebook, Obama, the Clintons, James Clapper, the Democrat party, the corporate media, Lindsay Graham and Mittens then? No propaganda there. No siree
ABM capabilities are not JUST ‘defensive’, but depending on their effectiveness, would negate the offensive capability of the opponent. This is an indirect enhancement of a protagonists offensive capability, as they have less risk from MAD.
If the side with effective ABM did not have ANY offensive weaponry, THEN your protestations might have merit.
The New World Order folks didn’t lift one finger to stop Iran or North Korea from
getting nukes or the missiles to deliver them. Not Clinton, Bush, Obama, or
Biden have.
Right now Putin is helping Iran and Biden reactivate the nuclear weapons deal,
Which will result in Iran having THE BOMB.
Under Trump, when it looked like he might take military action against Kim, both
China and Russia moved troops close to the Korean Peninsula. The appearance
was that they planned to defend North Korea getting THE BOMB.
Iran is a proxy for Russia, and perhaps China by now.
North Korea is a proxy for both.
The idea that Putin is not on the side of the New World Order, or that the New World Order is not on his is an illusion.
Both entities clearly want to take down the United States. Four of the last five
US presidents have been in their back pocket: Putin is helping them in some very important quarters.
Kim is not all that far off from being able to deliver nukes to US cities.
I would say that this is one hell of lot a lot more dangerous to the US, then the
Ukraine situation is. So if Putin is truly against the NWO there, so what?
Bkmk
Would someone please explain to me why I should give a damn about the Ukraine. By that I mean my should the USA risk blood and treasure over the Ukraine. TIA
I don't think that's a fair assessment. Our military has been studying up on gender pronouns and "white rage".
Please tell your Soviet - in mean "Russian" - paymasters that some of us are impervious to your agency's propaganda efforts.
1. The USSR folded and allegedly was giving up on its efforts to threaten the world with nuclear annihilation. Somehow, though they kept at it and kept busily crafting new ways to kill all of us.
2. They are certainly capable of developing and fielding their own ABM systems - but no, they focused on building more advance mobile ICBMs and hypersonic delivery systems.
3. So, using this author's logic, we should go ahead and seize Mexico by slaughtering old ladies and kids through area weapons in civilian locations?
I am with you jpsb. But right now we have a cabal that will benefit from the continuation and escalation of a war there, where one of the combatants has canned sunshine to use. So I think figuring out how we got here is probably the best way to get it to stop. Just my $.02
Bump!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.