Posted on 01/15/2022 4:47:49 AM PST by Libloather
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - Four inmates at a northwest Arkansas jail sued the facility and its doctor Thursday after they said were unknowingly prescribed ivermectin to treat Covid-19 despite health officials’ warnings that the anti-parasitic drug shouldn’t be used for that purpose.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas filed the lawsuit in federal court on behalf of the detainees against the Washington County jail, Washington County Sheriff Tim Helder and Dr. Robert Karas. Helder in August revealed that ivermectin had been prescribed to inmates to treat their Covid-19.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
I do not disagree with you. Especially now that omicron has delivered what I believe you have said before people hospitalized with COVID not because of it. 95% or so of COVID by waste analysis is omicron. I still am seeing an occasional delta but this is clearly a pandemic ender.
I believe I have always advocated people should have a choice. But this is what actual science looks like. The conditions on the ground has changed. So we react by changing our recommendations and how we handle i it. Exactly the opposite of fauci who is agenda instead of science driven.
I have said nothing inaccurate. They are approved fully at present. They were given EUA approval. This is different than off label use.
fail
This is an example of the Government’s misinformation and policies coming back to bit them in the a$$. I hope they sue the $hit out of the government. It will be a easy case to win! After all the government has spend 2 years telling everyone that this drug will not work on COVID and is dangerous! A couple of US funded studies, a few CNN video clips and you could rest the case. The government would have to fold because if they even try to say the drug is safe and works on COVID..... well horse paste game over!
Looking a gift horse in the mouth comes to mind.
No. I do not agree. There is authorization but not formal “FDA approval” excepting in the case of Comirnaty, and the FDA specifically notes it and the “mRNA” experimentals are “legally different.” The confusion between the use of the word “approval” is a matter of how and when it is used.
— “Do you further not agree that everyone who has had a vaccine had a choice in it (they chose to roll up their sleeve and receive it)?
No. I do not agree again. If I trick you into “consenting” to use flunitrazepam, gamma hydroxybutryic acid, or ketamine, no court will agree that you “consented”.
— “Do you agree that there are not administrations of the vaccine by stealth?”
You apparently see no gaslighting in the media, nor mandates being exercised by companies and the US government in its military. Nor the occasional misapplication of doses in some pharmacies and programs to inoculate schoolchildren without parental consent.
— Do you agree that the complaint is that these four people...”
No. A legal complaint is not proof, but allegation, and this is allegation before litigation has determined an outcome.
— “Do you agree that ivermectin is NOT approved for the treatment of covid and when used it is being used off label?”
I agree that the FDA has opined that, and in the moment it stands, against medical research in opposition to it. I also further observe that the FDA often overturns its own judgments. I further observe that there are precious few drugs that the FDA bans from use off-label, a fact you surely know.
A question for you: Do you agree that the phase three, clinical trials continue and that as trials they are experimental?
How
After one of the above four determinations is in place, the HHS Secretary can issue a declaration that circumstances exist to justify issuing the EUA. This declaration is specific to EUAs and is not linked to other types of emergency declarations.
ACLU: American Communist Liberal Union. The inmates are fortunate they were not given normal covid protocol drugs, which either could have made things worse for them, health-wise, killed them, or ruined their livers. They should be thanking, instead of complaining.
Let’s cut to the chase: #1 - Do you believe in the USA there is any place in this country where a person can get a “vaccination” with a NON-EUA vaccine?? In other words every person now getting “vaccinated” is signing a form that states the injection is under EUA! #2 There are MILLIONS of people who, under duress, have taken the EUA vaccination so as to not lose their job! 100% there are millions of people who are being vaccinated “unwillingly” and under coercion! Yes, they are signing a form stating they are doing it “willingly” but they are doing it with a “gun to their head.” There are no FULLY APPROVED - NON EUA vaccines available in the USA, are there? If there are please be kind enough to let Freepers know where they are available!
An informative and easy-to-grasp chart. Thanks.
I see you don’t actually want to answer the questions. You are playing the great rhetorical game of answering questions with your own. Of note I have already answered your questions above.
Do you have the courage to directly answer that which I have asked ?
Ivermectin - The 2015 Nobel Prize winning drug that has saved millions.
This makes no sense.
Still alive to sue. Defense exhibit #1, the living breathing inmate on the stand.
There are a group of people whose eyes have not been blinded. The group that cannot see go with passion in their darkness. It’s good to be in the light! I like to save people’s time so they don’t have to type too many words - just an “I agree.”
I notice that gas_dr faulted you in about two minutes’ time for not answering questions, excepting by asking questions.
#32 posted on 1/15/2022, 9:19:30 AM
Oddly the challenge was “Do you have the courage to directly answer that which I have asked ?”
#26 posted on 1/15/2022, 9:02:20 AM
I responded to gas_dr cordially by answering questions straight out, and asked one question in return. No answer forthcoming as of about a half hour into the exchange. Two minutes for a reply to you. A half hour and no reply to me. Hmm.
"Courage" seems a flexible concept....
There are currently NO FULLY APPROVED vaccines available in the USA!
I believe the CV19 vaccine administration program in the world is a compulsive and fear oriented program. People are indeed “voluntarily” signing RELEASE of LIABILITY forms and “willingly” getting injected.
I have no knowledge of the complainants knowledge.
If a fully licensed doctor chooses to administer a drug - ANY DRUG - based upon his/her knowledge and based upon peer reviewed or other scientific data to attempt to cure a sickness then I believe your statement to be incorrect. Ivermectins effectiveness in treating CV19 is no longer a mystery. Scientific data exists on its usefulness in treating CV19 and I believe based upon that data doctors are authorized to use it in the treatment of individuals.
I noticed that. FR does not have an APP to alert us when we are being pinged!
On this forum you can definitely be exposed if you have an agenda. Hopefully gas_dr will respond to where we can get our FULLY APPROVED vaccines! People are dying to get them! /s
Not too big of a stretch to use a defense of,
it is a prison, lice, scabies, fleas etc. so the treatment was given as a wide use therapeutic for many possible maladies.
That question to dr_gas:
“Do you agree that the phase three, clinical trials continue and that as trials they are experimental?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.