Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oxford Professor: Official Data Shows Face Masks “Made No Meaningful Difference” to Infection Rates; Additionally, Face coverings “unlikely to have much of an impact” in fighting Omicron
Summit News ^ | 11/30/2021 | Paul Joseph Watson

Posted on 11/30/2021 9:51:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind

University of Oxford Professor Jim Naismith asserts that despite England dropping its mask mandate in July and Scotland keeping its rules in force, official data shows this “has made no meaningful difference” to infection rates.

Naismith goes on to argue that new face mask mandates imposed in England today are “unlikely to have much of an impact” in fighting off the spread of the Omicron variant.

Despite flatlining case numbers and declining deaths, partly achieved because England chose to lift lockdown restrictions in the summer unlike many European countries, mask mandates are once again back in force.

Face coverings are compulsory in shops, on public transport and numerous other venues arbitrarily chosen by the government.

Highlighting the absurdity of the rules, face masks are mandatory in takeaways but not restaurants, meaning you have to wear one if picking up a takeaway but not if you stay inside the restaurant for a sit down meal.

According to Naismith, Director of the Rosalind Franklin Institute and Professor of Structural Biology at the University of Oxford, masks are largely pointless.

“The ONS survey results on prevalence shows that the Scottish and English approach to masking, although formally different since July, has made no meaningful difference to Delta,writes Naismith.

“In both countries very high levels of prevalence have continued for months. Thus the new changes announced are unlikely to have much of an impact if Omicron does indeed spread rapidly,” he added.

As the graph above illustrates, despite England dropping mask mandates and Scotland keeping them in place after July, infection rates were similar or indeed higher in Scotland.

ONS graphs also validate such assertions.

“You can see the ONS graphs below for yourself, and he’s right,” notes Will Jones.

“Yet the Government has re-imposed masks in schools, shops and on public transport, despite there being no evidence that they make any significant impact on the spread of disease.”

A comparison between case rates in Sweden (which never legally imposed face masks) and the rest of Europe is also very revealing.

Meanwhile, in Sweden... pic.twitter.com/AXbAeCz5jy — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 11, 2021

Naismith’s verdict on face masks is backed up by UK government SAGE adviser Dr Colin Axon, who dismissed masks as “comfort blankets” that do virtually nothing, noting that the COVID-19 virus particle is up to 5,000 times smaller than the holes in the mask.

“The small sizes are not easily understood but an imperfect analogy would be to imagine marbles fired at builders’ scaffolding, some might hit a pole and rebound, but obviously most will fly through,” Axon said.

As the video below illustrates, public health officials like Dr. Hillary Jones (and even Dr. Fauci himself) originally were correct in saying that face masks were pointless.

However, as soon as they ‘got the memo’ that face masks were a tool of population control to keep people scared and compliant, their rhetoric on face coverings did a complete 180.

* * *


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: anthonyfauci; borisjohnson; covid19; covidstooges; england; facemask; getty; jimnaismith; mandate; mandates; mask; maskmandate; maskmandates; masks; obamacare; omicron; oxford; unitedkingdom; vaccinemandates; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2021 9:51:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Earlier in the pandemic there was a publication from India in which they examined the pore sizes of cloth masks. The pore size was typically around 500nm. The virus is 100nm in diameter. So obviously they do not work.


2 posted on 11/30/2021 9:54:44 AM PST by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, duh.

Face masks are a totem for the irrationally fearful to clutch at in order to fool themselves into thinking they can exert some control over the uncontrollable. It’s purely magical thinking, not science. Might as well buy a quartz crystal necklace or pyramid hat and wear that to stop viruses.


3 posted on 11/30/2021 9:54:45 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

RE: The pore size was typically around 500nm. The virus is 100nm in diameter. So obviously they do not work.

So, why can’t someone manufacture a face mask with a pore size much smaller than the coronavirus’ diameter?


4 posted on 11/30/2021 9:57:58 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This article is just confirming earlier studies that show face masks do not work.


5 posted on 11/30/2021 9:58:58 AM PST by Parley Baer (go trump )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
XiJinBiden asks, "That's OK for the Omicron variant, but what about the Omnicron variant? I fear that Corn Pop may get THAT variant!"


6 posted on 11/30/2021 9:59:45 AM PST by A Formerly Proud Canadian (Ceterum autem censeo Justinius True-dope-us esse delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Masks are not supposed to reduce the rate of infections. They reduce viral load and therefore tend to reduce severity of disease and deaths. That’s all fllks.


7 posted on 11/30/2021 10:01:50 AM PST by amihow (It is Western Civilization that confers privilege, not whiteness. Ask Carson, MLK, Sowell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Tell that to Biden and Fauxi. AS long as ehey’re in charge there won’t be progress in this matter.


8 posted on 11/30/2021 10:04:00 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Oh, they work.

But not as masks.

They’re muzzles.


9 posted on 11/30/2021 10:04:56 AM PST by mewzilla (Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

It is the ultimate virtue signal for most women and beta males.


10 posted on 11/30/2021 10:05:08 AM PST by bray (Our patience is wearing thin Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s not obvious to me that “mask mandates” as implemented do anything positive - but the literature on mask mandates comparing “mandate” with “non-mandate” almost never assesses the % of mask wearers in a mandate vs no-mandate area.


11 posted on 11/30/2021 10:07:21 AM PST by Jim Noble (The nation cannot be saved until the GOP is destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Anyone who has ever taken a course in virology (or worked in a virology lab) knows that cloth masks cannot do the job. They are pretty much worthless. You need a positive-pressure full face (or body) respirator system with its own contained air supply. Mask-wearing is silly. A sign of compliance. Not much else.


12 posted on 11/30/2021 10:08:24 AM PST by Blennos ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Looks like masks make things worse.


13 posted on 11/30/2021 10:10:15 AM PST by bray (Our patience is wearing thin Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blennos
RE: A sign of compliance. Not much else.

Reminds me of China under the Manchu Dynasty ( Ching Dynasty ). All males must have pigtails as sign of compliance to the Emperor.


14 posted on 11/30/2021 10:13:44 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: amihow

There is literally no proof they do that either.


15 posted on 11/30/2021 10:16:50 AM PST by servantoftheservant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh… so the last 100 years of science didn’t suddenly change in 2020… except for the fact that Dr. “I am the science” Fauci deemed it to be.


16 posted on 11/30/2021 10:19:10 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amihow

No - they don’t if the virus is aerosolized (like Covid is) and is smaller than the mask pores.

So yes - a gas mask will work. An N95 mask will work.

Your average face diaper will not.


17 posted on 11/30/2021 10:21:07 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Even Fauci knows (or used to know) that. When someone panics, and says “do something!”, this is what they get. You do it so they’ll stop screaming, even if it’s just a gesture. Governments are famous for meaningless gestures.


18 posted on 11/30/2021 10:24:24 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

That can’t he true. I always wear the facemask when walking between the front door and the bar and I have never got covid


19 posted on 11/30/2021 10:28:52 AM PST by dsrtsage ( Complexity is just simple lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Fauci says masks are ineffective
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcBFs4o0VYk


20 posted on 11/30/2021 10:36:10 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson