Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study suggests women and pregnant people are underrepresented in research to inform nutrition reference values
https://medicalxpress.com ^ | OCTOBER 22, 2021 | by George Washington University

Posted on 10/22/2021 12:01:17 PM PDT by Red Badger

Women and pregnant people are underrepresented in the studies used to draw up the nutritional guidance provided to Americans and Canadians, according to a paper published today in Science Advances.

"Our research is the first comprehensive review of the underlying research that informs nutrient reference values. These are used for so many things: from developing federal food programs to deciding what's in your granola bar to determining the makeup of your prenatal vitamins," Emily R. Smith, an assistant professor of exercise and nutrition sciences at the George Washington University, said. "Our study points to gaps in knowledge about the exact level of micronutrients we need to eat to protect the health of women, including pregnant women."

Smith and her colleagues reviewed all of the studies that underpin the reference values for micronutrients established in the Dietary Reference Values for the United States and Canada.

The team found that nearly one quarter of the studies included men only, and in research that did include women, female participants were underrepresented compared to men. Studies that used cutting-edge research methods were least likely to include women. Pregnant or lactating women were included in just 17% of the studies, a gap that makes it hard to provide nutritional advice to help keep mothers and babies healthy, Smith said.

Smith and her team also found that 90% of the studies in this subject area failed to identify the race or ethnicity of participants, a finding that raises a concern that minority populations are also underrepresented.

"Future versions of these national and international guidance reports should include metrics of diversity and inclusion, and any data used must be examined for sex-specific effects. Funders and researchers must redouble their efforts to include women and pregnant people in studies that can inform future versions of the nutrient reference values," Smith said. "Ultimately such efforts would help the private sector, governments, and the public get the nutritional information needed to support good health."

The study, "Limited data exists to inform our basic understanding of micronutrient requirements in pregnancy," was published online Oct. 22 in the journal Science Advances.

Explore further

Are women getting adequate nutrition during preconception and pregnancy?

More information:

Emily R. Smith, Limited data exist to inform our basic understanding of micronutrient requirements in pregnancy, Science Advances (2021). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abj8016.

www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abj8016

Journal information: Science Advances

Provided by George Washington University


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
pregnant people?????????????...............................
1 posted on 10/22/2021 12:01:17 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOLOLOL. Who are these “pregnant people”. Does someone have a photo of one?

They don’t exist. Anywhere. Ever.

If you ever doubted that liberals are insane this should settle the issue.


2 posted on 10/22/2021 12:02:58 PM PDT by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Is she SUGGESTING we make more pregnant people? Well, well, well!


3 posted on 10/22/2021 12:03:06 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Any study that uses the term “pregnant people” should be sent to File 13 immediately.


4 posted on 10/22/2021 12:03:19 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I love my country. It's my government that I hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

pregnant people???


You’re questioning that? Next thing you’ll say is that Richard Levine isn’t the first woman to achieve four-star admiral rank.
/s


5 posted on 10/22/2021 12:10:17 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m offended because they didn’t say, “birthing persons”.


6 posted on 10/22/2021 12:10:36 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (Proudly posting comments without reading the articles since 2002.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Stunningly stupid sh8t. Someone should be embarrassed.


7 posted on 10/22/2021 12:15:39 PM PDT by hoe_cake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Exactly, who the frak is/are ‘pregnant people’?

LMAO


8 posted on 10/22/2021 12:16:44 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So, Red Badger was kidnapped and his screen name taken over by a liberal who posts micronutrients and pregnant people crap?

Yikes....


9 posted on 10/22/2021 12:20:01 PM PDT by GOPJ (Military suicide deaths last year: 580- By COVID:56 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOC_dcuJO48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOL.

Not only are they “underrepresented” I have no doubt they are “underserved” as well.


10 posted on 10/22/2021 12:20:45 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Everything Woke turns to shit.” ~ President Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Being aware of the insanity of our country is important.
There’s more to this world than Brian Laundrie and Alec Baldwin...
:)


11 posted on 10/22/2021 12:22:29 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

Isn’t “pregnant” an offensive pejorative? Shouldn’t it be something like “Birthing Person with clump of gestating cells”?


12 posted on 10/22/2021 12:23:05 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Everything Woke turns to shit.” ~ President Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

Hey pal, birthing persons have to be pregnant persons first.


13 posted on 10/22/2021 12:24:44 PM PDT by PROCON (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

14 posted on 10/22/2021 12:26:04 PM PDT by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Not only are they “underrepresented” I have no doubt they are “underserved” as well.

Oh my.
15 posted on 10/22/2021 12:26:49 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“... pregnant people...”

When they say pregnant people, they don’t mean men. They are staying within their gender guidelines and referencing women that identify as men to include them when they screw up or get that way trying to have children as an identified man to procreate.

Of course a man cannot get pregnant. But a woman that looks like a man can in most situations. It’s a word game.

wy69


16 posted on 10/22/2021 12:47:52 PM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

I can’t imagine Joe Biden’s mother ever being a woman, was probably a pregnant person. With the requisite freakazoid child.


17 posted on 10/22/2021 1:02:16 PM PDT by Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Uterus owners


18 posted on 10/22/2021 1:10:03 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Covid Is All About Mail In Balloting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
There’s more to this world than Brian Laundrie and Alec Baldwin... :)

LOL - you're right. Bring on the pregnant people stories...

19 posted on 10/22/2021 1:17:56 PM PDT by GOPJ (Military suicide deaths last year: 580- By COVID:56 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOC_dcuJO48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Uterus owners

You went from sexist to racist in only two words!
20 posted on 10/22/2021 1:20:38 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson