Posted on 07/14/2021 8:25:53 PM PDT by Enlightened1
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ChQwQBggc8TL/
So out of one side of your mouth you say it has nothing to do with clotting, and the other side you say you use it to determine if you should consider *anticoagulation*.
Facepalm.
Do you double date with Jen Psaki or something?
The question is, how elevated did that Canadian doctor say the levels were in the 62% of patients?
He threw out a range but I didn’t remember, and I don’t want to relisten to the whole thing this time of night.
Now. now, you know me better than this. And you are twisting what I said into a pretzel. There is no question that wild type covid induce a procoaguable state. You are attributing it to the spike proteins. Thrombosis is not generally diagnosed with D-Dimer and as I said, we use it as a marker of inflammation.
Please re-look at that I said, if indeed there I microcirculatory effects as is proffered in this article, D-Dimer is not the test to look at. Any inflamed state will induce a pro-coagulable milleu. There is a fair amount of nuance as to what I said, and I am certain you can understand the nuance.
This presenter also apparently believes - or wants people to believe - injections are supposed to stay only at the injection site…
—
That was the intent. The injected mRNA will enter the nearby cells and instruct the ribosomes to construct spike proteins. This triggers the body’s immune response and ultimately those infected cells will be destroyed by the body’s killer T-cells.
Muscle cells will rebuild themselves. However, if the vacinne mRNA enters the bloodstream and circulates thru the body, the mRNA will gravitate to cells where the transporting lipid nanoparticle binds. This has been demonstrated to include the bone marrow and brain cells as well as ovaries. This will result in the spike proteins being replicated in these areas of the body and again as part of the immune response, those cells will be destroyed by killer T-cells.
That was the intent.
If they are dissolved in ingredients that are distributed theough the body, I’m not sure that was the intent.
I didn’t hear him say the d-dimer levels....only that....he issued these specific blood/d-dimer tests, to his patients who’d received the shots.
And, that the d-dimer test is very specific for blood clots....NEW blood clots, not older (previous) ones.
Hmmmm.....perhaps you mean STATED intent, flick.
"In the Covid era, we use it exactly as a marker of inflammation and to determine if anticoagulation should be considered, specifically."
To a lay person, anticoagulation == making clots go away. Low molecular weight heparin (bad with the coof, I've read), Coumadin , Eliquis (spelling), Xarelto. And you can't make clots go away unless there are clots present TO go away. So you'll have to explain specifically what's different between microclots in the capillaries (on physical grounds, that's where I'd expect them with the coof/spike protein), and generalized inflammation. We know the spike protein causes inflammation, btw, so what's the differential diagnosis other than loudly exclaiming "I DON'T BELIEVE IN CAPILLARY CLOTS, I'M A DOCTOR!" ?
D-dimer is also elevated in cancer.
Yes.
I think the pub med link, that I posted, upthread, broke down the related cause percentages.
4 PC Access Bump
I’m wondering if perhaps you’re being a bit hard on the value of d-dimer analytical results. It has been shown to be moderately good for diagnosis and prognosis for covid. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10760296211010976
It seems almost irrelevant for you to point out that many inflammations can cause elevated d-dimer, because we’re not examining cases at random, rather cases that arise after a specific treatment made to mimic the presence of covid. Therefore, it seems more than plausible to assume the elevated levels are specifically due to clotting events, as observed in the disease.
On the other hand, this being the case, there seems to be no reason to believe that this coagulation should inexorably lead to death, any more than covid leads to death in previously healthy people. The process being measured is the same for the disease or for the mRNA jab.
My conclusion is that the dr is making a legitimate measurement, but proving only that the vaccines mimic the disease. Anything beyond that seems a little...hysterical.
I hope it does freak you out. The mere
thought that this entire mess may be
nefarious should freak anyone out.
The days of honest media...long gone.
They create, and perpetuate, this
madness. You’re gonna get two sides
to every story, and the answers sought
are no longer within reach. It’s
impossible to read a report and take it
verbatim.
I’m with you on this. Actually, if you have people here on FR that are debating what these “vaccines” may be doing within our bodies and no one really knows for sure...why the he** would I take the jab? I’ll gladly wait for a few more months to see how many folks are affected long-term. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.