Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Detects Lattice Confinement Fusion
NASA ^ | Page Last Updated: April 15, 2021 | NASA, Scott Graham

Posted on 06/02/2021 1:27:37 AM PDT by Kevmo

Lattice Confinement Fusion

NASA Detects Lattice Confinement Fusion A team of NASA researchers seeking a new energy source for deep-space exploration missions, recently revealed a method for triggering nuclear fusion in the space between the atoms of a metal solid. Their research was published in two peer-reviewed papers in the top journal in the field, Physical Review C, Volume 101 (April, 2020): “Nuclear fusion reactions in deuterated metals” and “Novel nuclear reactions observed in bremsstrahlung-irradiated deuterated metals.” Nuclear fusion is a process that produces energy when two nuclei join to form a heavier nucleus. “Scientists are interested in fusion, because it could generate enormous amounts of energy without creating long-lasting radioactive byproducts,” said Theresa Benyo, Ph.D., of NASA’s Glenn Research Center. “However, conventional fusion reactions are difficult to achieve and sustain because they rely on temperatures so extreme to overcome the strong electrostatic repulsion between positively charged nuclei that the process has been impractical.” Called Lattice Confinement Fusion, the method NASA revealed accomplishes fusion reactions with the fuel (deuterium, a widely available non-radioactive hydrogen isotope composed of a proton, neutron, and electron, and denoted “D”) confined in the space between the atoms of a metal solid. In previous fusion research such as inertial confinement fusion, fuel (such as deuterium/tritium) is compressed to extremely high levels but for only a short, nano-second period of time, when fusion can occur. In magnetic confinement fusion, the fuel is heated in a plasma to temperatures much higher than those at the center of the Sun. In the new method, conditions sufficient for fusion are created in the confines of the metal lattice that is held at ambient temperature. While the metal lattice, loaded with deuterium fuel, may initially appear to be at room temperature, the new method creates an energetic environment inside the lattice where individual atoms achieve equivalent fusion-level kinetic energies.

Photograph of the deuterated metals exposed to the bremsstrahlung radiation during the test. During exposure, the deuterated erbium (ErD3) showed evidence of fusion reactions. A metal such as erbium is “deuterated” or loaded with deuterium atoms, “deuterons,” packing the fuel a billion times denser than in magnetic confinement (tokamak) fusion reactors. In the new method, a neutron source “heats” or accelerates deuterons sufficiently such that when colliding with a neighboring deuteron it causes D-D fusion reactions. In the current experiments, the neutrons were created through photodissociation of deuterons via exposure to 2.9+MeV gamma (energetic X-ray) beam. Upon irradiation, some of the fuel deuterons dissociate resulting in both the needed energetic neutrons and protons. In addition to measuring fusion reaction neutrons, the Glenn Team also observed the production of even more energetic neutrons which is evidence of boosted fusion reactions or screened Oppenheimer-Phillips (O-P) nuclear stripping reactions with the metal lattice atoms. Either reaction opens a path to process scaling.

Illustration of the main elements of the lattice confinement fusion process observed. In Part (A), a lattice of erbium is loaded with deuterium atoms (i.e., erbium deuteride), which exist here as deuterons. Upon irradiation with a photon beam, a deuteron dissociates, and the neutron and proton are ejected. The ejected neutron collides with another deuteron, accelerating it as an energetic “d*” as seen in (B) and (D). The “d*” induces either screened fusion (C) or screened Oppenheimer-Phillips (O-P) stripping reactions (E). In (C), the energetic “d*” collides with a static deuteron “d” in the lattice, and they fuse together. This fusion reaction releases either a neutron and helium-3 (shown) or a proton and tritium. These fusion products may also react in subsequent nuclear reactions, releasing more energy. In (E), a proton is stripped from an energetic “d*” and is captured by an erbium (Er) atom, which is then converted to a different element, thulium (Tm). If the neutron instead is captured by Er, a new isotope of Er is formed (not shown).

A novel feature of the new process is the critical role played by metal lattice electrons whose negative charges help “screen” the positively charged deuterons. Such screening allows adjacent fuel nuclei to approach one another more closely, reducing the chance they simply scatter off one another, and increasing the likelihood that they tunnel through the electrostatic barrier promoting fusion. This is according to the theory developed by the project’s theoretical physicist, Vladimir Pines, Ph.D, of PineSci. “The current findings open a new path for initiating fusion reactions for further study within the scientific community. However, the reaction rates need to be increased substantially to achieve appreciable power levels, which may be possible utilizing various reaction multiplication methods under consideration,” said Glenn’s Bruce Steinetz, Ph.D., the NASA project principal investigator. “The key to this discovery has been the talented, multi-disciplinary team that NASA Glenn assembled to investigate temperature anomalies and material transmutations that had been observed with highly deuterated metals,” said Leonard Dudzinski, Chief Technologist for Planetary Science, who supported the research. “We will need that approach to solve significant engineering challenges before a practical application can be designed.” With more study and development, future applications could include power systems for long-duration space exploration missions or in-space propulsion. It also could be used on Earth for electrical power or creating medical isotopes for nuclear medicine. Publications

NASA Detects Lattice Confinement Fusion

Novel Nuclear Reactions Observed in Bremsstrahlung-Irradiated Deuterated Metals

Nuclear Fusion Reactions in Deuterated Metals

Experimental Observations of Nuclear Activity in Deuterated Materials Subjected to a Low-Energy Photon Beam

Gamma Energy Evaluation for Creation of Cd-111(sub m), In-113(sub m), and In-115(sub m) Isotopes

Investigation of Deuterium Loaded Materials Subject to X-Ray Exposure

NASA GRC Hosts Lattice Confinement Fusion Virtual Workshop

Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) Overview

Fast Neutron Spectroscopy with Organic Scintillation Detectors in a High Radiation Field Images

Fusion reaction results from one of the tests performed. (a) Neutron spectra observed during the gamma exposure of deuterated erbium (ErD3) showing evidence of fusion energy neutrons (~2.5 MeV). The plot also shows the presence of higher energy 4-5 MeV neutrons that indicates other nuclear processes occurred. These are believed to be screened Oppenheimer-Phillips reactions that may point a way toward increasing reaction rates, important to future applications. (b) Data from the current NASA work is consistent with fusion energy neutrons observed in an ENEA-Fusion tokamak magnetic confinement fusion reactor, shown in the lower figure. Videos

The GRC Team’s LCF Journey

Nuclear Fusion Reactions in Deuterated Metals

https://youtu.be/ug7B7Gsm-2Y


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; cmns; coldfusion; fusion; inertialconfinement; laser; latticeconfinement; lenr; nasa; physics; science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/space/science/lattice-confinement-fusion/#lightbox-image-2

NASA video https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/space/science/lattice-confinement-fusion/#lightbox-image-2

NASA Official: Scott Graham Page Editor: Timothy Reckart Page Last Updated: April 15, 2021

1 posted on 06/02/2021 1:27:37 AM PDT by Kevmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Bookmark


2 posted on 06/02/2021 1:29:37 AM PDT by rdl6989 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

This is Cold Fusion, no?


3 posted on 06/02/2021 1:29:39 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

NASA video
https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/space/science/lattice-confinement-fusion/#lightbox-image-2

Neutron spectra observed
https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/LCF-Combined.png

Experimental Observations of Nuclear Activity in Deuterated Materials Subjected to a Low-Energy Photon Beam
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170002584/downloads/20170002584.pdf


4 posted on 06/02/2021 1:33:06 AM PDT by Kevmo (some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Yes.

But don’t hit it.


5 posted on 06/02/2021 1:33:43 AM PDT by Kevmo (some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc; citizen; Liberty1970; Red Badger; Wonder Warthog; PA Engineer; glock rocks; free_life; ..

Cold Fusion Ping List
Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science

http://lenr-canr.org/
Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y
Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette
https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp
-——— ——————————
Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc.


6 posted on 06/02/2021 1:37:11 AM PDT by Kevmo (some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All; y'all

https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/nuclear/nuclear-fusiontokamak-not-included

05 Aug 2020 | 21:00 GMT
Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion

NASA researchers demonstrate the ability to fuse atoms inside room-temperature metals

By Michael Koziol

Nuclear fusion is hard to do. It requires extremely high densities and pressures to force the nuclei of elements like hydrogen and helium to overcome their natural inclination to repel each other. On Earth, fusion experiments typically require large, expensive equipment to pull off.
But researchers at NASA’s Glenn Research Center have now demonstrated a method of inducing nuclear fusion without building a massive stellarator or tokamak. In fact, all they needed was a bit of metal, some hydrogen, and an electron accelerator.

The team believes that their method, called lattice confinement fusion, could be a potential new power source for deep space missions. They have published their results in two papers in Physical Review C.

“Lattice confinement” refers to the lattice structure formed by the atoms making up a piece of solid metal. The NASA group used samples of erbium and titanium for their experiments. Under high pressure, a sample was “loaded” with deuterium gas, an isotope of hydrogen with one proton and one neutron. The metal confines the deuterium nuclei, called deuterons, until it’s time for fusion.

“During the loading process, the metal lattice starts breaking apart in order to hold the deuterium gas,” says Theresa Benyo, an analytical physicist and nuclear diagnostics lead on the project. “The result is more like a powder.” At that point, the metal is ready for the next step: overcoming the mutual electrostatic repulsion between the positively-charged deuteron nuclei, the so-called Coulomb barrier.

Photo: NASA
Dr. Theresa Benyo documents beam conditions during NASA’s lattice confinement fusion experiments while Jim Scheid and Larry Forsley discuss the beam stability data.
To overcome that barrier requires a sequence of particle collisions. First, an electron accelerator speeds up and slams electrons into a nearby target made of tungsten. The collision between beam and target creates high-energy photons, just like in a conventional X-ray machine. The photons are focused and directed into the deuteron-loaded erbium or titanium sample. When a photon hits a deuteron within the metal, it splits it apart into an energetic proton and neutron. Then the neutron collides with another deuteron, accelerating it.

At the end of this process of collisions and interactions, you’re left with a deuteron that’s moving with enough energy to overcome the Coulomb barrier and fuse with another deuteron in the lattice.

Key to this process is an effect called electron screening, or the shielding effect. Even with very energetic deuterons hurtling around, the Coulomb barrier can still be enough to prevent fusion. But the lattice helps again. “The electrons in the metal lattice form a screen around the stationary deuteron,” says Benyo. The electrons’ negative charge shields the energetic deuteron from the repulsive effects of the target deuteron’s positive charge until the nuclei are very close, maximizing the amount of energy that can be used to fuse.

Aside from deuteron-deuteron fusion, the NASA group found evidence of what are known as Oppenheimer-Phillips stripping reactions. Sometimes, rather than fusing with another deuteron, the energetic deuteron would collide with one of lattice’s metal atoms, either creating an isotope or converting the atom to a new element. The team found that both fusion and stripping reactions produced useable energy.

Photo: NASA
Bayarbadrakh Baramsai and Philip Ugorowski confer on the neutron spectroscopy system used to detect fusion neutrons.

“What we did was not cold fusion,” says Lawrence Forsley, a senior lead experimental physicist for the project. Cold fusion, the idea that fusion can occur at relatively low energies in room-temperature materials, is viewed with skepticism by the vast majority of physicists. Forsley stresses this is hot fusion, but “We’ve come up with a new way of driving it.”

“Lattice confinement fusion initially has lower temperatures and pressures” than something like a tokamak, says Benyo. But “where the actual deuteron-deuteron fusion takes place is in these very hot, energetic locations.” Benyo says that when she would handle samples after an experiment, they were very warm. That warmth is partially from the fusion, but the energetic photons initiating the process also contribute heat.

There’s still plenty of research to be done by the NASA team. Now they’ve demonstrated nuclear fusion, the next step is to create reactions that are more efficient and more numerous. When two deuterons fuse, they create either a proton and tritium (a hydrogen atom with two neutrons), or helium-3 and a neutron. In the latter case, that extra neutron can start the process over again, allowing two more deuterons to fuse. The team plans to experiment with ways to coax more consistent and sustained reactions in the metal.
Benyo says that the ultimate goal is still to be able to power a deep-space mission with lattice confinement fusion.

Power, space, and weight are all at a premium on a spacecraft, and this method of fusion offers a potentially reliable source for craft operating in places where solar panels may not be useable, for example. And of course, what works in space could be used on Earth.


7 posted on 06/02/2021 1:49:56 AM PDT by Kevmo (some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

wait, wut?

8 posted on 06/02/2021 2:21:37 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Sounds like “cool fusion”.


9 posted on 06/02/2021 2:28:52 AM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy

I wonder if they’re flooding the quantum well to get reaction but would you get a net positive?


10 posted on 06/02/2021 2:32:30 AM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Thanks Kevmo. Psst! Laz just hit it.


11 posted on 06/02/2021 3:06:17 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Fleishman and Ponds were right.


12 posted on 06/02/2021 4:46:02 AM PDT by MattMusson (Sometimes the wind blows too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
A novel feature of the new process is the critical role played by metal lattice electrons whose negative charges help “screen” the positively charged deuterons. Such screening allows adjacent fuel nuclei to approach one another more closely, reducing the chance they simply scatter off one another, and increasing the likelihood that they tunnel through the electrostatic barrier promoting fusion.

They should look into the creation of a tube-like lattice structure that would allow only one or two atoms of hydrogen through at a time, like a tunnel...................

13 posted on 06/02/2021 5:12:09 AM PDT by Red Badger (Jesus said there is no marriage in Heaven. That's why they call it Heaven.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...


· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·

14 posted on 06/02/2021 5:33:45 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
But don’t hit it.

But I GOTTA.

I just GOTTA.

15 posted on 06/02/2021 7:26:27 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There have been a slight few experiments with carbon nanotubes in LENR.

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22cold+fusion%22+lenr+carbon+nanotubes&sxsrf=ALeKk01R9RXvxC8JZAn65G57RzgIlpn1_A%3A1622646550617&source=hp&ei=Fp-3YNaEIsPetQXck5bQDQ&oq=%22cold+fusion%22+lenr+carbon+nanotubes&gs_lcp=ChFtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1ocBADMgUIIRCrAjIFCCEQqwI6BwgjEOoCECc6DQguEMcBEK8BEOoCECc6DQguEMcBEK8BECcQkwI6BAgjECc6BAguECc6CAgAELEDEIMBOgsILhCxAxDHARCjAjoICC4QsQMQgwE6AggAOg4ILhCxAxCDARDHARCjAjoFCAAQsQM6AgguOgUIABDJAzoFCAAQkgM6BQguELEDOggILhDHARCvAToECAAQCjoGCAAQFhAeOggIABAWEAoQHjoFCAAQhgM6BQghEKABOgcIIRAKEKABUJwVWP2IAmCAnAJoBHAAeACAAfMBiAGXLpIBBjAuMzUuM5gBAKABAbABDw&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-hp


16 posted on 06/02/2021 8:11:10 AM PDT by Kevmo (some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I don’t think carbon is strong enough. They should try to make them of silicon.................


17 posted on 06/02/2021 8:12:12 AM PDT by Red Badger (Jesus said there is no marriage in Heaven. That's why they call it Heaven.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy; Lazamataz

That sure sounds like Laz hittin’ it...


18 posted on 06/02/2021 8:12:56 AM PDT by Kevmo (some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There’s no such thing as silicon nanotubes, as fas as I know.

My theory postulates that in these lattice environments a Luttinger Liquid Linear Bose-Einstein Condensate is formed.

https://www.google.com/search?q=+v1dllbec&sxsrf=ALeKk02OyEhpIQOi-dyHMnc_E_mnInyQ7w%3A1622646969271&ei=uaC3YIH_D9u7tQbb5rSIAQ&oq=+v1dllbec&gs_lcp=ChNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwEAMyBAgeEAo6BAgAEEc6BQgAEM0CUNIvWIA4YLvoAWgAcAF4AIABwgKIAbsSkgEHMC42LjMuMpgBAKABAcgBCMABAQ&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp

These latest rounds of theories proposing Metallic Hydrogen serving as the host lattice are extensions of the Luttinger Liquid model, in essence they’re momentary Linear Luttinger Solids [generating a linear BEC].


19 posted on 06/02/2021 8:21:24 AM PDT by Kevmo (some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
There’s no such thing as silicon nanotubes, as fas as I know.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_nanotube

20 posted on 06/02/2021 8:38:23 AM PDT by Red Badger (Jesus said there is no marriage in Heaven. That's why they call it Heaven.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson